Ford Puma vs. Peugeot 2008: Complete Comparison 2025

The Ford Puma is a stylish crossover that has revived a well-known name from the past, betting on a sporty design and agile driving characteristics. It stands against the Peugeot 2008, which captivates with its bold, futuristic look and modern interior featuring the i-Cockpit layout. Both of these popular small SUVs target the same customers, but they do so in completely different ways, which promises an interesting comparison.

Exterior dimensions: Peugeot plays in a higher class, Puma bets on compactness

At first glance at the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008, a fundamental difference in their concepts is apparent. The Peugeot 2008 is an overall larger car, with its dimensions pushing the boundaries of the compact class. The Ford Puma, on the other hand, remains true to the definition of a compact crossover, which gives it an advantage in tight urban conditions.

The biggest difference is in the length of the body. The Peugeot 2008 measures 4300 mm in length, while the Puma ranges between 4186–4207 mm. The ten-centimetre difference is noticeably reflected not only in the interior space but also in the more confident stance of the French car on the road. The wheelbase of the Peugeot is also longer (2605 mm vs. 2588 mm for the Puma), which usually promises more legroom for rear passengers and a smoother ride on the motorway.

The Ford Puma counters with a wider body. At 1805 mm, it surpasses the Peugeot 2008 (1770 mm) by a significant 3.5 centimetres. This can mean slightly more shoulder room and a more robust appearance, but also less leeway in narrow parking spaces. The height of both cars is almost identical, with a slight edge for the Puma, but this has no practical effect on headroom. The choice between these two models in terms of dimensions thus depends on priorities – whether you prefer interior spaciousness and the feel of a larger car (Peugeot 2008), or agility and easier manoeuvrability in the city (Ford Puma).

Boot volume and practicality

Practicality is key in the small SUV segment, and the size of the luggage compartment plays a crucial role when choosing a family car. At first glance, it might seem that the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 are very similar in this regard, but the reality reveals interesting differences. Each model approaches the use of space a little differently, which can be decisive depending on your needs.

The Ford Puma in its second generation (from 2020) offers a very competitive volume of 456 litres with the seats in their standard configuration. Its secret weapon, however, is the innovative "MegaBox" compartment under the boot floor. This 80-litre, waterproof tub with a drain plug is ideal for transporting dirty or wet items, such as wellington boots or sports equipment, without soiling the rest of the luggage space. In contrast, the second-generation Peugeot 2008 (also from 2020) initially offered a more modest 405 litres, with newer versions (from 2023) increasing the volume to a still slightly smaller 434 litres.

The situation changes dramatically when the rear seats are folded down. Here, the Peugeot 2008 clearly dominates with a maximum volume of up to 1467 litres, making it a champion for moving bulky loads. The Ford Puma lags behind in this respect with a maximum capacity of 1216 litres. For buyers, this means a clear choice: the Puma excels in everyday practicality and clever solutions for an active lifestyle, while the 2008 offers significantly more space for occasionally transporting large items.

Trailer weight: Peugeot 2008 as a workhorse, Puma more for occasional use

When it comes to towing capacity, the differences between the two models are significant and could be a deciding factor for some buyers. Simply put, the Peugeot 2008 is the more capable vehicle in this discipline. Most of its second-generation combustion engines, whether the 1.2 PureTech petrol or the 1.5 BlueHDi diesel, can handle a braked trailer weighing up to 1200 kg. In practice, this means it can easily tow a small caravan, a trailer with a motorbike, or a fully loaded trailer with building materials.

In contrast, the Ford Puma offers more variable, but generally lower, figures. The most common 1.0 EcoBoost mild-hybrid engines can handle between 900 and 1100 kg, depending on the version. The same maximum value of 1100 kg was also offered by the now less common 1.5 EcoBlue diesel engine. A major limitation applies to the sporty ST version, which can only tow 750 kg, making it suitable mainly for light unbraked trailers. More importantly, the all-electric Peugeot e-2008 cannot officially tow any trailer.

For those who plan to use a tow bar regularly, the Peugeot 2008 with a combustion engine is the clear choice. The Ford Puma will suffice for occasional towing of smaller trailers, but it is necessary to carefully check the technical certificate of the specific engine version.

Engine Duel: Mild-Hybrid Ferocity vs. a Wide Range of Choices

When it comes to engine selection, the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 take completely different paths. Ford has bet almost everything on one card – the award-winning one-litre, three-cylinder EcoBoost engine, which in the vast majority of cases is supported by mild-hybrid technology. The goal is to offer fun driving characteristics with favourable fuel consumption. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 comes with a much wider range that will satisfy almost everyone: from economical PureTech petrol engines and BlueHDi diesel units for high-mileage drivers to the fully electric e-2008 version for fans of modern technology. The choice thus clearly depends on preferences and how the car will be used.

Ford Puma: A Bet on EcoBoost and Sporting Genes

The heart of the Ford Puma is almost exclusively the turbocharged 1.0 EcoBoost three-cylinder engine. For the used car market, the most relevant versions are those with the mild-hybrid system (mHEV), which helps reduce fuel consumption and improves acceleration dynamics. The base version offers 92 kW (125 hp), and the more powerful, very brisk variant provides 114 kW (155 hp). For drivers who crave a sporty ride, there is the top ST version with a 1.5 EcoBoost engine producing 147 kW (200 hp). Between 2020 and 2021, a 1.5 EcoBlue diesel engine was also briefly on sale, which is now an interesting choice for those looking for an economical used car for long journeys. A six-speed manual gearbox is standard, but a seven-speed dual-clutch automatic is also available.

Peugeot 2008: Variety in the Leading Role

The Peugeot 2008 is built on diversity. The foundation is the 1.2 PureTech three-cylinder petrol engine, available in three power levels: 74 kW (100 hp), 96 kW (130 hp), and the top 114 kW (155 hp), with the latter available only with the eight-speed EAT8 automatic transmission. For drivers with high annual mileage, there is the 1.5 BlueHDi four-cylinder diesel, most often in the 96 kW (130 hp) version with an automatic transmission, which offers an excellent compromise between dynamics and fuel economy. The key ace up its sleeve, however, is the fully electric e-2008 version with 100 kW (136 hp), which was available from the very beginning and is an ideal choice for urban and suburban driving.

Summary and Recommendations

• For drivers looking for fun: The Ford Puma with the 114 kW mild-hybrid engine or the ST version is the clear choice. It offers an agile chassis and lively engines.
• For those who want maximum choice: The Peugeot 2008 has an answer for everyone. An economical petrol for calmer drivers, a powerful diesel for long journeys, and a quiet electric car for the city.
• For economical operation: The diesel versions of both models offer low fuel consumption, but the Peugeot 2008 also adds the option of completely emission-free operation thanks to the electric e-2008 variant.

Choosing the right engine is absolutely key to long-term satisfaction with a car. In the following lines, we will therefore advise you on which power units for the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 are the best choice on the used car market in terms of performance, real-world fuel consumption, owner feedback, and mechanical reliability. While Ford bet almost exclusively on the acclaimed but technically more complex 1.0 EcoBoost mild-hybrid three-cylinder engines for the Puma, Peugeot offered a broader, but also riskier, range for the 2008 model. It included 1.2 PureTech petrol three-cylinders, economical 1.5 BlueHDi diesels, and the purely electric e-2008 version. However, diesel engines gradually faded into the background for both brands in this generation.

Recommended for the Ford Puma: 1.0 EcoBoost Hybrid (125 hp / 92 kW)

The ideal choice for the Ford Puma appears to be the mild-hybrid one-litre three-cylinder engine in the 92 kW (125 hp) version. It represents an optimal compromise between purchase price, running costs, and dynamics. Thanks to the 48V mild-hybrid system, which assists the combustion engine during acceleration, the car is pleasantly lively even from low revs and is well-suited for both city driving and longer journeys.

• Why it's the best choice: This engine offers enough power for both normal and brisker driving. The mild-hybrid system effectively reduces fuel consumption, which in real-world conditions is around 6.1 l/100 km, while also improving the engine's flexibility. It is a refined and economical unit that gives the Puma its playful character.
• Known risks and weaknesses: Although it is a reliable engine, it has its specifics. As with other EcoBoost engines, it uses a "wet" timing belt, which is immersed in oil. Although Ford specifies a long replacement interval (up to 240,000 km or 10 years), it is recommended to shorten it preventively to around 120,000 km to avoid the risk of belt degradation and clogging of the oil pump. In the first model years (2019-2021), there were occasional problems with the 48V system's battery, which manifested as error messages.
• Who is it ideal for: This engine is a versatile choice for the vast majority of drivers. It will be appreciated by those who drive daily in the city as well as those who regularly go on longer trips on motorways or country roads and want to enjoy the Puma's agile chassis.

For the Peugeot 2008, we recommend: 1.2 PureTech (130 hp / 96 kW)

In the case of the Peugeot 2008, the choice is more complex, but the best compromise between performance and affordability is the turbocharged 1.2 PureTech three-cylinder engine with 96 kW (130 hp). The engine provides the car with confident performance, quiet operation, and, in combination with the eight-speed automatic transmission, a comfortable ride. However, its purchase is associated with the need for careful inspection and honest servicing.

• Why it's a good choice (with reservations): The 130 hp output and 230 Nm of torque give the lightweight crossover excellent flexibility. The engine is refined, and driving it is pleasant. In real-world conditions, fuel consumption ranges between 6 and 7 litres per 100 km. On the used car market, this is the most widespread and affordable option.
• Critical risks and weaknesses: A fundamental and well-known problem with this engine is the timing belt running in oil. Using the wrong oil or extending service intervals leads to its degradation. Loose rubber particles can clog the oil pump strainer, leading to a loss of oil pressure and catastrophic engine failure. Therefore, it is absolutely essential to change the oil at a maximum of 15,000 km (ideally sooner) and to use only the oil specification approved by the manufacturer. Before buying, it is necessary to check the service history and the condition of the belt.
• Who is it ideal for: This engine is suitable for an informed buyer who is willing to invest in prevention and adhere to a strict service schedule. It will reward them with pleasant performance. It is not an ideal choice for drivers looking for a completely worry-free car who only deal with servicing when a problem arises. For those who want to avoid the risk, a more reliable but less common alternative on the market is the 1.5 BlueHDi diesel engine.

Real-World Consumption Comparison: Which is More Economical?

Official fuel consumption figures, measured under laboratory conditions of the WLTP cycle, are one thing; real-world operation and actual fuel costs are another. That's why we looked at data from drivers themselves, primarily from databases like Germany's Spritmonitor.de, to find out how the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 perform in everyday life. The differences between the stated and actual consumption can be significant and depend on driving style, route profile, and vehicle load.

The following table shows the average real-world consumption for the most common engine versions of both models from generations relevant to the used car market (from around the 2020 model year).

The data clearly shows several interesting trends. In the petrol engine category, the Ford Puma with its mild-hybrid system has a slight edge. Its one-litre EcoBoost Hybrid is more economical in the real world than Peugeot's 1.2 PureTech three-cylinder, by about 0.4 litres per 100 km. Ford's mild-hybrid technology demonstrably helps reduce consumption, especially in urban and suburban traffic. Conversely, the PureTech engine's consumption is more sensitive to driving style and can easily increase with more dynamic driving.

With diesel engines, the situation is more balanced, but with a slight advantage for Ford. Its 1.5 EcoBlue unit proves to be slightly more economical on average than the comparable 1.5 BlueHDi from Peugeot. Both engines are an excellent choice for drivers who regularly cover long motorway distances, where their consumption drops most significantly. In real-world combined operation, however, the Puma averages a few tenths of a litre lower.

For the typical user, this means that if they are looking for the most economical petrol crossover for mixed driving, the Ford Puma is likely a slightly better choice. For drivers with high annual mileage, both diesels are excellent, but here too, Ford has a slight edge. However, the fuel consumption is not so dramatically different as to be the sole deciding factor. Both cars offer modern and relatively economical power units, and the final choice will depend more on personal preferences in design, comfort, and driving characteristics.

Ford Puma vs. Peugeot 2008: Used Car Price Comparison

When deciding between the Ford Puma and the Peugeot 2008, the price of a used car plays a key role. Both models are popular crossovers, but their price tags on the used car market can vary depending on the year of manufacture, equipment, engine, and overall condition. Let's take a look at how they stand on the Czech used car market.

Price Range

Generally, the Ford Puma and Peugeot 2008 are in very similar price ranges at used car dealerships, which makes the decision even more interesting.

• Ford Puma (2019 - present): The prices of used Ford Puma models, especially those around four years old, start at approximately €14,000. For this price, you usually get a basic trim and engine. Better-equipped versions, such as the popular ST-Line with more powerful engines and richer features, can then climb to €21,000 or more, depending on the mileage and specific year of manufacture.
• Peugeot 2008 (2nd generation, 2019 - present): The second generation of the Peugeot 2008 is also a strong contender on the used car market. The oldest and most affordable models from the first years of production (around 2020) can be purchased for prices starting slightly below €16,000. The average price for a 2020 model is around €15,000. Higher trim levels, such as Allure or GT, with more attractive features and more powerful engines, typically range between €19,000 and €23,000.

What influences the price?

Several factors determine the price differences between the two models:

• Trim Level: Higher trim levels (ST-Line for the Puma, Allure and GT for the 2008) hold their value better due to a more attractive appearance and a richer set of features, such as digital instrument clusters, better infotainment systems, or advanced driver-assistance systems.
• Engine: The mild-hybrid EcoBoost engines in the Puma are more sought after for their dynamics and fuel efficiency. In the Peugeot 2008, both the PureTech petrol engines and the economical BlueHDi diesel variants are popular.
• History and Condition: A clear service history, low mileage, and an overall well-maintained condition can significantly increase the price for both competitors.

As a result, both models are very close in price. The deciding factor for a buyer will often be not just the specific price offer, but also personal preferences regarding design, driving characteristics, and interior space, where the two cars differ more.

Safety and Euro NCAP Results: Modern Technology Takes the Lead

When it comes to safety, both the Ford Puma and the Peugeot 2008 boast high ratings from the Euro NCAP organization. However, it is crucial to place these ratings in the correct context, as testing protocols are constantly becoming stricter over time. A direct comparison of percentage results from different years may not be entirely telling. A car tested under newer, more stringent rules might score fewer points yet be safer in the real world than an older car with a higher score.

Ford Puma (tested 2022)

The Ford Puma was originally tested in 2019, when it received five stars. However, in 2022, it underwent new, more demanding testing under stricter protocols, which resulted in a four-star rating. This result does not reflect the Puma becoming a less safe car, but rather that the standards for assistance systems and the protection of vulnerable road users have advanced. Even with four stars, the Puma offers a solid level of protection. In the subcategories, it achieved 75% for adult occupant protection, 84% for child protection, 70% for vulnerable road user protection, and 69% for safety assist systems. This newer rating provides a more relevant picture of its capabilities in the context of modern safety expectations.

Peugeot 2008 (tested 2019)

The Peugeot 2008 underwent Euro NCAP crash tests in 2019 and came away with two ratings. In its standard equipment, it received four stars, but with the optional "Safety Pack," it achieved a full five stars. For comparison, the five-star version is the relevant one, achieving excellent results: 93% for adult protection, 84% for child protection, 73% for vulnerable road users, and 73% for safety assist systems. However, it should be emphasized that this rating was conducted under older and less demanding rules than the Puma's more recent test. Furthermore, according to Euro NCAP rules, the validity of the 2019 rating expired at the beginning of 2026.

Verdict and Comparison Table

Although the Peugeot 2008 with the optional package achieved better percentage results on paper and five stars, its test is older. The Ford Puma, on the other hand, was tested against more modern and stricter criteria, making its four-star rating from 2022 a more current indicator of safety. For a used car buyer, both models offer a high standard of protection, but the Puma's valid rating better reflects its readiness for the challenges of modern traffic and its sophistication in active safety.

In addition to standard equipment, each model offers several unique features that can be decisive for a customer, as they focus on different aspects of daily use and driving experience.

Ford Puma: Emphasis on Practicality and Driving Pleasure

The Ford Puma attracts with its clever solutions and agile driving characteristics, which stem from its technical foundation in the popular Fiesta model.

• MegaBox for Unmatched Practicality: One of the Puma's biggest assets is the 80-litre, fully washable compartment under the boot floor with a drain plug. It's ideal for transporting dirty boots, wet sports equipment, or even tall items like plants that can fit upright.
• EcoBoost Mild-Hybrid Technology: The Puma was one of the first cars in its class to widely adopt a mild-hybrid powertrain. The system helps reduce fuel consumption while providing additional torque during acceleration, contributing to a feeling of liveliness and better engine dynamics.
• Massage Seats for Maximum Comfort: In higher trim levels, the Puma offers a feature that is unusual in the small SUV segment – lumbar massage for the driver and front passenger. This makes long journeys significantly more comfortable.
• ST Sport Version: For drivers craving a true sports experience, there is the ST version with 200 horsepower, a sport-tuned chassis, and a limited-slip differential (as an option). It offers a level of fun behind the wheel that is hard for the competition to match.
• Switchable driving modes: The driver can choose from several modes (Normal, Eco, Sport, Slippery, and Trail), which adjust the throttle response, steering, and traction control, allowing the car's behavior to be adapted to current conditions.

Peugeot 2008: Futuristic Design and Technological Comfort

The Peugeot 2008 focuses on bold design and modern technologies that create the impression of a higher-category vehicle.

• Peugeot i-Cockpit® 3D: The interior is dominated by an innovative instrument cluster that displays information in several layers, creating a 3D effect. The most important data, such as speed or warnings from assistance systems, are projected to the foreground, which improves readability and shortens the driver's reaction time.
• “Toggle Switches”: The center console is adorned with elegant controls resembling piano keys. They allow quick and intuitive access to main functions such as air conditioning, navigation, or the radio, and give the interior a premium feel.
• Fully electric e-2008 version: Unlike the Puma, the Peugeot 2008 has also offered a purely electric version since the start of production. The e-2008 model provides quiet and smooth operation with no local emissions, making it an ideal choice for urban and suburban driving.
• Advanced assistance systems: In higher trim levels, the Drive Assist Plus package is available, which combines adaptive cruise control with a Stop & Go function and a lane-keeping system. The car is thus capable of semi-autonomous driving, which increases comfort and safety on highways.
• Design language and materials: Peugeot places great emphasis on the visual aspect and quality of materials. The distinctive grille, the "lion's claw" light signature, and the use of soft-touch plastics or ambient lighting in the interior create a feeling of luxury and modernity.

Ford Puma

Advantages:

• Excellent driving characteristics: The Puma excels in handling and fun. The chassis, shared with the Fiesta, offers agility and responds eagerly to steering inputs, making it one of the most engaging crossovers to drive in its segment.
• Large and practical boot: The luggage compartment has a volume of 456 litres, which is a top figure in its class. The unique "MegaBox" compartment under the floor is particularly noteworthy; it is washable and has a drain plug, making it ideal for dirty or wet items.
• Economical and lively engines: The one-litre EcoBoost engines, often with mild-hybrid technology, provide decent dynamics while maintaining reasonable fuel consumption. They are refined and perfectly adequate for powering this lightweight car.
• Precise manual shifting: The six-speed manual gearbox is characterized by precise and short throws, which adds to the driving pleasure.
• Practical interior ergonomics: The dashboard is well-organized, and controlling most functions (especially in pre-facelift models) remains intuitive thanks to physical buttons.

Disadvantages:

• Cramped rear seat space: Compared to competitors like the Peugeot 2008, the Puma offers less legroom and headroom for rear passengers.
• Cheaper-feeling interior materials: The cabin contains a larger amount of hard plastics, especially on the door panels and the upper part of the dashboard, which detracts from the premium feel.
• Stiffer suspension on ST-Line versions: The sportier versions can be less comfortable on poor-quality roads due to the stiffer suspension and larger wheels.
• Interior design could be more modern: The dashboard is largely carried over from the older Fiesta, which can feel somewhat dated compared to the avant-garde approach of the Peugeot.

Peugeot 2008

Advantages:

• Attractive and premium design: The Peugeot 2008 features a distinctive and modern exterior and interior design that feels more upscale than many of its competitors.
• High-quality and futuristic interior (i-Cockpit): Inside, the sophisticated dashboard impresses with high-quality materials, a 3D digital instrument cluster, and an original design that evokes the feeling of a car from a higher class.
• Good ride comfort: The suspension is tuned more for comfort, effectively filtering out most bumps and ensuring a smooth ride.
• More spacious interior for passengers: Compared to the Puma, the 2008 offers more space for rear passengers, both in terms of legroom and headroom.
• Solid boot volume: The basic boot volume of 434 litres is a very good figure for its class.

Disadvantages:

• Controversial i-Cockpit ergonomics: The specific position with a small steering wheel and gauges viewed over it may not suit every body type; some drivers complain about poor visibility of the instruments.
• Risks associated with 1.2 PureTech engines: Older versions of these engines had problems with the timing belt, which could disintegrate and clog the oil channels. A thorough service history is crucial.
• Less engaging driving dynamics: The steering and chassis do not offer the same feedback and agility as the Ford Puma; the driving experience is rather calm and neutral.
• More complex cruise control and climate controls: Operating the cruise control with a stalk behind the steering wheel, which is out of sight, is impractical. In newer versions, adjusting the air conditioning via the touchscreen while driving can be tedious.

Based on our own CarAudit inspections, reliability statistics, and owner feedback, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems that used car buyers should watch out for. Although both models are popular in the small SUV segment, they have not escaped some typical issues.

Ford Puma (from 2019)

The Ford Puma generally has a decent reputation, but a few areas require increased attention when buying a used car. The problems mainly concern the EcoBoost engine and the electronics.

• 1.0 EcoBoost Engine: The most discussed topic is the timing belt immersed in oil (the "wet belt"). When it degrades, rubber particles can enter the oil system, clog lubrication channels or the oil pump strainer, and in extreme cases, cause serious engine damage. It is strongly recommended to shorten the belt replacement interval compared to the manufacturer's recommendation and to use only the prescribed engine oil. There are also cases of coolant leaks, which can lead to overheating.
• Gearbox: Owners of cars with automatic transmissions sometimes complain about jerky or hesitant shifting, especially at low speeds. With manual gearboxes, synchronization problems have rarely occurred, manifesting as difficulty shifting into second gear.
• Mild-hybrid system: Early models had problems with the 12V battery draining, which could lead to a failure to start. Ford addressed this issue with a software update and by replacing the batteries with a more durable type.
• Electronics and infotainment: The SYNC 3 system can occasionally freeze or restart on its own. A software restart or update sometimes solves the problems, but in some cases, a visit to the service center is necessary. Occasional issues with connecting via Apple CarPlay or Android Auto are also reported.
• Chassis and bodywork: Some owners report squeaking noises from the brakes even when the pads are fine, or noise from the chassis when driving over bumps. With the first units, there were also complaints about the paint quality, especially peeling on the lower edges of the doors.

Summary for the Ford Puma: Most of the Puma's problems are more of an annoying nature. However, a thorough technical inspection of the car and a check of its service history are key, especially because of the 1.0 EcoBoost engine and its specific maintenance requirements.

Peugeot 2008 (from 2019)

The second generation of the Peugeot 2008 is a big leap in design and technology, but unfortunately, it struggles with several more serious and well-known problems, especially with its petrol engines.

• 1.2 PureTech Engine: Similar to the Ford, the main scare here is the timing belt in an oil bath. This engine is infamous for premature belt degradation, with its particles clogging the oil pump's intake strainer. This leads to a loss of oil pressure and can end in fatal engine damage. The problem manifests itself with the oil pressure warning light coming on and a loss of power. The only solution is a preventive and significantly shortened belt replacement and strict adherence to the oil specification. The engines can also suffer from higher oil consumption.
• Electronics and infotainment: Electrical faults are quite common in Peugeots. Owners report problems with the central touchscreen, which can freeze, go black, or become unresponsive, complicating the control of the air conditioning and other functions. The i-Cockpit digital instrument cluster also acts up at times, with the screen flickering or fading.
• Chassis: Cases of suspension problems have been recorded, although this is not a widespread issue. A physical inspection of the used car focusing on play in the chassis components is important.
• Air conditioning: Some cars have experienced problems with the air conditioning system, ranging from refrigerant leaks to compressor failure.

Summary for the Peugeot 2008: While the Ford Puma faces more minor inconveniences, the 1.2 PureTech engine in the Peugeot 2008 poses a serious risk of expensive repairs. An independent inspection of the car's technical condition is an absolute must here, with a special focus on the documented history of oil changes and the condition of the timing belt. Electrical faults are more of a nuisance, but they can spoil the overall impression of an otherwise well-made car.

When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key. Even though these are relatively modern crossovers, both models have their specific areas that are good to focus on to prevent expensive repairs in the future.

When choosing a Ford Puma:

• Check the behaviour of the mild-hybrid system: Focus on the function of the start-stop system and the smoothness of recuperation during braking. Older units had problems with the 12V battery, which the mild-hybrid system did not charge sufficiently, leading to starting problems. Any warning messages regarding the battery or charging are a reason for caution.
• Thoroughly test the automatic transmission: The seven-speed dual-clutch Powershift transmission should shift smoothly and without hesitation. During the test drive, try slow uphill starts as well as sharper acceleration. Jerking, jerky shifting, or delayed reactions can signal impending clutch wear or a problem with the mechatronics.
• Listen to the chassis: On uneven surfaces, such as speed bumps or cobblestones, focus on any knocking or creaking from the axles. Some cars suffered from noisier suspension, which could mean worn-out bushings or other components. A thorough technical inspection of the car should reveal any play.
• Check the infotainment and electronics: Try all the features of the SYNC 3 system. Try pairing your phone via Bluetooth, turning on the navigation, and controlling the air conditioning. A freezing screen, slow responses, or connection problems may require a software update or, in the worst case, a hardware intervention.

When choosing a Peugeot 2008:

• The most important thing is the 1.2 PureTech engine: This engine is famous for its oil-immersed timing belt. It is absolutely crucial to verify the service history and make sure that the precisely prescribed oil was used on time. Neglected maintenance leads to the disintegration of the belt, clogging of the oil pump, and fatal engine damage. Also, listen to see if the engine rattles after starting and if it runs smoothly.
• Check the EAT8 automatic transmission: The eight-speed Aisin automatic is generally reliable, but watch for smooth shifting during the test drive. Especially during slow city driving or when downshifting, there should be no jerking. Check whether the oil in the gearbox was changed on time if the car has higher mileage.
• Test the air conditioning and electronics: Make sure the air conditioning starts cooling quickly and efficiently. Some cars have had problems with the compressor or refrigerant leaks. Also, click through the entire infotainment system and the i-Cockpit digital instrument cluster. Any freezing or glitches could indicate a software problem.
• Look for signs of leaks and strange noises: Some owners have reported creaks and rattles from the dashboard area, especially in colder weather. While driving over bumps, listen for any distracting noises from the interior. As part of the physical inspection of the used car, also check the area under the carpets for dampness.

Sources: ADAC, motor1.com, carbuyer.co.uk, thetruthaboutcars.com, caranddriver.com, chargedevs.com

This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.