
Mercedes-Benz EQE vs. Porsche Taycan: Complete comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Porsche Taycan. A detailed look at real-world range, performance, and equipment. Read our verdict and choose your winner!
Apr 14, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Detailed comparison of the BMW i7 and Mercedes-Benz EQS. Discover real-world range, luxury equipment details, and read our verdict. Which electric car to choose?
April 19, 2026


The BMW i7, the all-electric variant of the seventh generation of the prestigious 7 Series (designated as the G70 generation), embodies the absolute pinnacle of Munich's approach to zero-emission luxury and advanced technology. Its direct challenger is the Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297 generation), the flagship of the EQ family, which brought a revolutionary aerodynamic design to the segment and is often referred to as the all-electric equivalent of the S-Class. In the following comparison, we will take a detailed look at which of these roughly four-year-old premium electric vehicles represents a smarter choice on the used car market and highlight the main differences that should help you in your final decision.
When you park the BMW i7 and Mercedes-Benz EQS side by side, you will notice a completely different approach to design and external proportions at first glance. While Mercedes-Benz bets on an aerodynamic teardrop shape with a short front end, BMW maintains a majestic, classic three-box body with a massive and long hood. This difference in concept is also clearly reflected in the specifications. The BMW i7 is literally gigantic in length – it measures 5,391 mm, which is a significant 168 to 175 mm more than the EQS model (which measures 5,216 mm in model years typical for the used car market, and 5,223 mm for AMG versions or newer models).
In terms of width and height, the Munich representative also has the upper hand. With a width of 1,950 mm and a height of 1,544 mm, it surpasses the Mercedes by 24 mm in width and about 30 mm in height. Where both luxury electric limousines surprisingly meet, however, is the wheelbase. Despite the significantly longer body of the BMW, its wheelbase is 3,215 mm, which is only 5 mm more than the EQS model (3,210 mm). Thanks to the radical cab-forward design, Mercedes-Benz managed to extract practically identical space between the front and rear wheels from a slightly shorter car.
What do these values mean for everyday life? Thanks to its taller build and classic roof profile, the BMW i7 offers a more generous sense of airiness and more headroom for rear passengers, which you will especially appreciate when using the car with a personal chauffeur. The price for this comfort, however, is a length of nearly 5.4 meters, which presents a significant challenge in narrow city streets or older underground garages. The Mercedes-Benz EQS is slightly more parking-friendly thanks to its more compact external dimensions, although it is still a very large car. The advantage of the EQS is its practical hatchback (liftback) body with a huge tailgate, which provides incomparably better access to the luggage compartment than a classic sedan.
| Parameter | BMW i7 Sedan | Mercedes-Benz EQS Hatchback |
|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 5391 | 5216 - 5223 |
| Width (mm) | 1950 | 1926 |
| Height (mm) | 1544 | 1512 - 1520 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 3215 | 3210 |
When choosing a luxury electric vehicle, the volume and accessibility of the luggage compartment play a surprisingly important role, not only for family use but also for everyday practicality. While it is customary in this prestigious class to prioritize rear-seat passenger space, the different approaches of car manufacturers can fundamentally influence how easily you can load golf bags, a stroller, or luggage for a long vacation. Here, two completely different worlds face off – the traditional Munich limousine and the innovative Stuttgart five-door liftback.
BMW i7 (G70 generation) honors the classic three-box sedan body style and offers a base trunk volume of exactly 500 liters. It is worth noting here that the pure electric i7 version has a slightly reduced trunk volume due to the space requirements for battery storage – the internal combustion version of the 7 Series offers a slightly better 540 liters. Even so, the 500-liter value is quite sufficient for transporting luggage for a business trip or a weekend shopping run. In contrast, the Mercedes-Benz EQS (297 generation) benefits from its rounded aerodynamic body, which is technically a hatchback with a huge liftgate. Thanks to this solution, it offers a generous 610 liters in its base configuration (some measurement methodologies even state 620 liters), which represents space for several extra suitcases compared to its Bavarian competitor and opens the door to much more versatile family use.
However, the biggest gap occurs when you need to transport bulkier items. In the Mercedes EQS, the rear seats can be conveniently folded down, giving you a massive maximum volume of 1,770 liters – a value that is sufficient for a weekend trip to a DIY store as well as a very long vacation with equipment. The BMW i7, on the other hand, plays the role of a classic sedan for top executives, where the primary focus is maximum uncompromising passenger comfort. Therefore, it does not offer the option of folding the bench flat to maximize volume and relies primarily on a useful ski or snowboard pass-through for transporting longer items. Consequently, the manufacturer does not even state an official maximum volume after folding flat for the BMW i7, and the owner must primarily count on the base trunk capacity.
| Parameter | BMW i7 Sedan | Mercedes-Benz EQS Hatchback |
|---|---|---|
| Base volume (liters) | 500 | 610 |
| Max volume with seats folded down (liters) | 500* | 1770 |
*The BMW i7 has a classic sedan construction focused on maximum rear passenger comfort. Fully folding seats for a flat increase in cargo space are not available as standard; only the center pass-through for long items can be used.
If you plan to use the car not only for prestige but also for more frequent transport of bulkier items, the Mercedes-Benz EQS will thrill you with its extremely practical body and giant trunk. The BMW i7, on the other hand, remains faithful to classic limousine shapes and traditions, where the trunk serves purely as a luxurious and separate space for several elegant personal suitcases.
When choosing a luxury electric sedan, towing capacity might not be the first parameter that comes to mind, but trailer weight plays a fundamental role in the car's overall practicality. There are significant differences between the BMW i7 and Mercedes-Benz EQS in this area. For used cars around four years old, which are most common on the market (model years 2021–2023), the Mercedes-Benz EQS offers a maximum braked and unbraked trailer weight of only 750 kg across its standard versions. In contrast, the BMW i7 in the xDrive60 motorization (available since 2022) clearly dominates with the ability to tow a braked trailer weighing up to 2000 kg, while the standard value for an unbraked trailer for both cars remains at the usual 750 kg.
It should be noted that towing capacities for these electric vehicles can vary significantly depending on the production year and the specific powertrain variant. For newer versions of the Mercedes-Benz EQS (from 2024), the manufacturer increased the limit for all-wheel-drive versions (450, 500, 580, and 53 AMG) to a much more usable 1700 kg, though the base rear-wheel-drive model (EQS 450+) remains limited to the original 750 kg. In the case of the BMW i7, homologated trailer values for the M70 xDrive and eDrive50 motorizations are not standardly listed in technical specifications and do not appear on the market, which is why they are omitted from the comparison below, and the text focuses on the fully defined xDrive60 version.
In practice, this means that the limited 750 kg capacity of older EQS models makes the car more suitable for a small utility trailer or an e-bike rack. Conversely, the high 2000 kg capacity of the BMW i7 offers the driver much greater flexibility. You can easily hitch a heavier caravan or create ideal space for several extra suitcases in a larger lockable trailer, with a load capacity that is more than sufficient for weekend shopping or a long family holiday.
In summary, if towing heavier loads and vehicle versatility are priorities for you—and you are looking at vehicles around four years old—a used BMW i7 is a much more reliable and practical choice than the older Mercedes EQS models of that era, where you would need to seek out the latest facelifted models from 2024 to achieve even partially comparable towing capacity.
| Model and motorization | Braked weight of trailer (kg) | Unbraked weight of trailer (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| BMW i7 xDrive60 | 2000 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 350 / 450+ | 750 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 450 / 500 / 53 AMG / 580 (2021 - 2023) | 750 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 450 / 500 / 53 AMG / 580 (2024 - present) | 1700 | 750 |
When comparing the powertrains of these two flagship electric limousines, a slightly different approach by both manufacturers is evident, which fundamentally influences the choice on the used car market. While the BMW i7 (G70 generation) enters the fray with uncompromising performance even in its base version and focuses on drivers requiring maximum dynamics under all circumstances, the Mercedes-Benz EQS (V297 generation) offers a much wider spectrum of performance levels. This gives customers the opportunity to better choose between absolute range and brutal power. Technically, both models exclusively use single-speed automatic transmissions typical for electric vehicles and lithium-ion batteries with a huge capacity exceeding 100 kWh (usable) in most versions. For those interested in a car roughly four years old, this means that while with BMW you get over 330 kW even in the base model, with Mercedes you can also opt for more efficient versions with lower power, which conversely dominate the range charts.
The range of power units for the Bavarian limousine is clear and relies fully on massive performance. The standard powertrain starts with the eDrive50 model with rear-wheel drive, which has a very solid output of 335 kW. If you require all-wheel traction, the xDrive60 version is available with two electric motors and a total output of 400 kW. The top of the range is the M70 xDrive model from the M division. This sport-tuned giant provides 485 kW and a staggering 1,015 Nm of torque, thanks to which this three-ton colossus accelerates to 100 km/h in an incredible 3.7 seconds. All BMW i7 models from these years share a giant battery with a usable capacity of 101.7 kWh, ensuring consistent behavior across the entire range.
| Powertrain | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| i7 eDrive50 | Electricity | 335 | 650 | 1-speed automatic |
| i7 xDrive60 | Electricity | 400 | 745 | 1-speed automatic |
| i7 M70 xDrive | Electricity | 485 | 1015 | 1-speed automatic |
The Stuttgart competitor approaches powertrains with greater variability and focuses much more on customers demanding maximum highway efficiency. The entry point between 2021 and 2022 was the EQS 350 model equipped with a smaller battery with a usable capacity of 90.6 kWh and an output of 215 kW. This variant is no longer produced as new, but you are guaranteed to come across it on the market for nearly-new used cars around four years old. Other models then rely on a giant battery with a usable capacity of 107.8 kWh. Among drivers preferring extreme range, the EQS 450+ version with rear-wheel drive (245 kW) will be particularly sought after, offering one of the best drag coefficients and a phenomenal real-world range. For proponents of 4MATIC all-wheel drive, variants are available with outputs from 265 kW (EQS 450) up to 385 kW for the EQS 580 model. For those who still want more, there is the EQS 53 4MATIC+ variant from the AMG division, whose output can reach 560 kW and a monstrous 1,020 Nm thanks to the optional Dynamic Plus package.
| Powertrain | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EQS 350* | Electricity | 215 | 565 | 1-speed automatic |
| EQS 450+ | Electricity | 245 | 568 | 1-speed automatic |
| EQS 450 4MATIC | Electricity | 265 | 800 | 1-speed automatic |
| EQS 500 4MATIC | Electricity | 330 | 828 | 1-speed automatic |
| EQS 580 4MATIC | Electricity | 385 | 855 | 1-speed automatic |
| EQS 53 AMG 4MATIC+ | Electricity | 484 / 560 | 950 / 1020 | 1-speed automatic |
* The EQS 350 model was only offered until 2022.
While the Mercedes-Benz EQS offers a wider range of versions from extremely efficient highway cruisers to the ferocious AMG, the BMW i7 bets on a simpler offering where even the absolute base provides more than confident performance and premium dynamics.
Choosing the right motorization is critical for used luxury electric vehicles for long-term satisfaction, as it directly affects real-world range, dynamics, and future service costs. The BMW i7 and Mercedes-Benz EQS share similarly massive batteries (with a usable capacity of over 100 kWh), but they approach electric propulsion quite differently. While Mercedes bets on radical aerodynamics and maximum efficiency for highway travel, BMW prioritizes a classic majestic presence, uncompromising comfort, and massive power at the expense of absolute range. Our recommendation for roughly four-year-old used cars is based on real owner experiences, actual on-road consumption, and the overall mechanical reliability of the first production years.
Official consumption values provided by manufacturers according to the WLTP standard always look very tempting on paper, but everyday reality on the roads tends to be different. For large luxury electric vehicles weighing well over two tons, aerodynamics, driving style, and weather conditions play a key role. To get a more accurate picture of how much energy these technological flagships actually need to operate, we looked at real user data from the well-known community portal Spritmonitor.de and from long-term independent tests. We took into account data for vehicles of both generations (Mercedes-Benz 297 from 2021–present and BMW i7 G70 from 2022), which are now frequently entering the pre-owned vehicle market.
| Model and Engine | Average Consumption (kWh/100 km) |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 450+ | 19.5 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 450 4MATIC | 20.8 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 500 4MATIC | 21.0 |
| BMW i7 eDrive50 | 21.0 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 580 4MATIC | 21.5 |
| BMW i7 xDrive60 | 22.5 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQS 53 AMG | 24.0 |
| BMW i7 M70 xDrive | 24.5 |
Looking at the real-world figures, one trend clearly stands out: aerodynamics and the efficiency of the electric drivetrain play an extremely important role for these massive highway cruisers. Thanks to its radical teardrop shape (with one of the best drag coefficients on the market), the Mercedes-Benz EQS achieves top-tier efficiency. In particular, the base EQS 450+ version with rear-wheel drive proves to be an absolute long-distance champion, with its real-world consumption staying relatively easily below the 20 kWh/100 km mark. Surprisingly, however, even the boxier, majestic-looking BMW i7 performs very well – the xDrive60 model is relatively efficient despite its more angular front grille, although it logically loses out slightly to the absolute efficiency of the Mercedes. For both manufacturers, a clear rule applies regarding the top-of-the-line engines. If you choose the extremely powerful Mercedes-AMG EQS 53 or BMW i7 M70 xDrive models, you must expect a significant increase in appetite, which in practice reliably attacks or exceeds 24 kWh/100 km. This confirms that entry-level engines with only one driven axle really do save precious energy and maximize range.
For typical users, this brings several key insights. If you are a highway mile-muncher driving long international routes across Europe, the EQS 450+ will undoubtedly be the most practical choice – its low consumption saves time at chargers and significantly extends the viable range. However, if you use the vehicle for representation more within the city and suburban highway stretches, the difference in aerodynamics does not play such a role at lower speeds. The classically styled BMW i7 will provide you with immense comfort here without its aerodynamic handicap resulting in a frustrating reduction in range. For those looking for a middle ground in the market for three- to four-year-old used cars, models like the EQS 580 or i7 xDrive60 are available – they offer overwhelming dynamics and the traction of all-wheel drive while keeping consumption within reasonable limits.
In conclusion, it can be summarized that for luxury vessels with prices exceeding €82,000, it is naturally not primarily about saving a few cents on electricity, but about the most important thing for every electric vehicle: freedom and time. The Mercedes-Benz EQS wins the consumption comparison thanks to its uncompromising approach to aerodynamics and thus represents a more efficient choice. The BMW i7, on the other hand, sacrifices roughly 1 to 2 kWh per 100 kilometers for its classic and confident design. While this difference means slightly more frequent or longer charging, if you primarily prefer a monumental appearance and a traditional interior without compromises, the BMW's consumption is certainly not so high as to disqualify this model as a full-fledged executive electric vehicle in any way.
Looking at the market for roughly four-year-old luxury electric vehicles reveals interesting differences in residual value. Both flagships, as new cars in well-equipped specifications, commonly approached the €144,000 to €165,000 mark. On the secondary market, however, their price tags are beginning to diverge significantly. It is necessary to take into account that the Mercedes-Benz EQS entered the market slightly earlier (during 2021) than the BMW i7 (not until the end of 2022), which is logically reflected in a wider range of older and more affordable units with the three-pointed star logo.
When choosing a used electric flagship, the most critical factor for both models is a documented service history and the condition of the high-voltage battery. The good news is that for four-year-old cars, both manufacturers should still easily cover the full warranty on the traction battery, which for these flagships usually amounts to 10 years or an impressive 250,000 kilometres (depending on the specific conditions at the time of purchase).
| Model | Estimated starting price of a used car | Most common price range | Top versions (AMG / M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-Benz EQS | €58,000 | €62,000 – €74,000 | €91,000 and more |
| BMW i7 | €91,000 | €95,000 – €119,000 | €128,000 and more |
The Mercedes-Benz EQS attracts buyers on the used car market with a significantly more attractive purchase price thanks to its earlier market arrival and faster depreciation, while the BMW i7 remains a noticeably more expensive and exclusive choice for more demanding buyers.
For premium electric limousines, which often serve as a showcase for the most modern technologies, five-star safety is considered an absolute given. However, when looking at independent crash tests, it is crucial to observe the broader context. The Euro NCAP testing methodology is constantly evolving and becoming significantly stricter over the years. The organization regularly introduces new and more demanding simulations for frontal and side impacts, places greater emphasis on sophisticated cyclist detection, and evaluates complex crisis scenarios at intersections. For this reason, percentage results from different years cannot be directly compared – a rating obtained under an older protocol may no longer represent the same level of protection as a rating developed according to the strictest current standards.
The Mercedes-Benz EQS underwent Euro NCAP testing in 2021 and, as expected, took home a full five-star rating. The flagship of the Stuttgart brand excelled exceptionally in adult occupant protection, where it achieved an impressive score of 96%. The car also provided significant support in child protection (91%). Although the testing took place before the introduction of the latest strict methodologies for active accident prevention systems, the model still achieved an excellent 80% in the safety assist category. An extremely rigid body combined with a rich array of radar systems from that time means that even today, the EQS remains one of the safest cars on the road in terms of passive protection.
In the case of the BMW i7, the situation is different. Due to its high purchase price and relatively low production volumes in the context of the general automotive market, this ultra-luxury version has not been officially tested by Euro NCAP to date. This is common practice; testing laboratories usually do not select vehicles with a price tag exceeding a certain threshold for independent testing, and car manufacturers do not supply them at their own expense. Customers must therefore rely on the fact that the Munich brand extensively shares its platform and safety features with smaller models that have completed the tests with excellent results (e.g., the iX SUV model). Since no official data is available for the BMW i7, we indicate the absence of results in the following comparison.
| Parameter | BMW i7 | Mercedes-Benz EQS |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | - | 2021 |
| Adult occupant protection | - | 96 % |
| Child occupant protection | - | 91 % |
| Vulnerable road users protection | - | 76 % |
| Safety assist systems | - | 80 % |
Note: Due to the lack of official Euro NCAP tests for the BMW i7, we do not provide any data for this car in the table.
The Mercedes-Benz EQS provides a huge advantage for a used car in the form of transparent and top-tier data directly from the Euro NCAP laboratories from 2021. While the BMW i7 lacks a formal five-star certificate, it entered the market later on a slightly more modern technological architecture. Thanks to the integration of even newer assistance features, more powerful sensors for semi-autonomous driving, and more advanced predictive systems, the i7 offers a more comprehensive and modern active safety package by current standards. In both cases, however, you are choosing massive electric limousines where the manufacturers have not allowed the slightest compromise in the protection of human life.
While the Mercedes-Benz EQS scores with clearly documented crash test results, the newer BMW i7, even without official measurements, provides a step forward in modern and sophisticated protection through the most advanced assistance technologies.
Beyond standard equipment, both flagship electric models offer much more than just basic premium luxury, with each having its own, completely different approach to innovation, comfort, and overall added value.
This Munich-based electric vehicle focuses on maximum visual impact and transforming the rear seats into a full-fledged living room.
While BMW focuses on rear passengers, the Mercedes-Benz EQS strikes a chord with futuristic driver-oriented design and extreme technological sophistication.
Exceptionally comfortable and quiet ride thanks to top-tier soundproofing and air suspension
Magnificent luxury interior with premium materials and unique technologies (e.g., the fold-down Theatre Screen)
Unrivaled and natural seating position in the rear, surpassing most electric competitors
More traditional approach to ergonomics, combining modern displays with the proven iDrive rotary controller
Excellent driving characteristics that mask the car's extreme dimensions and weight
Highly polarizing exterior design with a giant grille and split headlights
Use of a shared platform with the internal combustion 7 Series means design compromises, including the absence of a front trunk (frunk)
Aerodynamically less efficient body results in slightly higher consumption and shorter range than pure electric platforms
Huge curb weight (over 2.7 tons) is noticeable during emergency braking and dynamic direction changes
The BMW i7 is an uncompromising choice for those seeking a traditional, majestic limousine with an emphasis on absolute luxury and comfort for rear passengers. It will primarily appeal to executives and demanding buyers who require the classic feel of a luxury car brought into the electric era and don't mind a more extravagant exterior appearance.
Record-low drag coefficient ensuring excellent efficiency and a very long range
Dedicated electric platform provides a flat floor and optimal use of interior space in the front
Highly practical liftback body with a huge loading opening and a spacious trunk
Technologically fascinating MBUX onboard system with the optional seamless Hyperscreen
Surprising agility in narrow city streets thanks to rear-axle steering of up to 10 degrees
Aerodynamic "capsule" shape lacks the representative aura and traditional proportions of flagships
High-mounted batteries and a sloping roofline limit rear passenger comfort (less legroom and headroom)
Unintuitive and rubbery brake pedal feel due to specific recuperation tuning, which takes a long time to get used to
Fit and finish and creaking of some interior plastics do not reach the traditional standards of the internal combustion S-Class
The Mercedes-Benz EQS is ideal for tech enthusiasts and drivers who mostly travel long distances and appreciate maximum range and overall powertrain efficiency. Thanks to its practical trunk and great agility, it makes more sense for daily personal driving, but it does not reach the level of limousine comfort in the rear seats as its Bavarian rival.
Based on long-term user experience, service reports, recall records, and independent technical inspection of the car, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems that used car buyers should watch out for.
The BMW i7 is a technologically exceptionally advanced electric vehicle, whose most common teething problems in roughly four-year-old used cars primarily concern complex electronics and extreme curb weight.
BMW's flagship primarily suffers from teething problems with complicated software and rapid tire wear due to high weight. From a purely mechanical standpoint and in terms of high-voltage battery degradation, however, the i7 has so far proven to be highly reliable.
The Mercedes-Benz EQS shares a similar fate to its Munich rival – a mechanically robust electric foundation is occasionally overshadowed in early model years by the whims of modern equipment and the toll of a heavy chassis.
The EQS is a top-tier aerodynamic and comfortable cruiser, where buyers must especially check the functionality of the delicate retractable handles and the stability of the MBUX system. The car is overall very reliable if it has a flawlessly documented service history and key software updates.
When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key. Although electric vehicles are more reliable in many respects from a powertrain mechanics perspective than internal combustion engine cars, both of these premium models have specific weak points due to the vast amount of complex electronics, and a comprehensive car inspection before purchase should be an absolute matter of course.
The Mercedes-Benz EQS dominates thanks to its exceptionally aerodynamic teardrop body, which allows the 450+ version, for example, to reliably exceed a range of 600 km on a single charge. The BMW i7 has slightly more traditional, bulky shapes and a higher weight, so its real-world combined range is closer to 500 to 550 km. For very frequent highway trips across Europe, the Mercedes is the more efficient choice overall.
The Mercedes-Benz EQS utilizes a liftback body style with a large tailgate, providing excellent access to a generous 610-liter trunk. In contrast, the BMW i7 remains faithful to the classic sedan concept with a smaller opening and a trunk volume of 500 liters. If you frequently need to load bulky luggage or sports equipment, the Mercedes is significantly more practical.
Both limousines offer premium comfort, but the BMW i7 is the absolute pinnacle for rear passengers, especially thanks to the massive 31.3-inch Theater Screen and better body proportions. While you will find top-tier seats in the Mercedes, its sharply sloping roofline unfortunately limits headroom for taller individuals. The Bavarian representative is therefore a much better choice if you will frequently be using a chauffeur.
BMW uses a universal shared platform, so the electric model looks almost identical to the classic 7 Series with internal combustion engines and maintains a majestic appearance. Mercedes developed the EQS from the ground up on a purely electric architecture, which allowed designers to create a unique aerodynamic shape with a short front end and a forward-positioned cabin. The decision thus depends on whether you prefer the classic proportions of a traditional luxury limousine or would rather choose a futuristic and strictly functional look.
Despite the car's immense weight, BMW retains part of its typical sporting DNA and offers surprising agility and confidence when cornering. Mercedes, on the other hand, is primarily tuned for perfect isolation from the outside world and maximum smoothness, making the driving experience feel more like a floating luxury yacht. You will enjoy winding roads more with the BMW, while the Mercedes is ideal for an absolutely relaxed ride without distractions.
Choosing between these two roughly four-year-old electric flagships depends primarily on whether you prefer a traditional concept of luxury or rather futuristic efficiency. The BMW i7 will impress you with uncompromising comfort for rear passengers, a classically majestic appearance, and a higher towing capacity, making it the ideal choice for demanding clients requiring a traditional representative limousine. In contrast, the Mercedes-Benz EQS excels with its aerodynamic body and unrivaled highway range, and since it adds a very practical five-door trunk along with currently more attractive prices on the used car market, it becomes the perfect companion for mileage eaters and daily use. Whether you choose the opulent Munich cinema on wheels or the technology-packed long-distance record-breaker from Stuttgart, in both cases, you get the absolute pinnacle of premium zero-emission engineering.
Sources: ADAC, aktualne.cz, denik.cz, dopravniinfo.cz, hybrid.cz, f1sport.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Detailed comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Porsche Taycan. A detailed look at real-world range, performance, and equipment. Read our verdict and choose your winner!
Apr 14, 2026

Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Tesla Model S: A detailed comparison of range, technology, and comfort. Our final verdict will help you choose the best electric car.
Apr 13, 2026

Porsche Taycan vs. Tesla Model S: Which electric car is better? We compared real-world range, performance, and equipment. Read our verdict and make your choice easier.
Apr 14, 2026