
Mercedes-Benz EQE vs. Porsche Taycan: Complete comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Porsche Taycan. A detailed look at real-world range, performance, and equipment. Read our verdict and choose your winner!
Apr 14, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Detailed comparison of Audi e-tron GT vs. BMW i5. Discover the differences in performance, range, and equipment. Read our verdict and choose the best electric car.
May 20, 2026


The Audi e-tron GT, which is also known to customers in its high-performance version as the RS e-tron GT, is a purely electric grand tourer combining thrilling dynamics with an exceptionally elegant design. Standing against it is the BMW i5, available and often referred to as the purely electric variant of the eighth generation of the popular 5 Series (with the internal code name G60), which focuses on a perfect balance of traditional executive luxury and cutting-edge digital technologies. The following comparison will provide a detailed look at the key parameters, driving characteristics, and overall daily practicality of both models to make your decision when choosing a modern premium electric vehicle as easy as possible.
When you place the Audi e-tron GT and BMW i5 side by side, you immediately notice diametrically different approaches to proportions and body construction. While Audi bets on an aggressive, wide, and very low stance typical of a thoroughbred sports gran turismo, BMW sticks more to the traditional form of the established executive class. With a length of 5,060 mm, the Munich representative is slightly longer than the e-tron GT (whose length ranges from 4,989 to 5,004 mm depending on the version). While this slightly greater length in the BMW may represent a minor disadvantage when parking in narrow parallel spots in the city, on the other hand, it brings desired benefits for interior spaciousness.
The fundamental differences that define the overall feel of the car are found primarily in the height and width of both cars. Audi, with its impressive 1,964 mm in width, is a noticeable 64 mm wider than the BMW (1,900 mm). This above-standard width combined with a very low roofline (the height of the e-tron GT ranges only between 1,379 and 1,413 mm compared to more than 1,500 mm for the BMW) ensures the Ingolstadt model has top-tier stability in sharp corners, a lower center of gravity, and excellent aerodynamics. From a user perspective, however, the higher roof and more conventional proportions of the BMW i5 make daily entry much easier and guarantee adult passengers a much airier headroom.
Looking at the wheelbase, the BMW i5 offers a value of 2,995 mm, which is almost 10 centimeters more than the Audi (2,898 to 2,900 mm). Passengers in the rear seats will benefit most from this generous parameter, as the "five" will offer them more generous legroom. So, if you are looking for a more practical and representative daily car on the used market around four years old, the BMW i5 makes much more sense thanks to its proportions and the option of an estate body style. Conversely, the Audi e-tron GT will perfectly appeal to those drivers who are willing to sacrifice some interior space in exchange for an uncompromising sporty look and driving dynamics.
| Parameter | Audi e-tron GT Sedan | BMW i5 Sedan | BMW i5 Estate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Width (mm) | 1964 | 1900 | 1900 |
| Length (mm) | 4989 - 5004 | 5060 | 5060 |
| Height (mm) | 1379 - 1413 | 1505 - 1515 | 1505 - 1515 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2898 - 2900 | 2995 | 2995 |
When choosing a premium electric vehicle on the used car market, practicality and luggage space often play a key role, especially if you are considering a car for family purposes or longer travel. The difference between a sporty grand tourer and a traditional executive car is quite fundamental in this discipline. While one model emphasizes aerodynamics and an elegant low silhouette, the other offers maximum everyday versatility and generous interior space that can easily accommodate the bulkier luggage of an entire family.
Looking at specific figures for cars suitable for today's used car market, the Audi e-tron GT (FW generation, 2021–2024), as a four-door sports coupé, has a basic boot capacity of 405 litres. However, it is important to mention that in sharper versions, such as the more modern RS e-tron GT Performance, this volume decreases to 350 litres. In contrast, the BMW i5 (G60/G61 generation introduced in 2023) benefits from a more traditional and boxier body concept and already offers a very solid 490 litres in the sedan version. If transport capacity is your absolute priority, the BMW i5 also offers a highly practical estate (Touring) variant. This offers 570 litres as standard, and once the rear seats are folded down, this space generously expands to an impressive 1,700 litres.
In practice, this means that the smaller boot of the Audi e-tron GT is perfectly sufficient for weekend shopping, short trips for two, or storing a few golf bags, but for a full family holiday, it may already require some compromises in luggage packing. The BMW i5 sedan provides valuable space for several extra suitcases and can comfortably handle longer holidays. The estate variant of the BMW is then the clear king for families – it easily swallows a bulky pram, large sports equipment, and supplies for a cottage trip. The decision between these cars will therefore primarily be a choice between an uncompromising sporty look and top-tier family logistics.
| Parameter | Audi e-tron GT Coupé | BMW i5 Sedan | BMW i5 Estate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Basic volume (litres) | 405 | 490 | 570 |
| Maximum volume with seats folded (litres) | Not specified | Not specified | 1700 |
If you are looking for a car for frequent family trips and transporting a pram, the more spacious BMW i5 (especially in the estate version) is the clear winner, while the Audi e-tron GT will appeal more to couples looking for a sporty drive with just enough space for a weekend.
Towing capacity and the ability to tow are key factors for many customers, whether they are planning a holiday with a family caravan or the occasional transport of heavier loads to a cottage. In this comparison, you will encounter a stark difference due to the different focus of both electric vehicles. The Audi e-tron GT (FW generation, 2021–2024) is designed as a purebred sports gran turismo, for which the manufacturer did not consider the installation of a tow bar at all. The car does not have factory homologation for towing, which is why you will not find this practical feature on it, and its towing capacity is an absolute 0 kg. In contrast, the BMW i5 (G60/G61 generation, sold since 2023) excels in everyday usability. Standard rear-wheel-drive electric versions like the eDrive40 can tow a braked trailer weighing 1,500 kg. However, if you opt for the all-wheel-drive variants (xDrive40 or the top-of-the-line sporty M60), you can reach a maximum braked trailer weight of an impressive 2,000 kg. The unbraked trailer weight is 750 kg for all engine versions of the Bavarian car. In practice, these differences mean that the BMW i5 serves as a workhorse – it frees up space for several extra suitcases in an additional trailer, easily handles a weekend purchase of building materials, and is perfectly sufficient for a longer holiday with a medium-sized caravan. With the Audi e-tron GT, you are purely dependent on the car's luggage compartment itself. In terms of choice, the conclusion is quite clear: if you plan on any towing with your electric car, the BMW i5 is the clear winner, while Audi completely omits this discipline at the expense of perfect aerodynamics and sportiness.
| Model and motorization | Braked weight of trailer (kg) | Unbraked weight of trailer (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| BMW i5 eDrive40 / Touring eDrive40 | 1500 | 750 |
| BMW i5 xDrive40 / Touring xDrive40 | 2000 | 750 |
| BMW i5 M60 / Touring M60 | 2000 | 750 |
Both cars represent two different yet fascinating approaches to luxury electric mobility, which is significantly reflected in their powertrain offerings. While the Audi e-tron GT, built on the same platform as the Porsche Taycan, has relied exclusively on a high-performance all-wheel-drive (quattro) concept and sporty technological solutions from the start, the BMW i5 approaches customers with a broader and more variable range. With the Bavarian representative, you can choose between a more efficient and calmer rear-wheel-drive version or opt for the powerful dual-motor xDrive models. A fundamental difference also lies in the gearbox used – Audi utilizes a unique two-speed automatic transmission on the rear axle, which optimizes dynamics and consumption at highway speeds, while BMW relies on a traditional and simpler single-speed reduction gear. From the perspective of someone interested in an approximately four-year-old used car, it is important to keep in mind that while the Audi e-tron GT entered the market as early as 2021 and offers immediate crushing performance, the 2023 BMW i5 also attracts with more rational rear-wheel-drive models for long-distance drivers.
The range of powertrains for the original Audi e-tron GT generation FW is straightforward and clearly focused on maximum performance. It is important to mention that the original specifications from 2021 to 2024 are no longer offered as new, as they were replaced by facelifted derivatives in the middle of the year. However, for the four-year-old used car market, these initial versions are key. Even the base e-tron GT quattro version uses a pair of electric motors with a total output of 350 kW and a generous torque of 630 Nm. If you are looking for dynamics comparable to supercars, the top-of-the-line RS e-tron GT version is available. This increases the power to a brutal 440 kW and torque to 830 Nm. Both variants benefit from an advanced 800V electrical architecture, which guarantees extremely fast charging, and the previously mentioned two-speed gearbox, which gives the car explosiveness even at higher speeds.
| Engine type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| e-tron GT quattro (AWD) | Electricity | 350 | 630 | 2-speed automatic |
| RS e-tron GT (AWD) | Electricity | 440 | 830 | 2-speed automatic |
The BMW i5 generation G60 (or G61 for the Touring version) models entered the market slightly later and cover a much wider spectrum of driving preferences. The cornerstone of the range is the i5 eDrive40 version with a single electric motor on the rear axle, an output of 250 kW, and a torque of 400 Nm. This configuration will primarily appeal to high-mileage drivers who appreciate the maximum possible range and traditional rear-wheel-drive behavior. In 2024, the range was supplemented by the i5 xDrive40 variant, which, thanks to a second motor at the front, brings the security of all-wheel drive and an increased output of 290 kW. At the very top stands the uncompromising BMW i5 M60 xDrive with a mammoth output of 442 kW and a torque of 795 Nm, which ably rivals even the much more expensive Audi RS e-tron GT. All i5 powertrains use a more conventional 400V architecture and a classic single-speed transmission.
| Engine type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| i5 eDrive40 (RWD) | Electricity | 250 | 400 | 1-speed automatic |
| i5 xDrive40 (AWD) | Electricity | 290 | 590 | 1-speed automatic |
| i5 M60 xDrive (AWD) | Electricity | 442 | 795 | 1-speed automatic |
While the Audi e-tron GT fascinates with the engineering sophistication of its two-speed gearbox and uncompromising performance even in the base version, the BMW i5 appeals with a wider selection and a more efficient rear-wheel-drive model for long-distance drivers.
Choosing the right powertrain is crucial for long-term satisfaction with the vehicle, and our recommendations are based on daily usability, real-world energy consumption, feedback from current owners, and overall operational reliability. Although both models represent the pinnacle of premium electromobility, they approach propulsion with different designs. While the Audi e-tron GT uses a purely electric platform with an advanced 800V architecture that allows for extremely fast charging at up to 270 kW, the BMW i5 relies on a slightly modified platform shared with internal combustion engine vehicles (CLAR) and a proven 400V network, which it compensates for with unrivaled efficiency and precise energy management. Looking at the used car market, considering an average age of around four years, clear favorites combining dynamics, reliability, and reasonable costs are emerging for both brands.
The base e-tron GT quattro (produced between 2021–2024) with 350 kW, which briefly rises to 390 kW (530 hp) during overboost with Launch Control, is by far the most practical choice for the used car market. Compared to the more aggressive and expensive RS e-tron GT version, it still provides breathtaking acceleration (0–100 km/h in 4.1 s), but with more favorable maintenance and insurance costs.
For the BMW i5, which only began production at the end of 2023 (note that on the used car market these will be significantly younger and often more expensive cars than the Audi), the purely rear-wheel-drive eDrive40 version makes the most sense. A perfectly sufficient 250 kW (340 hp) brings that unmistakable BMW character in a package that focuses maximally on comfort and operational efficiency.
For electric vehicles, much like for cars with internal combustion engines, official laboratory range and consumption figures often differ significantly from everyday reality. Actual electricity consumption is heavily dependent on outside temperatures, route profile, use of heating or air conditioning, and especially the dynamics of your right foot. To get a more accurate picture of the real-world figures you can expect from roughly four-year-old used cars on the market, we compared consumption based on real-world driving data.
The primary source of these real-world figures is the independent user platform Spritmonitor.de, supplemented by data and insights from long-term magazine tests. While the Audi e-tron GT from 2021–2024 (FW generation) shows an official paper consumption slightly above the 20 kWh/100 km mark, in the real world, it demands a bit more. The competing BMW i5 (G60/G61 generation), which appeared on the market in 2023 as a more modern alternative, can extract noticeably better efficiency from its more sophisticated electric drive architecture.
| Model and engine | Average consumption (kWh/100 km) |
|---|---|
| BMW i5 eDrive40 (250 kW) | 19.5 |
| BMW i5 xDrive40 (290 kW) | 20.8 |
| BMW i5 M60 (442 kW) | 22.5 |
| Audi e-tron GT (350 kW) | 23.5 |
| Audi RS e-tron GT (440 kW) | 25.0 |
Looking at the real-world figures, it is clearly evident that the newer and aerodynamically sleeker BMW i5 is overall more economical in practice. The base rear-wheel-drive version, the i5 eDrive40, can travel in real-world traffic below the 20 kWh/100 km threshold, which is an excellent result for a nearly five-meter-long executive sedan. Adding all-wheel drive (xDrive) or choosing the brutal M60 version logically increases consumption, yet it still stays within the bounds of solid efficiency. Conversely, the older, wider, and purely more sportily-styled Audi e-tron GT pays the price for its higher weight, giant tires, and body shaping that prioritizes downforce over perfect airflow. Even the base e-tron GT asks for roughly 23.5 kWh per 100 km on average, and with the top RS variant, consumption easily tips over 25 kWh/100 km. This is clear proof that with high-performance electric sports cars, the physics of weight and rolling resistance cannot be cheated.
For the average user and buyer on the used car market, this means only one thing. If you are a driver focused on long highway journeys and look at overall operating economy, the BMW i5 with the eDrive40 powertrain will offer you significantly lower charging bills and a longer real-world range. The Audi e-tron GT, on the other hand, targets buyers for whom design, a predatory sports chassis, and an emotive driving experience are much more important than the kilowatt-hours saved on the electricity bill.
Overall, while the price of energy consumed is usually not the most important decision factor for premium luxury cars, efficiency still plays a huge role. The difference in real-world consumption, which often reaches 4 to 5 kWh per 100 km in favor of the BMW i5, translates into one absolutely key thing – the frequency and duration of your stops at fast-charging stations. And it is precisely this time benefit that can be the final deciding factor for many busy drivers.
When choosing a premium electric vehicle on the used car market, the time since the model's launch and the associated depreciation curve play a crucial role. While the Audi e-tron GT (produced since 2021) fits perfectly into the category of 3 to 5-year-old used cars, the BMW i5 (G60 generation) only entered the market in the second half of 2023. Consequently, on the used market, you will almost exclusively find nearly new BMW i5 models aged 1 to 3 years.
The price range of both models reflects the significant drop in value typical for luxury electric vehicles in their first years of operation. This represents a huge financial advantage for second-hand buyers.
| Model | Generation / Years of Production | Base Version (from approx.) | Top Versions / RS / M (from approx.) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi e-tron GT | 2021–2023 | €49,000 | €58,000 |
| BMW i5 | G60 (2023–2024) | €45,000 | €70,000 |
Historical data from the premium vehicle market shows one of the most interesting phenomena of today – the steep drop in price for high-performance used electric vehicles.
While the Audi e-tron GT offers a steep price drop after three years, making premium RS versions accessible for a fraction of the original cost, the slightly newer BMW i5 represents a more modern, albeit slightly more expensive choice on the used market, which holds its value better in the first few years.
At the outset, it should be mentioned that in the premium electric vehicle segment, a five-star safety level according to the Euro NCAP methodology is the usual standard. When comparing used cars, however, it is crucial to put these results into context and take the year of testing into account. The testing protocols of the independent Euro NCAP organization are constantly evolving and becoming significantly stricter over the years. For this reason, percentage scores from different years cannot be directly compared. Newer tests include much more complex scenarios, such as stricter frontal impact simulations, more accurate detection of cyclists (including so-called "dooring", i.e., opening a door into a cyclist's path), and emergency braking at blind junctions.
Audi e-tron GT
Although the Audi e-tron GT is a highly sought-after sporty electric car on the market, the vehicle has not undergone official Euro NCAP crash tests to date. For this reason, there is no official percentage data for it that could be listed in the table. Nevertheless, the car's safety profile relies on the shared J1 technology platform with the Porsche Taycan (which earned its five-star rating in 2019). The e-tron GT's architecture is thus designed from the very beginning with massive protection for the large battery pack and extraordinary torsional stiffness. Furthermore, the car is equipped with advanced active systems as standard, such as adaptive cruise assist, lane keeping assist, and autonomous emergency braking reacting to pedestrians.
BMW i5
In contrast, the BMW i5 underwent rigorous Euro NCAP tests at the end of 2023 (as part of the evaluation of the current eighth generation of the 5 Series) and confidently earned the full five stars. The car was tested according to the latest and strictest protocols at the time, which actively verified the car's behavior in complex urban scenarios. The result is an excellent score of 89% in adult occupant protection and an above-standard high rating of 86% in the protection of vulnerable road users, which clearly demonstrates the high level of calibration of the assistance sensors and cameras.
| Parameter | Audi e-tron GT | BMW i5 |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | - | 2023 |
| Adult occupant protection | - | 89 % |
| Child occupant protection | - | 85 % |
| Vulnerable road user protection | - | 86 % |
| Safety assist systems | - | 78 % |
In conclusion, if verifiable certification is an absolute priority for you, the BMW i5 offers clearly the most modern and comprehensive safety package certified according to current, extremely strict standards. While the Audi e-tron GT lacks an official laboratory stamp, its robust platform shared with the VW Group's top models provides plenty of confidence even without a direct numerical rating.
While the Audi e-tron GT relies on robust engineering without official laboratory crash test results, the BMW i5 offers a proven and modern five-star safety shield from the end of 2023.
In addition to standard equipment, each of the models offers several unique features that can be decisive for the customer, and each approaches added value in its own way.
Stunning, low-slung sporty design with excellent aerodynamics
Top-tier driving dynamics and handling thanks to a very low center of gravity
Ultra-fast charging with up to 270 kW power thanks to advanced 800V architecture
Blistering acceleration and high performance even in base powertrains
Presence of a practical front trunk (frunk) for cables
Higher purchase price on the used market and steeper depreciation
Smaller and less accessible rear trunk (only 405 liters)
Limited headroom in the rear seats due to the sloping roofline
Infotainment and technological equipment feel slightly dated compared to the latest competitors
The Audi e-tron GT is the perfect choice for enthusiastic drivers looking for an emotional electric grand tourer with sporty DNA and lightning-fast charging. Its focus prioritizes style and driving experience over maximum family practicality, making it a fantastic and prestigious car for long journeys for those who don't mind compromises in spaciousness.
Extremely comfortable and perfectly soundproofed chassis, ideal for highway travel
Top-tier iDrive infotainment with a brilliant display and fast response times
Much more practical and spacious interior with excellent room for rear passengers
Availability in the more practical Touring (estate) body style
State-of-the-art assistance systems facilitating semi-autonomous driving
Uses a shared platform with internal combustion models; it is not a dedicated EV architecture
Absence of a front trunk (frunk)
Lower fast-charging speed (maximum 205 kW) due to the older 400V onboard network
Higher curb weight and massive dimensions impair agility on backroads
Exterior design may appear controversial
The BMW i5 is a fantastic executive sedan or estate that excels in daily usability, comfort, and technological sophistication. It represents a more rational and spacious choice, appealing to drivers who prefer maximum comfort, a large trunk, and a top-tier digital experience over pure sporty performance.
Based on long-term user experience, service reports, recalls, and findings from our detailed inspections, such as the comprehensive car audit, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems with both of these premium electric vehicles that buyers on the used car market should watch out for.
The Audi e-tron GT shares its technological platform (J1) with the Porsche Taycan, and although it is a mechanically precisely crafted car, it faces several specific defects associated with the first generation of this electrical architecture.
Although the e-tron GT excels in terms of driving characteristics and build quality, potential used car buyers should pay increased attention to the history of recalls and the functionality of the high-voltage heater before the approaching winter.
The i5 model (G60 generation) has been on the market for a shorter time than its competitor from Ingolstadt, so serious and expensive mechanical defects have appeared only rarely so far. Most service reports and owner feedback to date are limited to software "teething troubles" typical for the start of production.
The basic powertrain technology of the BMW i5 is proving to be exceptionally reliable, and the vast majority of recorded problems revolve only around minor software imperfections that the manufacturer is gradually correcting with remote updates.
When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key, which is why a physical car inspection by an independent mechanic is always the ideal step. Both premium electric vehicles have their own specifics and hide points that need to be focused on during a test drive.
The BMW i5 offers a slightly better overall range, especially in the eDrive40 version, which can handle up to 582 km according to the WLTP standard. The Audi e-tron GT reaches a maximum range of around 488 km, as its platform is more focused on sporty performance and dynamics than on maximum efficiency. In real-world daily use, however, both cars can easily handle longer trips with a range comfortably exceeding the 400 km mark.
The Bavarian representative is built as a classic executive sedan, making it more practical for everyday use and offering significantly more space for rear-seat passengers. The BMW i5's luggage compartment has a volume of 490 liters, while the model with the four rings has 405 liters in the rear and a smaller 85-liter storage space in the front. Due to its very low sporty silhouette, the e-tron GT also has more limited headroom for taller passengers.
Thanks to its more advanced 800V architecture, the Audi e-tron GT has a clear advantage over its competitor in energy replenishment speed. It can handle a maximum charging power of up to 270 kW, allowing a charge from 10 to 80% capacity in just 22 minutes. The i5 model uses a more standard 400V system with a maximum output of 205 kW, with the same charging cycle taking about 30 minutes on a fast charger.
The e-tron GT is built on a specialized platform shared with the Porsche Taycan, offering a much more agile driving experience, a lower center of gravity, and very precise steering. While the BMW i5 is extremely fast in a straight line in its top versions, its chassis primarily emphasizes smooth comfort and luxurious soundproofing typical of the 5 Series. For lovers of winding backroads and true GTs, the Audi is the better choice, while its competitor excels more as an exceptionally comfortable highway cruiser.
Both manufacturers' approaches to dashboard ergonomics and the digital environment are completely different. BMW uses its latest operating system with a large wide-angle curved display that integrates almost all functions, including climate control, into the touch interface. Audi, on the other hand, maintains a more traditional and sportier layout with physical buttons for temperature settings, which may suit many drivers slightly better in terms of attention while driving.
The choice between these two premium electric vehicles on the used car market ultimately boils down to a choice between pure sporting emotions and maximum everyday versatility. While the Audi e-tron GT appeals to enthusiastic drivers looking for an uncompromising grand tourer thanks to its advanced 800V architecture, aggressive design, and fantastic driving characteristics, it requires concessions from the occupants in terms of overall spaciousness and lacks the option of a tow bar. In contrast, the slightly newer BMW i5 represents the ideal choice for families and managers, to whom – especially in the practical estate version – it brings unrivaled travel comfort, top-tier digital technologies, and generous interior space. If dynamic style and a driving experience supported by the currently very attractive drop in used car prices are your absolute priority, go for the Audi; however, if you are looking for a rational, highly efficient, and versatile cruiser for everyday logistics, the BMW will suit you much better.
Sources: ADAC, idnes.cz, mdcr.cz, autohome.cz, auto-mania.cz, powerfan.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Detailed comparison of Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Porsche Taycan. A detailed look at real-world range, performance, and equipment. Read our verdict and choose your winner!
Apr 14, 2026

Audi e-tron GT vs. Porsche Taycan Comparison: Which luxury electric car should you choose? Find out everything about performance, real-world range, and read our final verdict.
Apr 14, 2026

Mercedes-Benz EQE vs Tesla Model S: A detailed comparison of range, technology, and comfort. Our final verdict will help you choose the best electric car.
Apr 13, 2026