
Lexus IS vs. Volvo V60: Complete comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Lexus IS vs Volvo V60. Discover the differences in driving characteristics, equipment, and reliability of used cars. Read our clear verdict before buying.
Apr 20, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Detailed comparison of Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Jaguar XE. Discover real-world experiences, differences in driving characteristics, and the verdict on which sedan to choose.
April 23, 2026


Alfa Romeo Giulia is a premium Italian sports sedan that attracts drivers on the used car market primarily with its unmistakable charisma and top-tier driving dynamics. Its challenger is the elegant British model Jaguar XE, which is also sold in an extended version under the designation Jaguar XEL in selected markets. The following comparison will show you in detail which of these two attractive, roughly four-year-old rear-wheel-drive cars represents a smarter choice in terms of driving experience, reliability, and everyday practicality.
In a direct comparison of the exterior dimensions of these two premium mid-size sedans, it is clear at first glance that the Jaguar XE takes up slightly more space on the road. With a total length of 4678 mm, it surpasses its Italian rival by approximately 30 to 40 millimeters, depending on the specific version. However, an even more significant difference can be found in the width, where the British beast dominates with a value of 1967 mm and gives a much broader impression than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, whose width ranges between 1860 and 1874 mm. For the Jaguar's occupants, this translates in practice to slightly more generous shoulder room and a more stable stance in corners. On the other hand, the wider body can be a slight disadvantage and require more attention when parking in narrow city garages or shopping centers.
The Alfa Romeo Giulia, on the other hand, relies on a slightly taller body construction, reaching 1433 to 1438 mm compared to the lower and more crouched Jaguar (1410 to 1425 mm). This height difference gives the Italian sedan a slight advantage in the form of somewhat easier entry and a more airy headroom. A key parameter for longitudinal cabin space is the wheelbase, which plays slightly in favor of the Jaguar with a value of 2835 mm compared to 2820 mm for the Alfa Romeo. However, the difference of just 15 millimeters is almost negligible in real-world use, and both cars offer a very similarly designed interior space typical of sportily-styled models, where the greatest emphasis is placed on the perfect driving position.
From the perspective of daily life, the Alfa Romeo Giulia represents a slightly more compact and agile choice for city traffic, where you will primarily benefit from its narrower profile. The Jaguar XE, by contrast, evokes cars from a class above with its proportions. Its wide track, extended wheelbase, and very low silhouette lend it an unmistakable elegance and a more aggressive athletic appearance, albeit at the cost of a compromise in the form of slightly reduced maneuverability in tight spaces.
| Parameter | Alfa Romeo Giulia Sedan | Jaguar XE Sedan |
|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 4639 - 4650 | 4678 |
| Width (mm) | 1860 - 1874 | 1967 |
| Height (mm) | 1433 - 1438 | 1410 - 1425 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2820 | 2835 |
When choosing a premium mid-size sedan, trunk capacity often plays the role of the proverbial tipping point. Although the Alfa Romeo Giulia (952 generation) and Jaguar XE (X760 generation) models, as roughly four-year-old used cars, primarily attract buyers with their refined driving experiences and unmistakable charm, family buyers or active managers must also consider their everyday practicality. While the differences in trunk capacity are not vast at first glance, the actual shape of the luggage compartment and the width of the loading sill can realistically determine how many travel bags or bulky sports equipment you can ultimately fit into the car.
Alfa Romeo Giulia offers a trunk capacity of 480 liters in its standard configuration, which is a fully competitive value in this segment. Jaguar XE lags slightly behind, with its trunk holding 410 to 455 liters in its basic configuration (depending on the presence of a spare wheel). It is important to mention that both of these current generations are available on the used car market exclusively with a classic sedan body style, meaning that more practical station wagon versions do not exist for them. For this reason, the manufacturers themselves do not state an official maximum volume after folding the rear seats (traditionally measured up to the roof) for these vehicles. A major advantage for transporting longer items, however, is the fact that both cars offer folding rear backrests split in a 40:20:40 ratio, which became a very welcome standard for the Jaguar after the 2019 facelift.
In practice, it is primarily the Italian representative that benefits from these figures. The Alfa Romeo Giulia provides space for several extra suitcases, and its total volume is perfectly sufficient for weekend shopping or a longer holiday with more people. The Jaguar XE, on the other hand, suffers from a slightly more irregular trunk shape, so despite a relatively decent listed volume, loading large rigid luggage can be more difficult. A positive note for used car buyers is the fact that neither model sees a significant reduction in capacity across different drivetrain versions. High-performance sports variants and mild-hybrid diesel engines in the Jaguar maintain almost identical trunk volumes, so practicality does not suffer even when choosing an alternative powertrain.
| Parameter | Alfa Romeo Giulia Sedan | Jaguar XE Sedan |
|---|---|---|
| Basic volume (liters) | 480 | 410 - 455 |
| Max. volume after folding seats (liters) | Not specified | Not specified |
Although neither car offers a station wagon body variant, the Alfa Romeo Giulia, thanks to its larger and better-shaped 480-liter trunk, provides more utility for everyday life than the slightly more cramped Jaguar XE.
A car's ability to tow a trailer plays a very important role when choosing a practical premium sedan. Whether you are planning active weekends, transporting oversized sports equipment, or a summer road trip with a larger caravan, the technical specifications clearly show which of these two rivals offers greater versatility. Looking closer at approximately four-year-old used cars on today's market, you get a much stronger partner with a British pedigree in this discipline.
For typical used vehicles of the X760 generation, the Jaguar XE (for example, in the popular D200, P250, or P300 engine versions) offers a very solid maximum braked trailer weight of 1 800 kg. An unbraked trailer can then weigh the standard 750 kg. The Alfa Romeo Giulia from the 952 generation, on the other hand, with the usual 2.0 Turbo and 2.2 Diesel engines, must settle for a lower limit. Its maximum for a braked trailer stops at 1 600 kg and an unbraked trailer is limited to 745 kg. In practice, this means that although the Giulia is perfectly sufficient for weekend shopping and longer holidays with a smaller load and, thanks to a bike rack on the tow bar, can easily provide space for several extra suitcases, the Jaguar XE can handle the transport of a heavier boat or a full-sized family caravan without any problems.
When buying a used car from either camp, you will also come across interesting engine exceptions that change the overall towing capacity. If you were considering the older, maximally eco-tuned British version, the Jaguar XE E-Performance, you would encounter a reduced braked trailer capacity of 1 600 kg. However, you will find much more drastic restrictions with the Italian competitor. While standard versions of the Alfa Romeo can accommodate a tow bar without problems, for the fascinating top sports models Giulia Quadrifoglio or the collector's rarities GTA and GTAm, towing a trailer is completely prohibited, and these cars have no factory homologation for it.
Overall, the British cat wins in the towing power rating. Although neither of these driver-focused sedans is primarily created as a workhorse, the Jaguar XE maintains a much more versatile and practical face in standard configurations, with a significantly larger performance reserve for heavier trailers.
| Model and engine | Braked trailer (kg) | Unbraked trailer (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Jaguar XE (D200, P250, P300) | 1800 | 750 |
| Jaguar XE E-Performance | 1600 | 750 |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia 2.0 Turbo / 2.2 Diesel | 1600 | 745 |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia Quadrifoglio / GTA / GTAm | 0 | 0 |
When it comes to choosing an engine, the Alfa Romeo Giulia and Jaguar XE offer different approaches that fundamentally influence the overall driving experience and fuel consumption. While both cars rely on rear-wheel drive as standard and excellent eight-speed automatic transmissions, their philosophies differ. On the four-year-old used car market, the Alfa Romeo Giulia profiles itself as the choice for purists and sports-oriented drivers for whom dynamics and the spirited performance of petrol and diesel four-cylinders are key. In contrast, the post-facelift Jaguar XE simplified its range and focused on refinement and efficiency, which is enhanced in the diesels by mild-hybrid (MHEV) technology. For used car buyers, this means a clear choice between the purely mechanical, emotive approach of the Italians and the technologically advanced, smooth operation of the British aristocrat.
The range of used Alfa Romeo Giulia cars (mostly after the 2020 and 2021 updates) is strongly focused on driving pleasure. The basis of the petrol range is the excellent 2.0 Turbo 16V engine, available in a standard version with 147 kW and in the highly sought-after sportier Veloce variant with 206 kW. The 2.2 Diesel units are a frequent choice for long motorway journeys; on the market, you will mainly encounter versions with 118 kW, 140 kW, and the top-tier 154 kW (again for Veloce models), which impress with massive torque. A true gem and a collector's dream is the Quadrifoglio version with a 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo engine, whose 375 kW output surpasses anything the rival British sedan can currently offer. Most common variants can be found with both rear-wheel drive and the 4x4 system known as Q4.
| Engine Type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.0 Turbo 16V | Petrol | 147 / 206 | 330 / 400 | 8AT |
| 2.2 Diesel | Diesel | 118 / 140 / 154 | 450 / 450 / 470 | 8AT |
| 2.9 V6 Bi-Turbo | Petrol | 375 | 600 | 8AT |
In the case of the Jaguar XE among approximately four-year-old used cars, you will encounter a significantly streamlined range made up of the brand's own Ingenium engines. Models from the turn of 2020 and 2021 definitively abandoned the older D180 diesel version and replaced it with the updated D200 unit with 150 kW. This four-cylinder diesel uses a mild-hybrid system (MHEV) as standard, which helps smooth out responses when pulling away, improves the start-stop function, and effectively reduces real-world fuel consumption. For petrol lovers, the brisk P250 (184 kW) and more powerful P300 (221 kW) engines are available. While the P250 model exclusively drives the rear axle, the more powerful P300 version was linked solely to all-wheel drive (AWD) in newer models. Unfortunately, the older large-displacement six-cylinders from the start of XE production are no longer found in this age category of young used cars.
| Engine Type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P250 (2.0 i4) | Petrol | 184 | 365 | 8AT |
| P300 (2.0 i4) | Petrol | 221 | 400 | 8AT |
| D200 (2.0 MHEV) | Diesel | 150 | 430 | 8AT |
Both manufacturers appeal to very different audiences. If driving is a passion for you and you demand an immediate, sharp response with a playful chassis, the Giulia (especially with the 2.0 Turbo 16V petrol engine in the Veloce version) will be an absolutely fantastic choice for you. Its only weak point may be the rawer and, in older models, slightly noisier character of the diesel units. However, if you are looking for a British motorway cruiser for long journeys, you will appreciate the quiet power and refinement of the Jaguar XE. The D200 diesel engine with its mild-hybrid technology is exceptionally refined and economical, making it the perfect tool for managers and drivers who prefer maximum comfort and efficiency.
The Alfa Romeo impresses enthusiastic drivers with sharp dynamics and genuine emotion, while the Jaguar XE appeals to motorway travelers with its top-tier refinement and efficient mild-hybrid.
Choosing the right engine is crucial for long-term satisfaction with these sporty premium sedans. Both manufacturers rely primarily on advanced turbocharged four-cylinders for their used cars approaching four years of age (around the 2022 model year). Interestingly, the manufacturers have taken different approaches to their powertrain portfolios throughout the car's life cycle. While Alfa Romeo has maintained a stable and refined range for its 952 generation, with its excellent 2.0-litre petrol engine remaining essentially unchanged throughout production, Jaguar radically reduced its range for the XE (X760 generation). Our recommendations are based on real-world experience, the balance between performance and fuel consumption, user-friendliness, and proven mechanical reliability in practice.
| Model | Recommended engine | Configuration | Power | Availability history (per DB) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo Giulia (952) | 2.0 Turbo 16V (Veloce) | 2.0 I4 | 147 – 206 kW | 2016 – present |
| Jaguar XE (X760) | 2.0 P250 | 2.0 I4 | 184 kW | 2019 – 2024 |
Market availability note: The characterful six-cylinder has completely disappeared from Jaguar's original wide range (discontinued in 2019), and for the roughly four-year-old used cars we are considering, the British manufacturer limited itself exclusively to 2.0-litre Ingenium four-cylinders. If you come across a used car labeled XE 35t, it is always an older model year that requires specific service attention. Therefore, we focus below on the best modern and available choices.
The experience of many drivers confirms that the official fuel consumption figures provided by manufacturers often differ significantly from real-world usage in everyday traffic. Especially with premium sports sedans featuring precise steering and an engaging chassis, which directly encourage more dynamic driving, it is good to know the actual figures in advance. For the most accurate comparison on the four-year-old used car market, we have therefore used data from the independent community portal Spritmonitor.de. Here, thousands of motorists record every refueling over the long term, giving us a very realistic picture of the appetite of the most popular engine versions for the 2020 to 2023 generations.
| Model and engine | Average consumption (l/100 km) |
|---|---|
| Alfa Romeo Giulia 2.2 Diesel | 6.1 |
| Jaguar XE D200 | 6.2 |
| Alfa Romeo Giulia 2.0 Turbo 16V | 8.4 |
| Jaguar XE P250 | 8.6 |
Looking at the real-world data, it is clear that the diesel engines in both cars maintain excellent efficiency and compete very closely. The diesel units (2.2 Diesel in the Alfa and D200 in the Jaguar) manage to drive in the real world with an average just slightly above the six-litre mark, which is an excellent result for dynamic mid-size sedans. On the other hand, it may come as a surprise that modern turbocharged petrol engines do not save as much fuel in practice. Although they have relatively reasonable figures on paper, as soon as you drive the two-litre petrol (2.0 Turbo 16V or P250) more briskly, or move in heavy city traffic, the average consumption very quickly and confidently climbs towards the eight and a half litres per hundred kilometres mark.
What does this mean for the average user?
Overall, it appears that fuel consumption is unlikely to be the main and only deciding factor in the battle between the Alfa Romeo Giulia and the Jaguar XE. Both manufacturers offer almost identical real-world figures in comparable engine versions, with differences in the order of tenths. Design, interior space, the reliability of a specific unit on the used car market, and above all, the subtle nuances in the overall driving characteristics of both cars will therefore carry more weight in the selection process.
Both models represent a very tempting alternative to traditional German premium sedans. For buyers of used cars roughly four years old (2021–2022 models), this means one thing – thanks to a slightly faster depreciation in the first few years, these sporty-styled cars can be purchased for excellent value. The Jaguar XE usually holds its value slightly worse than the Alfa Romeo Giulia, making it the more affordable choice. Conversely, the Giulia, thanks to its very strong fan base and driving enthusiasts, holds its value more stably after the initial drop.
The four-year-old Giulia represents models after the important facelift (model year 2020 and newer), which brought significantly higher quality materials to the interior and much better infotainment. This makes it a highly sought-after car on the used market.
The British beast underwent a major update in 2019. Four-year-old used cars thus already feature new technologies and beautifully crafted interiors. However, due to lower awareness on the used market, the XE depreciates significantly faster than its Italian or German rivals.
| Category | Alfa Romeo Giulia (2021–2022) | Jaguar XE (2021–2022) |
|---|---|---|
| Base engine (diesel) | €25,000 – €29,000 | €21,000 – €25,000 |
| Higher trims and entry-level petrol | €29,000 – €33,000 | €25,000 – €31,000 |
| Top-tier standard models (AWD, >250 hp) | €31,000 – €39,000 | €29,000 – €35,000 |
While the Jaguar XE represents a hidden gem on the used market with an unbeatable price-to-luxury ratio, the Alfa Romeo Giulia holds its value significantly better thanks to more desirable sport versions and a loyal community.
Both compared cars, the Alfa Romeo Giulia and the Jaguar XE, earned the maximum five-star rating in their original Euro NCAP tests. When choosing a used car approximately four years old, however, it is crucial to consider the context and the year of this measurement. Euro NCAP safety protocols are constantly evolving and becoming stricter – with increasing emphasis on modern scenarios such as advanced cyclist detection or avoiding head-on collisions at intersections. For this reason, percentage scores from 2015 and 2016 cannot be directly compared with current tests. For both models, the official certification has logically expired due to the age of the original crash tests. Nevertheless, structurally, these are exceptionally rigid and safe premium sedans.
The Alfa Romeo Giulia underwent rigorous crash tests in 2016. Its result in adult occupant protection reached a phenomenal 98% at the time, which was an absolute record result back then. This proves that the basic body structure and the use of lightweight but ultra-strong materials represent the absolute top tier in the Italian car. According to the methodology of the time, the car's weaker points were the protection of vulnerable road users (69%) and, above all, the rating of assistance systems (60%). However, it must be remembered that for used cars around four years old (after the first improvements), the level of active assistants is already significantly better than what this original homologation test could reflect.
The British Jaguar XE underwent Euro NCAP tests a year earlier, in 2015. Its percentage scores across all measured categories were noticeably more balanced. In adult passenger protection, the sedan achieved a confident 92%, and it handled child occupant protection at 82%. Jaguar recorded its biggest lead over its Italian competitor in the areas of pedestrian protection (81%) and the rating of assistance systems (82%). These very good figures were contributed to by the exemplary standard equipment at the time, which included a pop-up active hood and very well-tuned autonomous emergency braking.
From the perspective of raw passive safety and impact energy absorption, the Alfa Romeo Giulia is an absolute phenomenon, and its body would stand up to occupant protection with a margin even in today's traffic. However, if you are looking for a car that, according to available tests, offers a more balanced overall safety package – including more advanced protection for vulnerable participants and a strong emphasis on electronic assistants in the standard equipment – the Jaguar XE provides a slightly more comprehensive and modern approach to protection. From a practical safety standpoint, however, there is nothing to fault in the used models of both brands.
| Parameter | Alfa Romeo Giulia | Jaguar XE |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | 2016 | 2015 |
| Adult occupant protection | 98 % | 92 % |
| Child protection | 81 % | 82 % |
| Vulnerable road user protection | 69 % | 81 % |
| Safety assistance systems | 60 % | 82 % |
Both cars guarantee an exceptionally rigid body and first-class adult protection, but in terms of official data on assistance systems and pedestrian protection, the Jaguar XE is slightly better.
In addition to standard equipment, each of the models offers several unique features and innovations that go far beyond the basics, approaching added value in their own distinct way.
Top-tier driving characteristics with excellent weight balance and sharp steering
Attractive and timeless Italian design that doesn't age even after years
Very lightweight construction thanks to the use of aluminum and a carbon fiber driveshaft
Refined and powerful gasoline engines (especially the 2.0 Turbo version)
Significantly improved and faster infotainment in models after the 2020 facelift
Rear seat space is rather below average for adult passengers
The quality of some interior plastics does not reach the level of German premium competitors
More limited network of authorized and specialized service centers
Concerns about long-term reliability are reflected in a higher depreciation of used car values
The Alfa Romeo Giulia is clearly built for enthusiastic drivers looking for maximum driving pleasure and desiring a car that stands out from the crowd. A superbly tuned chassis and emotive character make it the perfect choice for those willing to sacrifice a bit of everyday practicality in exchange for a pure driving experience.
A perfect compromise between sporty agility and very high driving comfort
A significant leap in build quality and interior materials (after the 2019 facelift)
Top-tier and clear Pivi Pro multimedia system in newer used cars
Excellent cabin soundproofing even at highway speeds
High exclusivity on the used car market – a car you won't see on every corner
Very cramped legroom and headroom in the second row of seats
Below-average trunk space (410 liters) with a narrow loading opening
Higher curb weight compared to the Giulia slightly limits agility in tight corners
Risk of higher service costs, especially with older Ingenium diesel engines
The Jaguar XE is an ideal choice for individualists who require a cozy premium cabin, British elegance, and comfortable highway cruising. It makes the least sense as a family car, but it serves perfectly for couples or individuals who prefer sophisticated travel comfort and a sense of exclusivity.
Based on long-term user experience, service reports, and our data from comprehensive car inspections, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems that buyers of these used sedans should watch out for.
Alfa Romeo Giulia brought excellent driving characteristics to the segment, but requires attention regarding electronics and strict adherence to service intervals.
The mechanical basis of the Giulia is surprisingly robust, however, the car occasionally suffers from electronic whims and requires a careful owner who does not neglect maintenance. A simple weak car battery can cause a number of warning lights on the dashboard to light up for no reason.
Jaguar XE attracts with British elegance and premium materials, but for used cars, it is absolutely crucial to carefully check especially the condition of diesel engines and onboard systems.
While the Jaguar XE's chassis is excellently tuned, the widely used Ingenium diesel engines require extreme caution when purchasing due to the risk of fatal timing chain failure. A careful check of the service history and documented timely oil changes are an absolute necessity here.
When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is crucial, and especially with premium sports sedans, it doesn't pay to underestimate anything. Detecting neglected service with an untrained eye is usually difficult, which is why a thorough physical car inspection is the best prevention against expensive problems. Here are some specific points to focus on for these two models:
The Alfa Romeo Giulia offers a slightly larger luggage compartment with a reported volume of 480 liters. The Jaguar XE lags slightly behind in this regard, as its trunk holds 410 liters, or a maximum of 455 liters in older versions without a spare wheel. However, with both premium sedans, it is necessary to account for a narrower loading opening, which limits the transport of larger items.
Both cars represent the absolute top of their class in terms of handling, with the Alfa Romeo Giulia excelling with very sharp steering and lower weight for a maximally sharp sporting experience. The Jaguar XE, on the other hand, boasts a fantastically balanced chassis that dampens bumps excellently and offers an ideal compromise between dynamics and comfort. Overall, the Giulia is more playful and aggressive on back roads, while the Jaguar feels more mature and smooth.
Newer models from around 2020 and younger (i.e., roughly four-year-old cars) show significant improvements in the reliability of both electronics and powertrains compared to the early production years for both brands. For the Giulia, it is advisable to thoroughly check the condition of chassis components and updates to the onboard systems, while for the Jaguar XE, watch out for the condition of the diesel particulate filter (DPF) on diesel versions driven in the city. In both cases, the key to reliable operation is a verifiable and regular service history.
After its facelift, the Jaguar XE features the top-tier Pivi Pro infotainment, which is fast, modern, and gives the interior a very luxurious and technologically advanced British character. While the Alfa Romeo Giulia offers a perfect driving position and beautiful sporty dashboard architecture, its displays and multimedia system lag slightly behind the competition. If you are looking for premium materials and state-of-the-art connectivity, the Jaguar will win you over, while the Alfa will please automotive purists more.
For longer highway trips, the diesel units in both cars (2.2 JTDM in the Alfa and the two-liter Ingenium diesel in the Jaguar) are an excellent choice thanks to their high efficiency and refinement. However, if you mostly drive shorter distances and in the city, avoid the risk of clogged DPF filters and choose the two-liter gasoline engines. Furthermore, these gasoline units correspond much better with the sporty DNA of both brands and bring greater driving pleasure.
While the Alfa Romeo Giulia and Jaguar XE share the concept of a premium sports sedan, each appeals to a completely different group of drivers in the market for roughly four-year-old used cars. The Italian Giulia is a pure driver's tool that wins you over with phenomenal agility, exceptionally sharp steering, and an emotive character, making it the ideal choice for automotive purists willing to sacrifice a bit of comfort for the ultimate driving experience. In contrast, the British Jaguar represents a superbly soundproofed highway cruiser that attracts with a more luxurious interior finish, more advanced on-board technology, and an overall more attractive price-to-equipment ratio. Your final decision will therefore depend primarily on personal priorities: for genuine sporting passion and agility on backroads, clearly choose the Alfa Romeo, while for everyday representative travel with a high dose of elegance and comfort, the Jaguar XE makes more sense.
Sources: ADAC, forbes.cz, garaz.cz, autosalon.tv, chytreauto.cz, motoristickydenik.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Detailed comparison of Lexus IS vs Volvo V60. Discover the differences in driving characteristics, equipment, and reliability of used cars. Read our clear verdict before buying.
Apr 20, 2026

Detailed comparison of the Jaguar XE and Volvo V60. We compared the driving characteristics, engines, and interior space of these used cars. Read our verdict and make the right choice!
Apr 18, 2026

Ford Mondeo vs. Volkswagen Passat: Detailed comparison, reviews, engines, and verdict. Find out which of these popular cars is the better choice for you.
Apr 13, 2026