Nissan Ariya vs. Škoda Enyaq iV: Complete comparison 2026

Nissan Ariya is an innovative Japanese electric crossover that brings a bold futuristic design and a highly comfortable, minimalist interior full of modern technology to the market. Its challenger today is the Škoda Enyaq iV, referred to simply as the Enyaq in newer model years, which represents an exceptionally popular, spacious, and practically-oriented family SUV from the Mladá Boleslav production. In the following comparison, we will focus in detail on the specifications, driving characteristics, and overall utility value of both cars to find out which of these different approaches to electromobility makes the most sense on the used car market and will be the best choice for you.

In a direct comparison of the exterior dimensions of these two popular electric models, you will soon find that the Škoda Enyaq iV takes up slightly more space on the road. The Czech representative, with its length of 4,649 to 4,653 mm (depending on the classic body or the Coupé version), is 54 to 58 mm longer than the Nissan Ariya, which measures 4,595 mm in length. Enyaq also has the advantage of a wider build – with a value of 1,879 mm, it surpasses its Japanese competitor by 29 mm. In practice, this means that the Škoda gives a slightly more massive impression from the outside and offers a slightly more generous interior width for passengers. On the other hand, the shorter and narrower body gives Nissan a slight advantage in daily parking and maneuvering in cramped city streets.

However, an interesting paradox arises when looking at the wheelbase and the height of the vehicles. Although the Nissan Ariya is a shorter car overall, it boasts a 10 mm longer wheelbase (2,775 mm compared to 2,765 mm for the Enyaq). Nissan's engineers thus managed to push the wheels further into the very corners of the body. The result is the maximization of longitudinal space for passengers inside the cabin, thanks to which the Ariya bravely compensates for its shorter exterior length. Furthermore, at 1,650 mm, the Japanese model is about 30 mm taller than the Enyaq, giving it a more classic upright SUV stance with a pleasantly higher driving position.

From the perspective of overall exterior dimensions, the choice between these two cars depends primarily on your driving territory. The Škoda Enyaq iV benefits from its longer and wider build, which you will appreciate if you are looking for a robust family cruiser with maximum internal volume for long journeys. The Nissan Ariya, on the other hand, excels in clever space packaging – combining a long wheelbase and a higher roof into a more compact exterior package. As a result, it maintains great passenger comfort while remaining a more agile and friendly companion for city traffic.

When choosing a used family electric car after about four years of operation, luggage space volume is usually one of the most important criteria. This is often where the line is drawn between models that focus more on flashy style and design and those that prioritize maximum daily utility. While both compared vehicles offer above-average space for the crew, the rear part of the body reveals completely different philosophies of their manufacturers, which is good to keep in mind especially when packing for family trips.

Škoda Enyaq iV does not deny its group roots and the brand's traditional reputation for unrivaled space and practicality. In the standard SUV body, it has a generous basic volume of 585 liters. This space is more than sufficient for a large weekend shop, a folded stroller, and bulky luggage for a longer family holiday without the need for difficult compromises. If you opt for the more dynamically styled Enyaq Coupé for aesthetic reasons, you only lose a negligible 15 liters, so the basic volume here is a very solid 570 liters. After folding the rear seats, the traditional SUV transforms into a practical workhorse with a maximum volume of up to 1710 liters, while the elegant Coupé still offers a respectable 1610 liters.

Nissan Ariya, on the other hand, approaches the interior layout with an emphasis on the living-room-like airiness of the passenger cabin, which takes its toll on the luggage compartment. The front-wheel-drive version offers a trunk with a basic volume of 468 liters, which is a rather average value in this class. The situation is even tighter for the e-4ORCE all-wheel-drive variants, where the second electric motor located on the rear axle takes up more space under the trunk floor and reduces the basic capacity to 415 liters. Although the Enyaq iV clearly dominates in the basic layout and offers space for several extra suitcases, the differences narrow after folding the rear backrests – the Ariya can reach a relatively solid maximum volume of 1691 liters, largely making up for its initial loss when moving larger items.

The ability to tow a trailer is often limited in electric vehicles, yet the Nissan Ariya and Škoda Enyaq iV offer relatively solid values in this regard, significantly expanding their practicality. The presence of a towing hitch means valuable space for a few extra suitcases in a light trailer, which is a transport capacity perfectly sufficient for weekend shopping or longer holidays. When choosing a used car around four years old (model years 2021 to 2023), however, it is necessary to carefully monitor specific powertrain versions, as both models differ significantly in their capabilities.

Standard and Maximum Trailer Weight

In a direct comparison, it is clear that Škoda bets on a more universal standard, while Nissan offers the highest values only for specific versions:

• Škoda Enyaq iV (2021–2023): Standard rear-wheel drive versions (iV 60 and iV 80) allow towing a braked trailer weighing a solid 1,000 kg. If you choose an all-wheel drive variant (iV 80x or the sporty RS), the maximum braked trailer weight increases to 1,200 kg.
• Nissan Ariya (2022–2023): For the basic version with a 63 kWh battery, the braked trailer limit is restricted to only 750 kg, which is the same value as for an unbraked trailer. Most versions with the larger 87 kWh battery paired with front-wheel drive have the same limit. The turning point comes only with the top-of-the-line 87 kWh all-wheel drive variant, which can tow an unrivaled 1,500 kg.

Final Evaluation

If you plan on frequently towing a heavier caravan or boat, the top-tier Nissan Ariya with all-wheel drive and a 1,500 kg capacity is clearly the best choice of the pair. For more common daily use and trouble-free towing of light trailers, however, the Škoda Enyaq iV offers a much better and more stable base (1,000 kg compared to 750 kg for the Nissan), meaning you don't necessarily have to hunt for the most expensive and powerful specifications among used cars.

When comparing the powertrains of the Nissan Ariya and Škoda Enyaq iV models, we are moving exclusively in the world of battery electric vehicles (BEV). Both vehicles rely on pure electric drive, which guarantees smooth, quiet, and locally emission-free travel with almost instantaneous torque delivery. However, a fundamental technical difference between these competitors lies in the motor layout concept. In its standard single-motor models, the Nissan Ariya relies on front-wheel drive (FWD), which may feel more familiar to some drivers transitioning from previous internal combustion engine cars. In contrast, the Škoda Enyaq iV utilizes the Volkswagen Group's MEB platform, where rear-wheel drive (RWD) is the default standard. This arrangement gives the Czech representative the advantage of better traction during acceleration and an excellent turning radius. Naturally, powerful dual-motor all-wheel drive (AWD) versions exist for both models. For roughly four-year-old used cars, buyers typically choose between efficient single-motor variants for the longest possible range and more powerful AWD versions aimed at demanding drivers who require uncompromising dynamics and confidence in winter conditions.

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya entered the market in the autumn of 2022 and offers two usable battery capacities (63 kWh and 87 kWh). The lower-powered front-wheel-drive version has an output of 160 kW, while the model with the larger battery generates a solid 178 kW. However, those looking for maximum confidence and dynamics should focus on the all-wheel drive labeled as e-4ORCE. The basic AWD with the 87kWh battery offers 225 kW of power and a massive 600 Nm of torque. According to data tables, an even more extreme Evolve+ specification with 290 kW was available for a limited time between 2023 and 2024 (until autumn), but it was withdrawn from the portfolio and is a complete rarity on the used car market. Although a sporty Nismo edition was introduced in early 2025, it cannot be expected among four-year-old used cars for obvious reasons.

Škoda Enyaq iV

The history of Škoda Enyaq powertrains is much more diverse regarding the used car market. Between 2021 and 2023, models designated as iV dominated the range. On the secondary market, you will most often encounter the iV 60 (132 kW) versions and the variant focused on the longest possible range, the iV 80 (150 kW). These rear-wheel-drive powertrains were complemented by the dual-motor iV 80x (195 kW) and the sporty iV RS (220 kW) models. An important fact, however, is that by the end of 2023, production of practically all original "iV" units was discontinued. They were replaced by more modern 85, 85x, and improved RS variants, which use a significantly more efficient electric motor on the rear axle. The power of the 85 model thus jumped to 210 kW and the RS version to 250 kW. Therefore, if you are choosing a car around four years old, your selection will largely consist of the original reliable iV generation with slightly lower power.

Choosing the right powertrain and battery capacity is crucial for long-term satisfaction with an electric vehicle. Our recommendations are based on real-world range, energy efficiency, user experience, and the reliability of roughly four-year-old used cars on the market. While the Nissan Ariya utilizes the advanced CMF-EV platform with unique battery thermal management and offers the optional e-4ORCE all-wheel drive (developed with expertise from the GT-R sports model), the Škoda Enyaq iV stands on the mass-produced MEB platform, which relies on rear-wheel drive for standard versions—an interesting return to historical roots for the Mladá Boleslav-based brand. Both manufacturers offer a wide range of versions, but practice shows that the chase for extreme performance or, conversely, excessive skimping on battery capacity does not make sense in daily operation from a long-term perspective.

For the Nissan Ariya, we recommend: 87 kWh (FWD), 178 kW (242 hp)

This version with the larger battery and front-wheel drive (primarily available in 2022 and 2023 before the automaker switched to new equipment package divisions) represents the absolute best choice, combining worry-free range with rational efficiency. Compared to the base 63 kWh version, it offers much more freedom on the road with a real combined range safely exceeding 400 kilometers. The 178 kW output provides excellent dynamics with immediate torque delivery, while the absence of a second electric motor (found in the powerful e-4ORCE version) means significantly lower weight and overall more economical operation without unnecessary battery drain. Mechanically, the car is very reliable; however, when inspecting a used unit, thoroughly check the condition of the chassis and front axle arms. A test drive and listening for noises on uneven surfaces will reveal any potential play – the front wheels must handle not only the weight of the battery-laden SUV but also the constant onslaught of high torque, which can accelerate wear on ball joints and bushings. This specification is the embodiment of comfort, ideal for families and drivers traveling longer distances who appreciate an exceptionally quiet cabin and smooth travel without range anxiety.

For the Škoda Enyaq iV, we recommend: iV 80 (77 kWh), 150 kW (204 hp)

In the case of the Czech automaker, the most rational and market-proven model is the iV 80 version. This specification was offered within the first generation only from 2021 until the end of 2023 (subsequently replaced by the updated 85 variant), making it the most price-attractive model with a large battery on the three-to-four-year-old used car market today. Thanks to its 77 kWh usable capacity, it offers a great balance between purchase price, range, and solid mechanical durability. The 150 kW electric motor driving exclusively the rear wheels gives the car very pleasant agility, and average consumption can easily be maintained between 17 and 19 kWh per 100 km. While the iV 80x all-wheel drive has better traction, it comes at the cost of higher consumption, whereas the weaker iV 60 version is limited on highways by the need for more frequent charging. A weak point of the early model years was unrefined software – therefore, when buying, check the functionality of the infotainment and ensure the car has at least software version ME3 installed by a service center; otherwise, you risk screen freezes and assistant system failures. From a mechanical standpoint, pay close attention to even wear of the rear tires. The rear axle carries the massive weight of the battery while also transmitting all the power, so an aggressive driving style by the previous owner will quickly manifest as unevenly worn tread on the edges, indicating a need for wheel alignment. The iV 80 model is a perfect all-rounder for calmer drivers looking for maximum space, travel comfort, and reliability at reasonable operating costs.

Official consumption values provided by manufacturers according to the WLTP methodology are often more optimistic than reality. This is especially true for electric vehicles, where range and real energy consumption are significantly influenced by highway speed, outside temperature, and overall driving style. For an objective comparison, it is therefore always best to look at data directly from owners in real-world operation. Community portals such as the German Spritmonitor.de, where drivers record their charging over the long term, are an ideal source. Here we quickly find that for roughly four-year-old used cars of both models, real consumption can easily differ from the official figures by 10 to 20 percent, as physics and higher aerodynamic drag in the real world cannot be cheated.

When interpreting these trends, we can notice several interesting phenomena. Surprisingly, the Škoda Enyaq iV benefits greatly from excellent aerodynamics and efficient thermal management. It is evident from the table that a more powerful and heavier battery version (Enyaq iV 80 compared to iV 60) does not automatically mean a drastic increase in consumption – on the contrary, it stays at very favorable values around 16.5 kWh. Logically, a larger toll is only taken by the added second electric motor in the 80x version (all-wheel drive). In contrast, the Nissan Ariya is noticeably "hungrier" overall. Its robust body and different powertrain setup mean that even the base version with the smaller 63 kWh battery consumes more energy than the powerful all-wheel drive from Škoda. For the Ariya model with the large 87 kWh battery, real consumption then dangerously approaches the limit of 20 kWh per 100 km.

For the average user and those interested in a roughly four-year-old used car, this means a clear choice based on the type of use. If you are looking for a vehicle primarily for shorter commutes from suburban areas and for routine city traffic, the difference in consumption will be partially erased thanks to frequent recuperation, and both cars will operate efficiently enough. However, if you spend a lot of time on the highway or regularly drive long distances, the Japanese model will require slightly more frequent charging stops and overall operating costs will be higher. For budget-conscious buyers of older models, the representative from Mladá Boleslav is the clear favorite in terms of absolute efficiency.

In conclusion, it can be said that electricity consumption in this comparison definitely represents a very significant factor. Especially with used electric vehicles, where every kilowatt saved helps maximize real range, these values play clearly in favor of the Škoda Enyaq iV. The more efficient operation of the rear-wheel drive iV 80 makes it a rational choice, and consumption is a very compelling argument here for leaning towards the Czech brand when purchasing.

When choosing a roughly four-year-old electric SUV, we look at the 2021 and 2022 model years. While the Škoda Enyaq iV was already heavily filling company fleets and private garages at this time, the Nissan Ariya was only just entering the market. This historical context and the different sales strategies of the two manufacturers are fundamentally reflected in the current situation on the used car market.

Škoda Enyaq iV (2021–2022)

The Czech market is literally a promised land for a used Enyaq. Thanks to massive earlier sales, buyers have a huge selection in used car dealerships, which creates downward pressure on prices.

• Affordable entry: The cheapest units with a smaller battery (iV 60 version with 62 kWh capacity) and higher mileage can be purchased today starting from €19,000 to €21,000.
• The golden middle way: The most sought-after iV 80 version (82 kWh), which offers the ideal compromise between price and range, most often ranges between €25,000 and €31,000.
• Premium versions: All-wheel drive models (80x), Sportline trim, or even RS versions hold their value significantly better and start above €35,000.

Nissan Ariya (2022)

The Japanese challenger is a rarity on the used car market compared to the Enyaq. A more limited supply and richer standard equipment mean that the Ariya maintains more confident price tags and the depreciation is not as steep.

• Higher starting line: Entry-level models with a 63 kWh battery appear in advertisements with price tags starting around €33,000.
• Long-range models: Versions with a larger battery (87 kWh) or popular specifications with the advanced e-4ORCE all-wheel drive commonly range between €39,000 and €45,000.
• Limited choice: Buyers must expect that finding a specific color or equipment may take longer, or it may be necessary to look at foreign markets.

Quick Comparison of Used Car Prices

From the perspective of residual value and purchase value, the Škoda Enyaq iV is the clear favorite. Four-year-old cars have lost a significant portion of their original purchase price and represent a great price-to-value ratio. The Nissan Ariya makes sense for drivers who require exclusivity, a fresh look, and don't mind a higher initial investment on the secondary market.

When choosing a family electric car from the used car market, safety is one of the most important criteria. Both the Nissan Ariya and the Škoda Enyaq iV boast a maximum five-star rating in tests by the independent organization Euro NCAP. However, it is extremely important to view these results in the context of when the vehicles were tested. The Euro NCAP methodology is constantly evolving and becoming stricter. Testing protocols from different years place different emphasis on active safety features and new types of assistants, making percentage scores from different years not entirely directly comparable.

Nissan Ariya: Top performer in active safety

The Nissan Ariya underwent testing in 2022, during the validity of very strict protocols. These paid great attention to new frontal crash simulations, cyclist detection, and intersection crossing scenarios. The car achieved an excellent result, particularly in the safety assist category (93%), where the advanced ProPILOT Assist system was fully demonstrated. Furthermore, a center airbag between the front seats significantly contributed to solid protection for both adults and children, effectively preventing dangerous head collisions of the occupants during a side impact.

Škoda Enyaq iV: Phenomenal passive protection

The Škoda Enyaq iV was evaluated a year earlier, in 2021. In these tests, it recorded one of the best results in history for adult occupant protection, reaching an impressive 94%. Although the methodology for testing assistants in 2021 was slightly less comprehensive than in the following year (which is reflected in the 82% for assistance systems), the Enyaq iV clearly proved its immense structural rigidity and was even named the safest car in its class for that year by Euro NCAP.

Comparison of key parameters

Note to the table: The vehicles were tested according to different methodologies in 2021 and 2022; the resulting percentages are based on different criteria and are not entirely directly comparable.

In conclusion, it can be said with certainty that both vehicles offer the absolute maximum in terms of safety for four-year-old used cars. While the Škoda Enyaq iV relies primarily on excellent passive safety and an exceptionally rigid cabin, the Nissan Ariya offers a slightly more modern and comprehensive safety package in terms of active assistants. This reflects its stricter testing from 2022 and makes it a more comprehensively protected vehicle meeting newer standards in accident prevention.

In addition to standard equipment, each model offers several unique features that can be decisive for the customer and clearly show that both cars provide much more than just the bare basics, with each having its own distinctive approach to added value.

Nissan Ariya: Japanese Zen and Technological Minimalism

• Interior and smart design: The car's cabin evokes a luxury lounge thanks to the absence of a traditional center tunnel. A completely unique feature is the climate controls, which are integrated directly into the wooden dashboard trim in the form of haptic buttons. Practicality is highlighted by an electrically sliding center console and a hidden pull-out storage compartment under the dashboard.
• Seats and comfort: The Ariya uses so-called "Zero Gravity" seats, which Nissan developed in collaboration with NASA. They are designed to minimize fatigue on long journeys and provide optimal spinal support.
• Powertrain and chassis: For all-wheel-drive versions, Nissan developed the e-4ORCE technology. This system independently controls both electric motors and, in addition to perfect traction, can suppress longitudinal body pitch during acceleration and braking, significantly increasing ride comfort for the occupants.
• Infotainment and electronics: The dashboard is dominated by two interconnected 12.3-inch displays with minimalist graphics. Over-the-air (OTA) software updates and advanced voice assistance are a matter of course.
• Assistance systems: ProPILOT technology combines adaptive cruise control with advanced lane-keeping. It uses navigation data, allowing the car to automatically slow down before sharp curves or roundabouts.

Škoda Enyaq iV: Crystalline Design and Smart Practicality

• Smart solutions for every day: The traditional "Simply Clever" philosophy has successfully transformed into the era of electromobility. The Enyaq iV features an umbrella hidden in the driver's door, an ice scraper cleverly tucked away in the tailgate (instead of the fuel filler flap), and there's also a special charging cable cleaner or a practical organizer under the trunk floor.
• Design and iconic features: An unmistakable optional feature is the "Crystal Face" – an illuminated front grille made up of 131 LEDs, which gives the car a unique light signature and an animated welcome effect when the vehicle is unlocked.
• Technology and telematics: The interior is dominated by a giant central display measuring up to 13 inches. However, a true technological treat is the augmented reality (AR) head-up display, which projects navigation arrows and assistant warnings so they appear to lie directly on the road ahead of the vehicle.
• Sustainability and materials: For higher trim levels (so-called Design Selections), Škoda focuses on ecology. The ecoSuite variant uses leather tanned with an eco-friendly olive leaf extract, while the Lodge upholstery combines natural wool with polyester obtained from recycled PET bottles.
• Sport variants: For drivers desiring a dynamic look, the Enyaq offers Sportline versions and the top-of-the-line RS model. These variants differ not only in more aggressive bumpers and black body details but also in a lowered sports chassis and specific steering tuning that provides a firmer and more precise response.

The Nissan Ariya will primarily appeal to drivers looking for an unusual design, premium materials, and maximum acoustic and driving comfort in an electric vehicle. It is an ideal choice for those who don't mind a slight compromise in absolute luggage volume but all the more appreciate the feeling of luxury and the sophisticated all-wheel drive.

The Škoda Enyaq iV is a completely rational and safe choice for families who need to maximize interior space and rely on unrivaled practicality. Although older versions of the onboard system may have their teething problems, as a whole, the Enyaq scores with great usability, more affordable servicing, and an excellent price-performance ratio on the secondary market.

Based on breakdown statistics, service center reports, user feedback, and findings from our CarAudit service, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems that buyers of used electric vehicles should watch out for.

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya is a relatively innovative model that capitalizes on the brand's previous experience in the field of electromobility; however, several typical defects appeared in the first model years.

• Software and infotainment: In early models, the most common complaints include occasional freezing of the multimedia system, slower touch response, or random restarts of the digital instrument cluster while driving. Most of these issues are resolvable via over-the-air (OTA) software updates.
• Drive System (Inverter): In some cars from early production, an error occurred in the inverter control software, which could lead to an unexpected loss of power and disconnection of the drivetrain. Nissan addressed this issue with a recall and reprogramming of the affected units.
• Thermal management and charging: Some owners report issues with reduced fast charging (DC) performance in colder weather, which is usually caused by imperfect battery preheating software.
• Electrical system and 12V battery: There are also isolated cases of excessive discharge of the conventional 12V battery due to the onboard system waking up while the car is parked, preventing a subsequent "start."

Škoda Enyaq iV

The Škoda Enyaq iV, built on the group's MEB platform, is very common on the used car market at around four years of age, and therefore many of its typical teething troubles are well-documented.

• Infotainment and onboard software: By far the most common problem for models manufactured until 2022 (before software version ME3) is a freezing onboard system. Typical issues include slow response at startup, black screens, navigation restarts, and communication failures with the mobile app. An independent technical inspection of the vehicle always aims to check whether the system has already been updated to a more stable version at an authorized service center.
• Capacitive steering wheel and assistance systems: An extremely frequent defect is the popping up of Travel Assist and Emergency Assist error messages. The fault is usually caused by a defective sensor in the capacitive steering wheel. Repair most often requires replacing the entire steering wheel rim.
• Chassis and rear brakes: Due to the vehicle's high weight, creaking and knocking from the front axle (especially control arm bushings and stabilizers) appear relatively early when driving over bumps. The rear drum brakes can seize or squeal during braking due to frequent use of recuperation and the absence of strong mechanical friction.
• Heat pump: Some units had factory problems with the optional heat pump circuit, which experienced refrigerant leaks or software valve errors, significantly limiting heating performance in winter months.

When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key. Here are some specific points to focus on for these two models, especially if you are choosing examples approximately three to four years old.

When choosing a Nissan Ariya:

• 12V battery condition and "false" error messages: A weak 12V battery is the most common source of minor but frustrating problems. It often causes random "Service EV System" warnings on the dashboard, sensor disconnections, or even the inability to start the car at all. During the test drive, watch for any warning lights and ideally insist on a diagnostic check of the auxiliary battery voltage.
• Infotainment behavior and screen freezing: Software bugs were quite common in early production. This can lead to central screen restarts, camera failures, or slow navigation. Give the system time during the test drive – pair your phone with Apple CarPlay or Android Auto, switch driving modes, and test the response of the digital buttons on the wood trim.
• DC fast charging stability: Some owners of used cars complain about unexpected interruptions in fast charging or a slower charging curve than promised by the official specs. If possible, try connecting the car to a public fast charger during the test drive and see if the process starts smoothly without error messages.
• Tyre wear: The Nissan Ariya is a heavy car with massive and instant torque, which can quickly take its toll on the front (or both) axles. During a thorough physical inspection of the used car, carefully check the tread depth and, above all, the uniformity of tyre wear.

When choosing a Škoda Enyaq iV:

• Slow MIB3 system: In 2021 and 2022 models (before the major update and transition to the MIB4 system in newer models), a frequently freezing or slow-responding infotainment is a known weakness. Check the current software version (the car should ideally have the ME3 wireless update or higher). Quickly go through the climate control and assistance settings – jerky responses may indicate the need for a software reflash.
• Brake disc corrosion: Because the Enyaq decelerates very effectively using recuperation, the mechanical brakes are often underused. During the test drive on a safe stretch of road, shift to neutral (or turn off recuperation) and brake firmly several times. If you feel vibrations in the pedal or hear a significant humming sound, the brakes are rusted or already warped.
• Battery protection frame and chassis: The high-voltage battery in the floor is quite exposed in the Enyaq due to its long wheelbase. While normal scratches from branches don't matter, deeper gouges or dents in the frame can represent a costly risk of damage. To reveal any consequences of hitting a high curb, an independent technical inspection of the car on a lift is necessary.
• Heat pump functionality: If the car is equipped with the optional heat pump, test the heating efficiency carefully. This system in the Enyaq uses a specific refrigerant, R744 (CO2). Any leaks or compressor replacements require special equipment that not every service center has, making repairs quite expensive.
• KESSY system and 12V network drainage: Older Enyaq units suffered from parasitic drain from modules that didn't go to sleep after locking. This quietly destroyed the 12V battery and manifested itself, among other things, in failures of the KESSY keyless entry. While walking around the car, try repeatedly locking and unlocking all doors simply by touching the handle.

Sources: ADAC, novinky.cz, e15.cz, autohome.cz, elektromobil.cz, rallylife.cz

This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.