
BMW M2 vs. Mercedes-AMG C 63: Complete comparison 2026
BMW M2 vs Mercedes-AMG C 63: A detailed comparison of performance, driving, and price. Find out which sports coupé is the right choice for you in our test.
Apr 14, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Detailed comparison of the BMW M4 vs. Jaguar F-Type. Discover real-world experiences, performance and equipment comparisons, and our verdict to help you choose your sports car.
April 24, 2026


BMW M4 represents the pinnacle of German engineering, perfectly combining aggressive design with uncompromising sporting performance for both daily use and spirited track driving. In contrast, the Jaguar F-Type brings pure British elegance to the segment with dramatic lines and a charismatic sound that will appeal to every lover of emotive sports cars. Let's take a detailed look together at which of these two exceptional machines offers a better overall driving experience and represents a more sensible choice on the nearly-new used car market.
When you place approximately four-year-old BMW M4 (G82/G83 generation) and Jaguar F-Type models after their facelift side by side, you will immediately notice a completely different approach to design and proportions, which is clearly reflected in their exterior dimensions. While the Munich-based BMW uses the extended platform of the more practical 4 Series and reaches an impressive length of up to 4801 mm, the Jaguar F-Type strictly maintains the proportions of a classic, compact sports car with a length of just 4470 mm. The BMW is thus more than 300 mm longer, which brings a fundamental benefit in the form of a full-fledged second row of seats and a more spacious trunk. If you are looking for a sports car that can carry not only you but also two other passengers in relative comfort over the weekend, the extended body of the BMW M4 is an absolutely clear choice.
In terms of width and height, however, the tables turn in favor of the exotic-looking British beast. The Jaguar F-Type, at 1923 mm, is slightly wider than the standard BMW M4 (1887 mm, excluding special editions like the CSL), but most importantly, it is significantly lower by 80 to 90 mm. With a height of just 1311 mm for the Coupé version, the F-Type has an extremely low-slung silhouette, which guarantees not only a lower center of gravity and a better aerodynamic profile but also a look approaching that of supercars. When choosing, it depends on whether you prefer the ultimate, sporty seating position just above the asphalt in the Jaguar, or if you appreciate the more compromising taller build of the BMW M4, which makes daily entry easier and provides a noticeably better view from the cabin into city traffic.
A completely different experience behind the wheel is then dictated by the wheelbase. The BMW M4 features a generous wheelbase of 2857 mm within its class, while the F-Type relies on a short 2622 mm. The gap of 235 mm means that the short Jaguar reacts to steering inputs noticeably more nervously, more aggressively, and feels much more agile on winding backroads. The BMW, on the other hand, benefits from excellent directional stability on highways due to its long wheelbase and feels much more confident during high-speed cornering through long curves. The choice between these two cars, in the context of their size, boils down to whether you want a purist, agile, and slightly restless two-seater weekend machine, or if you are looking for a more versatile "GT" that can easily handle the role of a high-performance daily driver with its dimensions.
| Parameter | BMW M4 Coupé | Jaguar F-Type Coupé | BMW M4 Convertible | Jaguar F-Type Convertible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Width (mm) | 1887 - 1921 | 1923 | 1887 | 1923 |
| Length (mm) | 4794 - 4801 | 4470 | 4794 - 4801 | 4470 |
| Height (mm) | 1386 - 1398 | 1311 | 1395 - 1399 | 1307 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2857 | 2622 | 2857 | 2622 |
While luggage space is usually not the main selling point for sports cars, it plays a surprisingly important role in everyday life. The difference between the BMW M4 and Jaguar F-Type in this area perfectly reflects their different design philosophies. While the Munich-based contender functions as a full-fledged four-seater built on the platform of the classic 4 Series, the British beast is strictly a two-seater from the ground up. This has a huge impact on overall practicality and family usability. If you are looking for an attractive car that will not only thrill you with its performance on your favorite backroads but also won't require you to solve a logistical headache before leaving for vacation, this parameter will make your choice much easier.
The BMW M4 in its current relevant generation (G82 Coupé and G83 Convertible) offers a trunk that stands up to comparison with regular family cars. The Coupé version has a very generous base volume of 440 liters. It thus provides space for several extra suitcases and is completely sufficient for weekend shopping or a longer vacation for two or three people. Furthermore, the practicality of the Coupé model is extended by the rear seats, which can be folded (40:20:40 split), allowing for the easy transport of long items, although the manufacturer does not specify the exact value of the total maximum volume for this body type. The open-top M4 Convertible logically requires compromises due to the need to store the fabric roof. In its basic configuration, it offers 300 liters, but with the roof up, the space can be slightly expanded to 385 liters.
The Jaguar F-Type (X152 generation) is significantly more modest in terms of both interior and luggage space. Since it is a pure two-seater sports car, you don't even have the option to toss jackets or hand luggage onto the back seats – everything simply has to go in the trunk. The closed Coupé offers a standard volume of 310 liters (Jaguar states a value of 408 liters when loaded to the roof), which is enough for daily use, but the trunk is very shallow and wide. Those who long for the open sky must prepare for very cramped conditions in the F-Type Convertible. Its trunk volume drops to just 207 liters, making it a space that can accommodate soft travel bags at most. The decision is therefore clear: while the F-Type forces you to pack very sparingly, the BMW M4 adapts to your needs with complete ease.
| Parameter | BMW M4 Coupé | Jaguar F-Type Coupé | BMW M4 Convertible | Jaguar F-Type Convertible |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base volume (liters) | 440 | 310 | 300 | 207 |
| Max. volume after folding (liters) | Not available | Cannot be folded | 385 | Cannot be folded |
The BMW M4 clearly wins with its ability to combine extreme sports performance with a full-sized trunk for everyday use, while the two-seater Jaguar F-Type will please enthusiasts who are willing to tolerate significant compromises when packing.
When choosing a purebred sports car like the BMW M4 (G82 generation, from 2021) or the Jaguar F-Type, towing capacity is not the primary metric being watched. However, for many buyers, the absence of a tow bar can have a major impact on overall practicality. In a comparison of these roughly four-year-old used cars, the situation is completely clear – the standard and maximum weight of a braked and unbraked trailer for both cars is exactly 0 kg. Both manufacturers simply did not homologate these high-performance models for towing from the factory. There are no specific or hybrid versions with reduced or different capacities in the range; all engine options rely purely on performance, where the installation of a tow bar would disrupt weight distribution, aerodynamics, and the function of the massive rear diffuser. From a practical perspective, this represents a clear limitation: if you like to travel, you won't gain space for several extra suitcases with the help of a trailer, nor will you secure enough capacity for weekend shopping for larger items or a longer camping holiday. In conclusion, these two sporting gems are completely aligned in the area of towing, and if the ability to hitch a trailer is a necessity, you must consider a different category of vehicle, such as performance SUVs.
| Model and engine | Braked trailer weight (kg) | Unbraked trailer weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| BMW M4 (all versions) | 0 | 0 |
| Jaguar F-Type (all versions) | 0 | 0 |
The approach to engine options in these two sports cars clearly demonstrates their different focuses, which is a key factor for used car buyers. The BMW M4 stays true to its tradition, relying on an uncompromising twin-turbocharged inline-six that excels in sharpness, precise response, and, at the top end, technologies from the world of motorsport. The Jaguar F-Type, on the other hand, offers a wider range of concepts, from a lighter four-cylinder to a charismatic supercharged V8. For buyers of roughly four-year-old used cars, this means a choice between the cold, track-focused efficiency of the BMW and the theatrical British experience with the inimitable sound of the Jaguar.
When looking for a roughly four-year-old model, you will encounter the G82 (Coupé) and G83 (Convertible) generation on the market, which has been in production since 2021. The heart of all versions is the brilliant 3.0-liter inline-six (S58) with two turbochargers. A standout is the standard model with 353 kW (480 hp), which is one of the last in its class to offer a 6-speed manual transmission and rear-wheel drive. However, most buyers opt for the more powerful Competition variant (375 kW / 510 hp), which is paired as standard with an 8-speed M Steptronic automatic and also offers the optional lightning-fast M xDrive all-wheel drive. For collectors and absolute enthusiasts, there are the limited lightweight CSL and CS editions, which extract a massive 405 kW (550 hp) from the engine.
| Engine Type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| M4 (3.0 Twin-Turbo I6) | Petrol | 353 | 550 | 6-speed manual |
| M4 Competition (3.0 Twin-Turbo I6) | Petrol | 375 | 650 | 8-speed automatic |
| M4 CSL / CS (3.0 Twin-Turbo I6) | Petrol | 405 | 650 | 8-speed automatic |
In the case of roughly four-year-old used cars, we are talking about the updated version of the Jaguar F-Type (facelift from late 2019), which significantly simplified the engine lineup. The base is a 2.0-liter turbocharged Ingenium four-cylinder in the P300 version (221 kW / 300 hp), which gives the car lightness on the front axle. The real draw, however, is the large-displacement 5.0-liter supercharged V8, available either in the "milder" P450 version (331 kW / 450 hp) or in the top-tier R variant or the limited R75 with a massive 423 kW (575 hp) and 700 Nm of torque. All updated versions rely on the 8-speed Quickshift automatic transmission. It is important to mention that the popular supercharged V6s (P340 and P380) were withdrawn from the range at the end of 2019, so you will no longer find them in popular four-year-old post-facelift used cars.
| Engine Type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| P300 (2.0 Turbo I4) | Petrol | 221 | 400 | 8-speed automatic |
| P340 (3.0 Supercharged V6)* | Petrol | 250 | 450 | 8-speed automatic |
| P380 (3.0 Supercharged V6)* | Petrol | 279 | 460 | 8-speed automatic |
| P450 (5.0 Supercharged V8) | Petrol | 331 | 580 | 8-speed automatic |
| R / R75 (5.0 Supercharged V8) | Petrol | 423 | 700 | 8-speed automatic |
*Note: Production of the V6 engines (P340 and P380) ended in 2019. These engines thus represent older models and are no longer available in four-year-old cars.
While the BMW M4 dominates thanks to its track-tuned six-cylinder and engineering precision, the Jaguar F-Type charms with its old-school supercharged V8 and dramatic sound profile.
Choosing the right engine is absolutely crucial for long-term satisfaction with these sports cars. While BMW relies on the constant evolution and refinement of its iconic three-liter twin-turbocharged inline-six for roughly four-year-old used cars, Jaguar, in the same period, offers either a rational but less characterful turbocharged four-cylinder or, conversely, a charismatic, supercharged five-liter V8. Our recommendations below are based on real-world experience, the balance between daily dynamics and actual fuel consumption, user feedback, and the mechanical reliability of used examples.
For the G82 generation (available on the used market from roughly 2021), the more powerful Competition version paired with xDrive all-wheel drive is clearly the best and most sought-after choice. The turbocharged inline-six, codenamed S58, is a mechanical masterpiece that delivers a massive 650 Nm of torque across an exceptionally wide rev range. In real-world driving, it also surprises with reasonable fuel consumption, which can be kept around 10 to 11 liters per 100 km at a steady highway pace. Compared to the previous generation (S55 in the F82 version), this engine is significantly more robust, and the manufacturer has resolved the known issues with the crankshaft center bolt. Nevertheless, the engine requires maximum care – it is essential to shorten the oil change interval to a maximum of 10 to 15 thousand kilometers to prevent lubricant degradation under load. The xDrive version gives the car incredible traction, eliminating the rear-axle nervousness of older models. This makes it a perfect choice for drivers looking for an uncompromising sports car that can be used safely and effectively year-round, even by less experienced drivers.
Although a lighter two-liter four-cylinder P300 is also available for four-year-old used cars (after the 2020 facelift), for a true sports Jaguar experience, we clearly recommend the supercharged five-liter V8 in the P450 version. This unit represents the absolute "sweet spot" in the range – it is significantly more characterful than the base four-cylinder and, at the same time, noticeably more affordable to purchase and operate than the top-of-the-line, extremely stiff R version (575 hp). Its main technical advantage is immediate throttle response thanks to the use of a mechanical supercharger, linear power delivery, and a magnificent, deep exhaust note that simply belongs to a British grand tourer. The reliability of the five-liter is very good in these late production stages (model year 2021 and newer). However, when inspecting the car, it pays to check the cooling system in detail – typical but solvable weaknesses include minor coolant leaks around the water pump or the plastic pipes within the engine's V-block (it is worth replacing the water pump preventatively around the 100,000 km mark). This engine is ideal for enthusiastic drivers and lovers of weekend drives or long journeys who prefer an emotional experience and classic mechanical response over chasing hundredths of a second on a race track.
When choosing a high-performance sports car, official fuel consumption is often just a theoretical value pulled from laboratory measurements, which can differ significantly from everyday reality on the roads. The true appetite of these beasts is only revealed by heavy city traffic, highway commutes, and above all, the driver's heavy foot on a favorite backroad. To get the most accurate picture for the market of roughly four-year-old used cars, we compared currently available engine options where a comparison makes the most sense (for BMW, this is the G82 generation introduced in 2021; for Jaguar, the facelifted X152 model from 2020–2022). The data basis consists of real long-term records from hundreds of owners on the crowdsourcing portal Spritmonitor.de.
| Model and engine | Average consumption (l/100 km) | Source |
|---|---|---|
| Jaguar F-Type 2.0 P300 (221 kW) | 9.5 | Spritmonitor.de |
| BMW M4 Coupé (353 kW) | 11.2 | Spritmonitor.de |
| BMW M4 Competition (375 kW) | 11.8 | Spritmonitor.de |
| Jaguar F-Type 5.0 V8 P450 (331 kW) | 12.1 | Spritmonitor.de |
| Jaguar F-Type 5.0 V8 R (423 kW) | 13.2 | Spritmonitor.de |
Looking closely at the data, several interesting trends can be identified. Since you will encounter exclusively petrol engines in this performance league, and a comparison of diesel engines is logically irrelevant here, the main benchmark is the efficiency of forced induction across different architectures. On paper and in reality, the "most economical" variant is, as expected, Jaguar's turbocharged two-liter four-cylinder labeled P300. It is the only one capable of staying below the ten-liter mark in the long term during a normal cycle. A surprising finding, however, is the phenomenal efficiency of Munich engineering: although the BMW M4 has a twin-turbocharged three-liter inline-six with much more brutal power than the British four-cylinder, consumption jumps on average only to values around 11.2 to 11.8 liters. Jaguar, on the other hand, with its full-fat supercharged V8s, represents the thirsty old school – the massive five-liter displacement simply cannot be denied, and real-world figures for the P450 and the sharper R version commonly reach over 12 and 13 liters.
For the typical driver looking for a stylish coupe for daily city commuting who wants to at least partially save on the fuel budget, the base Jaguar F-Type P300 is likely the most sensible choice. Enthusiasts, on the other hand, who prefer to cover hundreds of kilometers in fast highway transfers or enjoy visiting tracks, will usually forgo the extra two liters and go straight for the BMW M4. It is the German representative that makes huge sense from a value-for-money perspective – you get incomparably more dynamics and excellent efficiency for every liter burned. Lovers of British extravagance who, by contrast, sign up for the V8 Jaguar, simply have to expect occasional "whirlpools in the tank" at gas stations.
Taking all these factors into account, it is evident that fuel consumption should not be the main deciding factor for cars with this focus, as it rather just underlines the overall character of the vehicle. A buyer interested in the five-liter Jaguar F-Type smilingly accepts that they will pay extra for the phenomenal sound of the supercharged V8, while the precise German six-cylinder in the BMW M4 fascinates drivers with its exemplary alignment of extreme performance and surprising operational frugality. In the end, owners buy both cars primarily with their hearts, not based on consumption tables.
When examining the market for approximately four-year-old used cars (2021 and 2022 models), we encounter interesting differences in how both models hold their value. At this age, the Bavarian coupé is offered in its current and technologically advanced G82 generation, while the British beast figures on the market in its significantly modernized (facelifted) version of the first generation, which brought a more aggressive look and a narrowed, yet all the more characterful, range of engines.
Thanks to unrelenting demand and the excellent reputation of the BMW M division, this model holds its value very confidently. Furthermore, the market offers a relatively wide selection across various specifications.
For Jaguar, the rate of depreciation and the final used car price are primarily determined by the engine hidden under the long hood. The F-Type traditionally suffers from steeper depreciation than its German competitor. However, what is a disadvantage for the first owner represents a fantastic opportunity for a second-hand buyer.
| Model and Focus | Approximate Starting Price | Typical Price for a Well-Maintained Unit | Top Versions / Low Mileage |
|---|---|---|---|
| BMW M4 (G82) | €66,000 | €84,000 | €103,000 and more |
| Jaguar F-Type (Facelift) | €49,000 | €72,000 | €99,000 |
Note: Prices take into account both the Czech and European markets and may vary depending on current supply, vehicle condition, verifiable service history, and additional equipment.
A look at used car price lists reveals one clear fact: from a value retention perspective, the BMW M4 is a much more stable harbor, and there is also a significantly wider selection on the market. In contrast, the Jaguar F-Type in its facelifted version speaks mainly to those looking for uncompromising character. Thanks to the steeper price drop of British cars, an enticing equation applies – for the money that would suffice for a standard BMW M4, you can purchase a majestic, full-blooded supercharged V8, whose performance is an absolute unique on the used car market in its class.
While the BMW M4 holds its value more reliably thanks to its capabilities and modern technology, the British Jaguar F-Type provides a substantially more affordable entry ticket into the world of the classic roaring V8 on the used car market.
Although buyers of premium sports cars often automatically expect a full five-star rating in Euro NCAP tests, when choosing on the used car market, it is always extremely important to consider the overall context and the specific year of the tests. The methodology of independent Euro NCAP tests is constantly evolving and becoming significantly stricter over time. Advanced frontal crash simulations, stricter cyclist detection, and testing of vehicle reactions at blind intersections are being gradually introduced. For this reason, percentage scores from different periods cannot be directly compared, as an older five-star result might no longer suffice for the maximum rating by today's standards.
The BMW M4 shares its safety rating with the more conventional 4 Series (and the technically related 3 Series), which underwent independent barrier tests in 2019 and took home the highest five-star rating. The Bavarian coupe excelled primarily in adult occupant protection with an impressive result of 97%, and it also achieved a great 93% in the protection of vulnerable road users. Child protection was rated at a very good 83%, and safety assistance systems scored 72%. Although the certification took place before the massive introduction of the strictest assistance tests for urban traffic after 2020, the data demonstrate excellent body rigidity and highly reliable autonomous braking.
The Jaguar F-Type, on the other hand, represents a completely different case in terms of independent data. Since its market launch, it has never been officially tested by Euro NCAP, which is, however, a relatively common practice for exclusive sports cars with low production volumes. The British automaker has, of course, equipped the car with a range of passive and active features, including autonomous emergency braking, lane keep assist, and a full set of airbags. However, the complete absence of an independent certificate means that the actual level of passive safety during an impact cannot be objectively verified and compared with the rest of the market. For this reason, no values appear for the F-Type model in the Euro NCAP tables.
From the perspective of safety and peace of mind, the BMW M4 represents a more transparent and objectively more modern choice for buyers of an approximately four-year-old used car. Its extraordinary crash test results offer real proof of reliable protection, whereas with the Jaguar F-Type, in the absence of independent data, you must rely solely on the manufacturer's internal claims.
| Parameter | BMW M4 | Jaguar F-Type |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | 2019 | Not tested |
| Adult occupant protection | 97 % | - |
| Child protection | 83 % | - |
| Vulnerable road user protection | 93 % | - |
| Safety assistance systems | 72 % | - |
While the BMW M4 offers top-tier and independently verified safety backed by a full five-star rating from 2019, the Jaguar F-Type has never undergone official crash tests, making the German model a much more transparent and secure choice.
In addition to standard equipment, both models offer much more than just basic functions, and each approaches added value in its own unique way.
Crushing performance and dynamics thanks to the S58 six-cylinder engine (up to 510 hp in the Competition version)
Phenomenal driving characteristics with the option of the excellent M xDrive all-wheel drive
Significantly higher daily practicality thanks to the 2+2 seating arrangement and a more voluminous trunk
Modern, lightning-fast iDrive infotainment and top-tier assistance systems
Better availability of service and spare parts
Controversial front grille design that may not suit everyone's taste
Noticeable increase in curb weight compared to the previous generation
Driving behavior at the limit can feel slightly synthetic and detached
The BMW M4 (G82 generation) is the ultimate tool for drivers who want uncompromising speed on the track but also require a car capable of daily commuting. Technological sophistication and interior space make it a highly rational choice in the performance coupe category, where pure elegance has been replaced by aggressive functionality.
Beautiful, timeless British design with the proportions of a classic sports car
Absolutely phenomenal and addictive sound, especially in variants with the supercharged V8 engine
Low driving position and an authentic driving feel in a purebred two-seater
A more distinct mark of exclusivity and uniqueness on the road
Very limited practicality due to the strictly two-seater cabin and small trunk
More outdated infotainment and older interior architecture compared to German competitors
In direct comparison, it does not achieve such precision and sharpness during hard driving on the track
Faster depreciation on the used car market and potentially higher costs for specific servicing
The Jaguar F-Type is a purely emotional choice embodying traditional automotive passion, British charm, and unmistakable character. It will primarily appeal to individualists looking for a charismatic car for weekend fun on backroads, who are willing to forgive its poorer daily practicality and older electronic equipment.
Based on long-term feedback from owners, service reports, and experience from our independent technical inspections, we have compiled an overview of the most common issues that potential buyers of these approximately four-year-old sports models should watch out for.
The G82 generation is currently rated very highly in terms of mechanical reliability; however, even this ultimate sports car experiences specific issues stemming from its purpose and complex technology.
The BMW M4 G82 is exceptionally durable mechanically, and the S58 engine is among the best on the market. Most owner complaints are limited to acoustic discomfort from the brakes, the impracticality of certain interior elements, and minor software shortcomings.
Although the British automaker has improved the reliability of its models in recent years, used F-Types still require a careful approach and face a number of ailments, often related to cooling and specific electronics.
The Jaguar F-Type is a charismatic sports car whose reliability depends heavily on preventive maintenance. Future owners should especially monitor the condition of the cooling system and be prepared for the occasional resolution of minor electronic equipment faults.
When buying a used sports car, a thorough physical car inspection is absolutely crucial. Here are several specific points you should focus on for both models to avoid unpleasant surprises after the purchase.
The BMW M4 is significantly more usable for daily driving thanks to its four-seat cabin and good outward visibility. The Jaguar F-Type, on the other hand, is a strictly two-seater sports car with limited interior space, designed primarily for weekend experiences. Furthermore, the German representative can better dampen the bumps of ordinary roads in comfort mode.
The BMW M4 has a significant advantage, with its 440-liter trunk easily accommodating the luggage of two people even for a longer vacation. The Jaguar F-Type offers a more modest 310 liters in the coupe version, and if you choose the convertible version, the trunk volume drops to just 207 liters. Additionally, the BMW allows the rear backrests to be folded down to carry significantly longer items.
No, only the Jaguar F-Type of this pair offers a supercharged V8, which gives it an unmistakable and very dramatic sound. The BMW M4 relies exclusively on a 3.0-liter twin-turbocharged inline-six with excellent pull. While the British car scores with its theatrical character, the six-cylinder from BMW M dominates with lightning-fast response and overall dynamics.
Thanks to top-tier tuning from the M division, a stiffer body, and advanced electronics, the BMW M4 is clearly faster and sharper on the race track. The Jaguar F-Type functions more like a traditional fast car in the Gran Turismo category, so it feels more cumbersome and less precise in limit situations. For regular visits to track days, the M4 is the absolute clear favorite.
For both high-performance premium vehicles, one must expect high expenditures for servicing, premium fuel, sports tires, and high-performance brakes. The S58 inline-six generation in the BMW M4 is considered mechanically exceptionally robust, but potential repairs to specific carbon parts are very expensive. While the Jaguar relies on a proven five-liter unit, owners more frequently encounter minor faults with the onboard electronics.
Choosing between an approximately four-year-old BMW M4 and a Jaguar F-Type represents a classic battle of top-tier engineering precision against pure automotive emotion. Thanks to its extraordinary dynamics, advanced technologies, and a much more practical concept with a larger trunk, the Munich coupe is the ideal choice for those seeking an uncompromising track tool that is reliably usable for every day. In contrast, the strictly two-seater British beast will primarily appeal to individualists who prefer timeless design, the inimitable sound of a supercharged engine, and can overlook the lesser everyday usability. While the BMW M4 represents a more rational investment with objectively better and more confident driving characteristics, the Jaguar F-Type attracts buyers on the used car market as a more affordable and exceptionally charismatic entry ticket into the world of traditional sports cars.
Sources: ADAC, novinky.cz, idnes.cz, auto-mania.cz, autoexpress.cz, youngtimer.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

BMW M2 vs Mercedes-AMG C 63: A detailed comparison of performance, driving, and price. Find out which sports coupé is the right choice for you in our test.
Apr 14, 2026

Mercedes-AMG A 45 (A45 AMG) vs Volkswagen Golf R (VW Golf R). Detailed comparison of performance, driving characteristics, and real-world costs. Which hot hatch to choose?
Apr 19, 2026

Detailed comparison of the Lamborghini Huracán and Maserati MC20. We compared real-world performance, driving characteristics, and reliability. Read our verdict before you buy!
Apr 20, 2026