
Honda Accord vs. Škoda Superb: Complete comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of Honda Accord vs. Škoda Superb. Discover real-world experiences, equipment and driving characteristics comparisons, and read the verdict for the best choice.
Apr 21, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Detailed comparison of the Audi A4 and Volvo S60. Discover the differences in driving characteristics, equipment, and reliability of used cars. Read our verdict and make the right choice!
April 22, 2026


The Audi A4 has long been considered the benchmark of the German premium mid-size class, attracting drivers with its precise driving characteristics, advanced technologies, and top-tier interior craftsmanship. In contrast, the Swedish Volvo S60 represents a distinctive alternative with elegant Scandinavian design, placing maximum emphasis on unrivaled safety, passenger comfort, and innovative powertrains. Let's take a detailed look at how these two exceptional sedans compare and which one represents the smarter choice for your next used car purchase.
When choosing a used representative of the premium mid-size class, with a production date around 2020 to 2022 (i.e., cars roughly 4 years old), two slightly different philosophies face off. On one side of the ring stands the German Audi A4 in its popular B9 generation (after a significant facelift), on the other, the dynamically styled third generation of the Swedish Volvo S60. Although both cars target a similarly demanding customer, even when comparing external physical proportions, we encounter noticeable differences that directly dictate their daily use.
The Swedish sedan is slightly larger in all key dimensions than its German rival. The third generation of the Volvo S60 measures 4,778 mm in length, outgrowing the Audi A4 (with a length of 4,762 mm) by 16 millimeters. However, Volvo's real ace up its sleeve is the wheelbase, which stands at an above-standard 2,872 mm. That is a full 52 mm more than the Audi (2,820 mm). In practice, these extra centimeters translate into significantly more legroom for rear-seat passengers, making the Nordic car a much more pleasant place for adult passengers on longer journeys. Furthermore, the Volvo's wider stance (1,850 mm compared to 1,847 mm for the Audi) gives the car a visually and physically more stable presence on the road.
However, the Audi A4 successfully counters with immense versatility, which significantly expands its target group. While the S60 designation at Volvo strictly means a classic sedan with more difficult trunk access, the Audi A4 family offers a choice. In addition to the sedan, you can get a highly practical estate (Avant), and even an off-road styled and raised Allroad variant. Classic Audi versions are also slightly shorter and lower, which counts in today's design of cramped city parking garages. The more compact footprint means the Audi is slightly more nimble to maneuver and makes it easier to judge the distance to the rear bumper when parallel parking.
Key advantages and disadvantages in terms of dimensions:
From an overall perspective of external dimensions, the interpretation is clear. If you are looking for a stylish executive sedan and your main concern is that adults in the back seats have maximum comfort, the long wheelbase of the Volvo S60 will work in your favor. However, if your priority is absolute daily utility combined with transporting strollers or a dog, the more universal dimensional philosophy of Audi's estate body styles simply makes more sense.
| Parameter | Audi A4 Sedan | Volvo S60 Sedan | Audi A4 Estate | Volvo S60 Estate |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Width (mm) | 1847 | 1850 | 1842 - 1847 | - |
| Length (mm) | 4762 | 4778 | 4738 - 4762 | - |
| Height (mm) | 1428 | 1431 | 1434 - 1493 | - |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2820 | 2872 | 2818 - 2820 | - |
Note: The range for Audi A4 Estate bodies covers the standard Avant model as well as the raised Allroad model (which reflects the higher height values). Volvo does not offer an estate body under the S60 model but has separated it into a completely independent V60 line.
When it comes to choosing a nearly-new premium used car around four years old (i.e., model generations from 2021 or 2022), luggage capacity plays a key role, especially if you plan to use the vehicle as your primary family car. This comparison pits two representatives of different approaches against each other. While the Audi A4 (B9 generation) offers customers both a classic sedan and an exceptionally practical estate (referred to as Avant or Allroad), the third-generation Volvo S60 relies purely on an elegant sedan shape. Those who need to transport truly large loads with the Swedish brand must logically opt for the derived V60 model, which is not the subject of this comparison. The differences in practicality between the evaluated cars thus represent a crucial point for any buyer who often carries more than just a laptop backpack and a few shopping bags.
Looking at the exact figures, the Audi A4 in sedan version offers a basic trunk volume of 460 to 480 liters, which grows to 965 liters after folding down the rear seats. However, if you choose the popular Estate (Avant) variant, you get a generous 495 liters under the load cover. After folding the backrests, this space increases to an impressive 1,495 liters, a size perfectly sufficient for a weekend shop or a longer holiday with the whole family. The competing Volvo S60 lags somewhat behind its German rival in total capacity, and its standard volume also varies significantly depending on the chosen powertrain. Conventional and mild-hybrid versions have a space of 427 to 442 liters, but with the widely represented plug-in hybrids (Recharge or T8 models), one must account for a reduced capacity of 391 liters, as the traction battery takes up valuable space. With the rear seatbacks folded, the Volvo S60 can offer a maximum capacity of approximately 754 liters.
In practice, these differences mean a fairly vast gap in usability. The Audi A4, primarily thanks to the estate body with its more vertical rear and excellent access, becomes a universal tool into which you can easily fit space for several extra suitcases, sports equipment, or a bulky stroller. The Volvo S60 is a design-clean and stylish car, but the sedan morphology with a smaller loading aperture and a narrow tunnel profile after folding the rear backrests clearly limits the transport of bulkier items. The reduced trunk volume of the popular hybrid Volvo can represent a significant compromise for a family of four packing for a seaside holiday, usually resulting in the need to purchase a roof box.
| Parameter | Audi A4 Sedan | Volvo S60 Sedan | Audi A4 Estate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base volume (liters) | 460 - 480 | 391 - 442 | 495 |
| Max volume with seats folded down (liters) | 965 | 754 | 1495 |
If a generous and easily accessible trunk is a priority for you in a used car, the Audi A4 (especially in the estate version) clearly beats the managerially-oriented Volvo S60, which additionally loses further precious liters of its original volume in its sophisticated hybrid variants.
Towing capacity and maximum trailer weight are key parameters for drivers who plan to regularly tow a caravan, transport horses, or simply use heavier cargo trailers. Although both the Audi A4 and Volvo S60 represent the popular premium mid-size class, when comparing approximately four-year-old used cars (the third generation of the Volvo and the B9 generation of the Audi), we encounter quite fundamental differences that can significantly influence your final choice.
Looking at the base models, Volvo offers overall more robust starting values. Even with standard engines, such as the petrol or mild-hybrid Volvo S60 B4 and T4 versions, you can tow a braked trailer weighing 1800 kg. The real trump card of the Swedish sedan is the plug-in hybrid T8 Recharge / Twin Engine variants. These not only do not lose towing capacity due to the heavy battery (which is a common ailment in hybrids) but even increase it to a respectable 2000 kg.
In contrast, the Audi A4 (B9 generation) starts with a noticeably lower towing capacity. If you choose weaker engines, such as the petrol 35 TFSI or diesel 30 TDI, the permitted weight of a braked trailer ranges only between 1300 and 1500 kg. This value is sufficient for a weekend trip to a DIY store or a smaller trailer with garden waste, but it may not be enough for a large caravan. The "golden middle" for Audi is the popular 40 TDI versions, which can handle 1700 to 1800 kg. You reach the maximum for the German representative only with the top-of-the-line six-cylinder 50 TDI (or in the Allroad version), which offers 1900 kg.
In practical use, this means that while with the Audi A4 you have to be very careful about which engine you buy in relation to your plans for the tow bar, the Volvo S60 is much more versatile. Even in its base form, the Swedish car provides a huge reserve sufficient for towing a heavy family caravan on a long holiday or trouble-free boat transport. If towing capacity is a priority for you, Volvo is a safer choice across the entire portfolio in terms of numbers.
| Model and motorization | Braked trailer weight (kg) | Unbraked trailer weight (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Audi A4 30 TDI (B9) | 1300 - 1500 | 750 |
| Audi A4 35 TFSI (B9) | 1400 - 1500 | 750 |
| Audi A4 40 TDI (B9) | 1700 - 1800 | 750 |
| Audi A4 50 TDI (B9) | 1900 | 750 |
| Volvo S60 B4 (3rd Gen) | 1800 | 750 |
| Volvo S60 T4 (3rd Gen) | 1800 | 750 |
| Volvo S60 T6 (3rd Gen) | 2000 | 750 |
| Volvo S60 T8 Twin Engine (3rd Gen) | 2000 | 750 |
When choosing a roughly four-year-old premium mid-size car (manufactured around 2022), you will encounter two completely different technical approaches under the hoods of these two rivals. The chosen powertrain can very quickly decide which one better fits your lifestyle. The updated B9 generation Audi A4 remains faithful to a classic and exceptionally wide range, which includes efficient four-cylinder diesels as well as silky-smooth six-cylinder diesels – making it the clear favorite for tireless highway mile-munchers. In contrast, the third-generation Swedish Volvo S60 opted for a drastic revolution. It has consigned traditional diesel engines to history for good, settling only on two-liter petrol engines combined with advanced mild-hybrid or overwhelmingly powerful plug-in hybrid technology. For drivers who cover shorter distances, welcome the possibility of locally emission-free commutes, or enjoy sleeper-like, almost brutal performance off the line, the S60 has an irresistible charm. However, those seeking maximum fuel economy on long-distance intercity trips will undoubtedly reach for the TDI with the four rings on the badge. Most of these four-year-old vehicles from both manufacturers already come standard with fast and precise automatic transmissions from the factory.
Looking at the range of used third-generation Volvo S60s, you will find that the brand has dramatically simplified the engine selection. Power comes exclusively from two-liter four-cylinder petrol engines from the Drive-E family, and manual transmissions have been entirely replaced by the smooth eight-speed Geartronic automatic. Compared to the past, the automaker radically discontinued the production of diesel units, so the legendary D5 five-cylinders or the widely popular D3 and D4 four-cylinders never made it into the current S60 body. After 2020, pure internal combustion variants designated as T4 or T5 also gradually disappeared, with sophisticated 48V mild-hybrids hidden under the "B" designation taking center stage in the four-year-old market. This system effectively recovers energy during braking, smooths out the start-stop functionality, and fills in turbo lag. The standard B4 version offers 145 kW (197 hp), but if you choose the more potent B5 variant (184 kW / 250 hp), you also get the choice between front-wheel drive or all-wheel drive (AWD). The crown jewel for adrenaline seekers and green-plate enthusiasts alike is the T8 Recharge plug-in hybrid. By combining a petrol engine with an electric motor, it achieves a combined output ranging from 288 to 335 kW (over 450 hp in newer models) and offers massive torque along with an electric-only range of approximately 40–50 km.
| Engine type | Fuel type | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B4 | Petrol (Mild-hybrid) | 145 | 300 | 8-speed Geartronic automatic |
| B5 | Petrol (Mild-hybrid) | 184 | 350 | 8-speed Geartronic automatic |
| T8 Recharge | Petrol (Plug-in hybrid) | 288 - 335 | 640 - 709 | 8-speed Geartronic automatic |
Under the skin of the updated B9 generation Audi A4 (models from late 2019 onwards), there is a typically German diversity, dominated by the implementation of minor electrical assistance. Here too, a partial purge took place as part of the facelift – earlier compact units, such as the entry-level 1.4 TFSI petrol engine, are nowhere to be found, having completely disappeared from the younger used car market. The petrol range is now formed only by two-liter engines differentiated by software and technical specs, equipped with a 12V mild-hybrid system: the entry-level 35 TFSI (110 kW), the versatile 40 TFSI (150 kW), and the brisk 45 TFSI (195 kW). However, the true leaders in terms of interest for both corporate and private drivers are clearly the TDI models. Look for the exceptionally reliable and extremely efficient two-liter diesel under the codes 30 TDI (100 kW) and 35 TDI (120 kW). The absolute sweet spot of the used market is the 40 TDI variant with 150 kW (204 hp) and a respectable 400 Nm of torque, very often paired with the preferred intelligent quattro all-wheel drive (AWD). The icing on the cake – and an increasing rarity for six-cylinder lovers today – remains the majestic 3.0 TDI under the 50 TDI badge, where a monstrous, smooth pull of 620 Nm is managed by the eight-speed torque-converter tiptronic. With the exception of this six-cylinder, all main four-cylinder versions are equipped with the lightning-fast seven-speed dual-clutch S tronic transmission. As a highly interesting, albeit rare, alternative for environmentally conscious motorists, Audi also supplied the 40 g-tron version for running on compressed natural gas (CNG) during this era.
| Engine type | Fuel type | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 TFSI (2.0 TFSI) | Petrol (Mild-hybrid) | 110 | 270 | 7-speed S tronic |
| 40 TFSI (2.0 TFSI) | Petrol (Mild-hybrid) | 150 | 320 | 7-speed S tronic |
| 45 TFSI (2.0 TFSI) | Petrol (Mild-hybrid) | 195 | 370 | 7-speed S tronic |
| 30 TDI (2.0 TDI) | Diesel (Mild-hybrid) | 100 | 320 | 7-speed S tronic |
| 35 TDI (2.0 TDI) | Diesel (Mild-hybrid) | 120 | 380 | 7-speed S tronic |
| 40 TDI (2.0 TDI) | Diesel (Mild-hybrid) | 150 | 400 | 7-speed S tronic |
| 50 TDI (3.0 TDI) | Diesel (Mild-hybrid) | 210 | 620 | 8-speed tiptronic |
While the Volvo S60 delights with excellently tuned petrol and plug-in hybrid units ideal for the city and country roads, the Audi A4 is the undisputed winner for drivers who chew through massive highway distances and seek economical diesel engines.
Choosing the right engine is key to long-term satisfaction with the car, and our recommendations are based on real-world experience, fuel consumption, owner feedback, and overall mechanical reliability, taking into account the market offer of approximately four-year-old used cars. While the Audi A4, even in its current generation (B9), maintains a wide range of efficient and powerful diesel engines, Volvo made a very bold move with the third generation of the S60 – it became the brand's first modern car to completely phase out diesel engines and head down the path of electrification. When choosing the Swedish representative, you choose exclusively between petrol mild-hybrids and plug-in hybrids, while the German competitor still satisfies highway travelers seeking a reliable range of over a thousand kilometers on a single tank.
This engine (available for cars from 2020–2023) represents the absolute ideal on the used car market, combining great dynamics with low operating costs. The two-liter turbodiesel from the reliable EA288 Evo family is standardly equipped with 12V mild-hybrid technology, which smoothes out the reactions of the start-stop system and brings exceptionally smooth operation.
Given the absence of diesel units, we recommend reaching for the happy medium in the form of the B4 mild-hybrid version (replacing the older generation T4 engine), which has been produced since roughly 2020. It is an exceptionally advanced design that harmonizes with the relaxed character of the Scandinavian sedan.
The difference between the official fuel consumption figures provided by manufacturers and real-world values in everyday driving is often vast. To get the most accurate picture of how much fuel these models actually require, we looked at real-world data directly from drivers. We draw from community platforms such as the popular Spritmonitor.de, where owners record their refueling and actual mileage over the long term. For comparison, we selected approximately four-year-old used cars, which in the case of the Audi A4 means the B9 generation (after the facelift) and for the Volvo S60, the current third generation.
| Model and Engine | Average Consumption (l/100 km) |
|---|---|
| Diesel engines | |
| Audi A4 35 TDI (120 kW) | 5.6 |
| Audi A4 40 TDI (140 kW) | 6.1 |
| Petrol engines and mild hybrids | |
| Audi A4 35 TFSI (110 kW) | 6.9 |
| Audi A4 40 TFSI (150 kW) | 7.3 |
| Volvo S60 B4 (145 kW) | 7.8 |
| Volvo S60 T4 (140 kW) | 8.0 |
| Volvo S60 B5 (184 kW) | 8.2 |
| Plug-in hybrids | |
| Volvo S60 T8 PHEV (288 kW) | 4.5 |
Interesting trends clearly emerge from the data. Traditional diesel engines in the Audi A4 (TDI) remain the unbeatable choice for long-distance highway drivers – the less powerful but still sufficiently potent 35 TDI version can achieve long-term consumption well below the six-liter mark. Audi's TFSI petrol units also stay within very reasonable limits, showing that modern turbocharged four-cylinders can be unexpectedly efficient.
In contrast, the Volvo S60, which radically eliminated diesel engines for this model in its third generation, shows a noticeably higher appetite in its petrol and mild-hybrid versions (B4 and B5). The assistance of a small electric motor cannot miraculously slash highway consumption, and in real-world driving, you will most often find yourself around eight liters with this Swedish sedan. The top-of-the-line Volvo S60 T8 plug-in hybrid version is a chapter of its own; while its average on paper and in an ideal scenario oscillates around 4.5 l/100 km, this is strictly conditional on diligent charging from the grid. As soon as you drive a longer route with a discharged battery, consumption quickly matches that of conventional powerful petrol engines.
For buyers, a crucial recommendation follows from this comparison. If you commute long distances daily, often travel across the country on the highway, or simply look to minimize fuel costs as much as possible, a diesel Audi A4 will be a much more sensible choice for you. Conversely, the Volvo S60 will appeal more to drivers with lower annual mileage or users who have easy access to a charger at home or work and can thus fully exploit the potential of the T8 model. Due to the complete absence of diesels in the modern Volvo S60, overall real-world consumption is one of the key and decisive factors in this premium battle.
When looking for roughly four-year-old used cars (2021 and 2022 models), you will encounter a diametrically different market reality for both models. While the Audi A4 benefits from a massive presence in corporate fleets, the Volvo S60 represents a much rarer and more specialized choice on the used car market.
| Model (2021–2022 models) | Starting price (mileage approx. 150,000 km) | Most common price (the sweet spot) | Top-tier versions (S line / Recharge) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi A4 (generation B9.5) | from €19,000 | €23,000 – €27,000 | €29,000 – €35,000 |
| Volvo S60 (3rd generation) | from €21,000 | €27,000 – €31,000 | €35,000 – €41,000 |
The German representative benefits from a huge number of returned vehicles from large corporate fleets and operational leases. A strong oversupply over demand creates natural price pressure, giving used car buyers a great negotiating position.
The third generation of the Volvo S60 offers a completely different approach on the used car market. The carmaker sells this specific model exclusively as a classic sedan (the estate is labeled V60), making it a less common sight in used car dealerships.
The Audi A4 experiences a slightly sharper loss of value in the early stages precisely due to a market oversaturated with company cars. Once the car passes the 100,000-kilometer mark, the price drop curve slows down significantly.
The Volvo S60 benefits from its position as a premium alternative. Depreciation here is more linear; models hold their value well, but when buying top-of-the-line plug-in hybrid used cars (Recharge), it is appropriate to factor in possible future maintenance associated with a more complex powertrain system and an aging battery. For drivers who cover long motorway distances, the missing diesel in the Volvo may represent slightly higher daily fuel bills compared to Audi's proven TDI engines.
If you are looking for the best price-to-utility ratio combined with low motorway mileage costs, a used Audi A4 TDI from fleet offers is unbeatable; however, if you require rich luxury equipment as standard and representative performance, paying extra for a Volvo S60 is definitely worth it.
Both models, the Audi A4 and the Volvo S60, received the maximum five-star rating in their primary Euro NCAP safety tests. When buying a used car, however, it is crucial to put these results into the correct context and take into account the year the tests were conducted. Euro NCAP assessment protocols are constantly evolving and becoming stricter over time, meaning that percentage scores from different years cannot be directly compared. Newer tests place disproportionately more emphasis on advanced assistance systems, the protection of vulnerable road users (cyclists and pedestrians), and complex crisis scenarios at intersections.
Audi A4 generation B9 underwent Euro NCAP crash tests as early as 2015. For its time, the car demonstrated an exceptionally high level of passive safety, which was reflected in excellent ratings for adult protection (89%) and child protection (87%). However, since the testing was conducted according to older and less demanding standards, the validity of this five-star certificate formally expired at the beginning of 2022. From today's perspective, this does not mean that the Audi A4 is dangerous; however, its factory rating for safety assistants and active pedestrian protection no longer fully reflects the latest and much stricter requirements of the current market.
Volvo S60, on the other hand, underwent testing in 2018 (the results were taken from the test of its sister estate, the V60, due to identical construction). In that year, a significantly stricter testing methodology was already in place. Volvo confirmed its historical reputation as a safety benchmark with a stunning result of 96% in adult occupant protection. Because the S60 shares the robust SPA architecture with larger models and utilizes the advanced City Safety active safety package, it already featured a standard system with pedestrian, cyclist, and large animal detection, as well as an automatic braking function at intersections.
Although both vehicles offer highly above-average protection in terms of passive safety, the Volvo S60 emerges from this comparison as the more modern and overall more comprehensive choice. This is due not only to the more recent testing date and the resulting success in more demanding criteria but also to the standard integration of active assistants that can reliably prevent a wider range of accidents in everyday traffic.
| Parameter | Audi A4 | Volvo S60 |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | 2015 | 2018 |
| Adult occupant protection | 89 % | 96 % |
| Child occupant protection | 87 % | 84 % |
| Vulnerable road user protection | 75 % | 74 % |
| Safety assist systems | 75 % | 76 % |
Although both cars offer a solid and safe construction, the Volvo S60, thanks to its more recent rating and highly advanced assistance systems, provides used car buyers with a more confident choice that much better meets today's strict safety standards.
In addition to standard equipment, both models offer much more than just basic features for daily commutes, with each having its own distinctive approach to added value.
Top-tier interior build quality and premium materials
Excellent digital instrument cluster (Virtual Cockpit) with a very intuitive interface
Wide range of reliable powertrains, including the popular TDI diesel engines
Excellent traction and driving stability thanks to the available quattro all-wheel drive
Very good residual value on the used car market
Significantly conservative design that changes only minimally between generations and even after facelifts
Less legroom for rear passengers compared to other mid-size cars
Noticeably stiffer suspension tuning on versions with the S line package or larger wheels
Audi A4 represents a long-standing benchmark in terms of craftsmanship and driving confidence, making it the perfect car for frequent motorway travel. It will primarily appeal to more conservative drivers who appreciate advanced technology, precise ergonomics, and a wide selection of classic internal combustion engines.
Very attractive and timeless Scandinavian design that sets the car apart from German competitors
Unrivalled ergonomics and front seat comfort, ideal for long-distance travel
Absolute leader in active safety assistants and body robustness
Great driving performance in plug-in hybrid versions (Recharge) with the option of pure electric range
Smaller volume and poorer overall accessibility of the luggage compartment (produced exclusively as a sedan)
Complete absence of fuel-efficient diesel engines in the third-generation lineup
Factory-imposed top speed limit of 180 km/h (applicable to all models from 2020 onwards)
Excessive concentration of controls in the central touchscreen, including climate settings
The Volvo S60 is a great choice for individualists who want to break away from the traditional German premium brands and are looking for a safe, immensely comfortable, and stylish sedan. The absence of diesels and a clear focus on petrol and hybrid technologies make it more suitable for calmer drivers who prefer a relaxing atmosphere and a sustainable approach.
Based on long-term breakdown statistics, service bulletins, and data from our comprehensive CarAudit vehicle inspections, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems you should watch out for in roughly four-year-old used examples of these models.
The Audi A4 generation B9 (including the facelifted B9.5 version from 2019) is among the above-average reliable cars in its class; however, there are still typical weak points that require proper attention when choosing a used car.
The Audi A4 generation B9 is among the more reliable choices among premium cars. However, its trouble-free operation stands and falls with the meticulous servicing of the complex transmission and timely intervention against minor coolant leaks.
The third generation of the Volvo S60 is built on the advanced SPA platform, which, while providing top-tier levels of safety and rigidity, also hides relatively complicated technology that can significantly strain your wallet after the factory warranty expires.
The Volvo S60 is a structurally robust car, but in older model years, you should be very careful about the risky initial versions of the plug-in hybrid system and generally expect much faster brake wear.
When buying a used car, a thorough physical inspection of the used vehicle is key. Here are a few specific points you should focus on for these two models.
The Audi A4 sedan offers a luggage capacity of 460 liters, which is slightly more than the 442 liters of the Volvo S60. Both cars have a regularly shaped trunk, but if you need to transport bulkier items, the German representative is slightly more practical. On the other hand, the third-generation Volvo scores with more luxurious upholstery and better lighting throughout the cargo area.
For a more dynamic driving experience, the Audi A4 is clearly the better choice, especially if equipped with quattro all-wheel drive and adaptive suspension. The Volvo S60, by contrast, focuses primarily on a calm, exceptionally comfortable ride and perfect isolation of the occupants from outside noise. The steering in the Swedish car is more over-assisted and does not provide as much feedback as the more precise system in the Audi.
A major difference in the used car market is the fact that the current generation of the Volvo S60 has completely abandoned diesel engines and offers exclusively gasoline or plug-in hybrid units. The Audi A4, on the other hand, has kept very efficient and popular TDI diesel engines in its lineup, which are ideal for long highway journeys. So, if you are looking for an efficient diesel for high mileage, the Audi is the only possible choice in this comparison.
Since both are premium vehicles, it is necessary to expect generally higher prices for spare parts and hourly service rates. For the Audi, watch out for the need for timely oil changes in the S tronic automatic transmissions, while the Volvo occasionally experienced infotainment software bugs in the early years of the third generation. As roughly four-year-old used cars, however, both models are above-average reliable if they have a documented and regular service history.
Both manufacturers represent the absolute pinnacle of safety and have earned the maximum five stars in the rigorous Euro NCAP crash tests. However, the Volvo S60 traditionally excels even in its base trim, which includes an advanced collision prevention system with detection of pedestrians, cyclists, and large animals. The Audi A4 offers fully comparable technology and assistants, but the first owner of the car had to pay extra for many of them.
Sources: ADAC, garaz.cz, denik.cz, dopravniinfo.cz, autorevue.cz, ceskyautoblog.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Detailed comparison of Honda Accord vs. Škoda Superb. Discover real-world experiences, equipment and driving characteristics comparisons, and read the verdict for the best choice.
Apr 21, 2026

Peugeot 508 vs. Škoda Superb: Detailed comparison, real-world experiences, and the verdict to help you choose the best executive car.
Apr 13, 2026

Alfa Romeo Giulia vs Mercedes-Benz C-Class comparison. We compared driving characteristics, engines, and equipment. Find out in our verdict which used sedan to choose.
Apr 19, 2026