
BMW iX3 vs. Jaguar I-Pace: Complete comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of the BMW iX3 vs Jaguar I-Pace. Discover the differences in range, equipment, and driving experience. Read our verdict and choose the best premium electric SUV.
Apr 23, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Comparison: Audi Q8 e-tron vs. Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV. Find out the real range, compare the equipment, and read our clear verdict. Which electric SUV to choose?
May 10, 2026


The Audi Q8 e-tron, formerly known on the market simply as the Audi e-tron, represents a seasoned pioneer of luxury electromobility that bets on majestic comfort and an elegant design familiar to fans of the brand's traditional internal combustion models. Standing against it is the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, a technology-packed premium model that brings top-tier aerodynamics and a strictly futuristic, innovative interior to this segment. In the following comparison, we will take a detailed look at which of these two prestigious German electric SUVs offers a better combination of range, driving characteristics, and overall utility value.
When looking at the external dimensions of these premium electric SUVs, the different approach of both carmakers to body proportions is striking. The Audi Q8 e-tron (in its updated GE generation) is, with its total length of 4915 mm, up to 52 mm longer than the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (generation 294), whose length ranges from 4863 to 4879 mm depending on the version. The width of both cars is very similar; Audi offers 1937 to 1994 mm, while Mercedes has a standard value of 1940 mm. The greater overall length gives the Ingolstadt model a slightly more majestic appearance of a traditional large SUV, but in narrow city streets and during parallel parking, the more compact footprint of the Mercedes will be a slight advantage. In terms of daily maneuverability and city parking, the EQE SUV may thus seem like a slightly more practical and driver-friendly choice.
A fundamental difference lies in the wheelbase values, where the advantage of Mercedes' purely electric platform over Audi's redesigned foundations is fully evident. Although the EQE SUV is shorter overall, its wheelbase is an impressive 3030 mm. The competing Q8 e-tron counters with a value of only 2923 to 2928 mm. This represents a massive difference of about 100 mm in favor of the Stuttgart model. This design detail means that Mercedes was able to push the wheels further into the corners of the body, which in practice translates into significantly more generous longitudinal space for passengers, especially in the rear seats. If your main priority is maximum interior space and comfort for adult passengers in the back, Mercedes-Benz clearly dominates in this discipline thanks to its long wheelbase and represents the better choice.
An interesting comparison is also provided by looking at the overall height of the vehicles. The Audi Q8 e-tron offers slightly more variability on the used car market, especially thanks to the availability of the sportier Sportback version, where the height is reduced to 1619 mm (standard SUV versions reach up to 1683 mm). The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV sticks to a more traditional and uniform build with a height between 1669 and 1685 mm. The lower silhouette of the Audi not only benefits a more dynamic visual impression but also plays a role in aerodynamics, which can theoretically help efficiency at highway speeds. On the other hand, the slightly taller and more upright build of the Mercedes makes entry easier and ensures the popular upright position with an excellent view. For those looking for a more elegant look and a lower profile, the Audi Q8 e-tron is the more attractive choice, while the EQE SUV targets fans of classic SUV airiness and more comfortable cabin access.
| Parameter | Audi Q8 e-tron SUV | Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 4915 | 4863 - 4879 |
| Width (mm) | 1937 - 1994 | 1940 |
| Height (mm) | 1619 - 1683 | 1669 - 1685 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2923 - 2928 | 3030 |
When choosing a premium electric SUV, practicality and trunk capacity play a key role. Whether you're planning a family holiday, a weekend getaway into nature with plenty of gear, or just need enough space for a large grocery shop, extra liters can make a big difference. Both the Audi Q8 e-tron and the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV bring generous space to the used car market, but each benefits from a slightly different body architecture and interior packaging.
Audi Q8 e-tron impresses in its standard body style (SUV) with a very solid base trunk capacity of 569 liters. This is a value fully sufficient for family travel, where you can easily fit suitcases and a stroller. After fully folding the rear seats, the space increases to 1,637 liters. If you are attracted to the more aerodynamic and stylish Q8 Sportback e-tron variant with its sloping roofline, you must expect a slight penalty for the design. The base trunk capacity of the Sportback version drops to 528 liters, and the total maximum cargo capacity after folding the seats is 1,567 liters.
The competing Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV offers a capacity of 520 liters in its basic five-seat configuration, placing it just below the classic Audi Q8 e-tron and on par with its Sportback version. However, the situation completely reverses when you need to transport bulkier cargo and fold the rear seats. At that point, the Mercedes reveals its perfect use of the platform and offers a maximum capacity of 1,675 liters. Thus, in its maximum configuration, the EQE SUV surpasses both Audi versions and provides users with space for several extra suitcases, which is excellent for moving house or transporting larger sports equipment.
| Parameter | Audi Q8 e-tron SUV | Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron SUV | Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV |
|---|---|---|---|
| Base capacity (liters) | 569 | 528 | 520 |
| Maximum capacity with seats folded (liters) | 1637 | 1567 | 1675 |
While the Audi Q8 e-tron with its classic body style holds more luggage in its base configuration and facilitates everyday travel, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV excels in modularity and carries by far the largest load after the seats are folded.
Towing capacity is often a key factor for premium electric SUVs, especially if you are looking for a versatile family car. In practice, the trailer weight determines whether you can safely hitch up only a small garden waste trailer or if you have enough capacity for a large caravan or horsebox.
When comparing models from 2023 to 2025, which are the most relevant on the nearly-new used car market, the Audi Q8 e-tron offers complete peace of mind. Regardless of which performance version you choose (50 or 55) or if you opt for the more aerodynamic Sportback body, the maximum braked towing capacity is always fixed at 1800 kg. With this model, you don't have to deal with any compromises across the range.
Conversely, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (generation 294) shows quite significant differences depending on the chosen motorization. Standard base variants, such as the 300 and 350+ versions (typically with rear-wheel drive to achieve maximum range), have a braked towing capacity limited to only 750 kg. To reach the maximum value of 1800 kg, which matches the rival Audi, you must look for more powerful all-wheel-drive versions of the Mercedes – specifically the 350, 500, or the sporty AMG versions (43 and 53).
The difference between 750 kg and 1800 kg has major practical implications. While the 750 kg limit on the base EQE SUV serves as space for a few extra suitcases or is sufficient for a weekend purchase of bulky material on an unbraked trailer, the 1800 kg towing capacity of the Audi and the more powerful Mercedes models will reliably serve you even for a long family holiday with a full-sized caravan.
In summary, the Audi Q8 e-tron represents a more universal and safer choice if you are buying a used car and require solid towing power regardless of the trim level. While the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV offers identical maximum parameters, choosing one on the used market requires much more careful checking of the selected drivetrain to avoid an unpleasant surprise.
| Model and engine | Braked towing capacity (kg) | Unbraked towing capacity (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Audi Q8 e-tron 50 | 1800 | 750 |
| Audi Q8 e-tron 55 | 1800 | 750 |
| Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron (50, 55) | 1800 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 300 | 750 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350+ | 750 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 | 1800 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 500 | 1800 | 750 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 43 / 53 AMG | 1800 | 750 |
When choosing a premium electric SUV, the powertrain plays a major role – it doesn't just dictate dynamics, but directly determines real-world range and overall efficiency. In the comparison between the Audi Q8 e-tron and the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV, we encounter two completely different philosophical approaches to the electric platform. With the Q8 e-tron, Audi bets on certainty and robustness, providing two electric motors, massive torque, and quattro permanent all-wheel drive as standard for all its standard powertrains. Interestingly, thanks to this strategy, both of its available versions have an identical torque of 664 Nm and differ only in maximum power. Conversely, Mercedes has cast a much wider net with its dedicated EQE SUV. It provides purist single-motor versions focused on the lowest possible consumption and maximum range (which will be especially appreciated by long-distance highway drivers), but at the same time, it doesn't hesitate to offer extreme dual-motor derivatives from the AMG division with staggering power that far exceeds Audi's top standard offering.
The iconic fully electric Audi Q8 e-tron (GE generation) offers a straightforward and clear approach, where the drivetrain is uncompromisingly focused on traction and stability. Both of its standard specifications are equipped with quattro all-wheel drive as standard thanks to two built-in electric motors. The entry-level Q8 e-tron 50 provides a very solid 250 kW (340 hp), which is a respectable value for a base model. Its more powerful sibling, the Q8 e-tron 55, adds extra power with its 300 kW (408 hp). Although the power output differs, both powertrains share the same and immensely strong torque of 664 Nm. When choosing on the used car market, however, it is absolutely crucial to take into account the fact that, according to availability databases, production of these specific powertrains (50 and 55) for the Q8 e-tron model ended in February 2025. Today, you can find these electric variants primarily in the selection of nearly new, approximately 1 to 4-year-old used cars, where they represent an excellent purchase given their premium quality.
| Engine type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 50 quattro | Electric | 250 | 664 | 1-speed auto |
| 55 quattro | Electric | 300 | 664 | 1-speed auto |
On the opposite side of the spectrum stands the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV (generation 294), which utilizes its pure electric architecture to provide maximum variability. If your priority is absolute range, the single-motor rear-wheel drive (RWD) models 300 (180 kW) and 350+ (215 kW) represent the peak of highway efficiency in the entire portfolio. For drivers who require traction on both axles, there is the 350 4MATIC version (which has the same 215 kW output but adds an enormous 765 Nm of torque) and the 500 4MATIC model, which shares the same 300 kW output as the more powerful Audi. Real ferocity, however, begins with the AMG sports division. It should be noted that the high-performance 43 AMG 4MATIC (350 kW) variant was withdrawn from sale and production in April 2025, making it an increasingly rare used car. The role of the ultimate performance peak is then confidently held by the 53 AMG 4MATIC+ powertrain, producing a brutal 460 kW.
| Engine type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | Electric | 180 | 550 | 1-speed auto |
| 350+ | Electric | 215 | 565 | 1-speed auto |
| 350 4MATIC | Electric | 215 | 765 | 1-speed auto |
| 500 4MATIC | Electric | 300 | 858 | 1-speed auto |
| 43 AMG 4MATIC | Electric | 350 | 858 | 1-speed auto |
| 53 AMG 4MATIC+ | Electric | 460 | 950 | 1-speed auto |
The comparison of these two electric giants clearly shows the strengths and weaknesses of both strategies. The main advantage of the Audi Q8 e-tron is the absolute confidence of its foundation – you can't go wrong even with the base model, as you immediately get a top-tier 664 Nm of torque and reliable all-wheel drive. The only disadvantage is the narrow model range, which completely lacks "lightweight" single-axle drive versions for maximum range. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV lineup excels precisely in targeting the customer accurately. RWD models are champions of efficiency across highways, although the lack of front-axle drive might be an unforgivable compromise on winter roads for some in such a heavy and expensive SUV.
For families and drivers looking for traction and everyday safety, the robust (though no longer available as new) Audi Q8 e-tron 50 can be warmly recommended as a reliable four-year "partner". Conversely, for economically minded long-distance drivers, the Stuttgart-based EQE SUV 350+ will serve best, while fans of spirited driving and dream-like acceleration have no choice but to go for the AMG versions – in this performance territory, Audi offered no competition within this specific car family.
While the Audi Q8 e-tron charms in the used car market with confident all-wheel drive in every version sold, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV wins on flexibility thanks to its range of efficient RWD models and uncompromising rockets from the AMG division.
Choosing the right powertrain is essential for these premium electric SUVs for long-term satisfaction, as the massive curb weight exceeding 2.5 tons places extreme demands on both powertrain efficiency and real-world battery capacity. While the Audi Q8 e-tron represents a solid evolution of the first e-tron with improved battery chemistry and relies on the robust MLB Evo group platform, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV is built on the fully dedicated EVA2 pure electric architecture. In the Mercedes, this manifests, among other things, in top-tier aerodynamic drag and a cleverly designed interior space. Our recommendations for an ideal used car roughly three to four years old are based on a balanced ratio of highway range, mechanical reliability, and everyday user comfort.
| Model | Recommended powertrain | Power | Usable battery | Market availability |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Audi Q8 e-tron | 55 quattro | 300 kW | 106 kWh | 2023 – present |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV | 350 4MATIC | 215 kW | 89 kWh | 2023 – present |
Note on availability: As shown by historical production data, both of our recommended fully electric versions were launched in 2023 and have been available without interruption since then. If you come across older internal combustion plug-in hybrids (e.g., Q8 55 TFSI e) in advertisements within the "Q8" family, check the model year – these models had a production hiatus and were completely absent from the new car market during 2023.
The 55 quattro version is by far the best choice in Audi's electric lineup because, unlike the base 50 version, it features a massive battery with a usable capacity of 106 kWh (vs. 89 kWh). This difference is key. The car's enormous weight simply requires a substantial energy reserve for the vehicle to confidently handle a real-world highway range of around 350 to 400 km without stress. You get an exceptionally calm cruiser whose two electric motors with 664 Nm of torque offer fantastically smooth acceleration in every situation.
In the diverse range (starting with the base rear-wheel-drive 300 and ending with the devastatingly fast but expensive 500 or AMG models), the 350 4MATIC is the most rational middle ground. Although the 215 kW (292 hp) output may seem more modest on paper compared to the Audi, it lacks nothing in terms of lightning-fast response, and thanks to the efficient distribution of the massive 765 Nm torque, you won't feel a lack of dynamics even when the car is fully loaded.
When evaluating both electric SUVs, it is necessary to keep in mind that real energy consumption can differ significantly from the official, laboratory-measured WLTP cycle values. To achieve the most objective comparison possible, we therefore base our findings on the real experiences of owners shared on the Spritmonitor.de platform and on independent user tests, where drivers record their long-term data from daily operation. This methodology provides us with an accurate picture of the actual energy requirements of both models, which you would find on the market as approximately four-year-old used cars.
| Model and engine version | Average consumption (kWh/100 km) |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350+ | 18.2 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 300 | 18.6 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 500 4MATIC | 19.0 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 350 4MATIC | 19.1 |
| Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 50 | 20.3 |
| Audi Q8 Sportback e-tron 55 | 20.7 |
| Audi Q8 e-tron 50 | 20.9 |
| Audi Q8 e-tron 55 | 22.8 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 43 AMG | 23.2 |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV 53 AMG | 23.2 |
The interpretation of the data shows a relatively clear trend. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV emerges from the comparison as a significantly more efficient electric car, thanks primarily to its sophisticated body aerodynamics and advanced architecture designed purely for electric drive. The most economical variant is the 350+ version with rear-wheel drive; however, even the more powerful all-wheel-drive versions (EQE 350 and 500) average around a very respectable 19 kWh/100 km. In contrast, the Audi Q8 e-tron, which uses a modified platform (GE generation) sharing some elements with internal combustion engine vehicles, shows significantly higher consumption. The basic 50 versions are safely above 20 kWh, and for the more powerful 55 version in the classic SUV body style, the average real consumption rises to nearly 23 kWh/100 km. At the same time, measurements clearly confirm that the smoothly sloping roof of the more aerodynamic Sportback version can actually save several tenths of a kilowatt-hour for every hundred kilometers in the Audi.
For the average user, these differences have a tangible impact on daily life with the car, especially on long journeys. For those who regularly cover many highway miles, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV will be a substantially more comfortable choice due to its lower energy requirements. The vehicle can squeeze a longer real-world range out of the battery, which ultimately means fewer forced stops at fast-charging stations. While the Audi Q8 e-tron tries to mask its appetite with a huge battery capacity (especially in the 55 variant), which is sufficient for a very decent range, the higher electricity consumption inevitably translates into more expensive operation and higher charging bills.
In conclusion, if overall operating efficiency and energy consumption economy are key factors for you, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV clearly has the upper hand over its rival from Ingolstadt in this regard. Although the Audi Q8 e-tron scores with top-tier travel comfort and luxurious craftsmanship, from a pragmatic point of view regarding consumption, the representative with the three-pointed star emerges as the winner of this electric duel.
Looking at the used car market roughly three to four years after their introduction (2022–2023 models), it is clear that both premium electric SUVs have seen a significant drop from their original list prices. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV and Audi Q8 e-tron (which replaced the original e-tron name in 2023) today represent an attractive entry point into the world of luxury electromobility on the secondary market, albeit with slightly different price curves.
| Model | Starting Price (high mileage) | The Golden Mean (optimal equipment) | Top-tier Versions (AMG / SQ8) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi Q8 e-tron | from €45,000 | €55,000 – €66,000 | €74,000 and more |
| Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV | from €49,000 | €58,000 – €70,000 | €78,000 and more |
The Audi Q8 e-tron benefits from the fact that it is a deep facelift of the original and very popular e-tron model. Thanks to a wide base and an overall higher supply on the European used car market, it has become a slightly more affordable choice.
Mercedes-Benz maintains a slightly higher average market value. This is partly due to it being a structurally newer model built from the ground up on a purely electric platform (EVA2), and also thanks to the often extremely expensive optional equipment that the first owners invested in.
From the perspective of total value loss, both vehicles represent a rational choice. After the initial massive drop from list prices, the secondary market offers generous electric vehicles for a fraction of the original amount. Audi leads in pure affordability for more powerful versions, while Mercedes-Benz benefits from its reputation as a technological leader, which is reflected in its more confident price tags.
While the Audi Q8 e-tron scores with a slightly more attractive price for desirable trim levels and a longer range for the mid-range version at a favorable price, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV holds its value slightly better thanks to its purely electric platform and top-tier technological equipment.
Both of these premium electric vehicles earned the maximum five-star rating in independent Euro NCAP crash tests. However, when choosing a used car, it is crucial to put this score into the correct context. The methodology and requirements of the tests are constantly becoming more stringent over the years, so percentage results from different testing periods are not directly comparable. Newer protocols place much greater emphasis on precise assistance systems, protection of vulnerable road users, and sophisticated scenarios, such as autonomous braking in the event of a potential collision with a cyclist at an intersection.
In terms of safety, the Audi Q8 e-tron benefits from the highly durable construction of the original e-tron model, from which it inherited its five-star certification obtained back in 2019. Although the tests were conducted according to older and less stringent standards, the car offers excellent structural rigidity, which is reflected in an outstanding 91% for adult occupant protection. However, in the areas of pedestrian protection (71%) and safety assistants (76%), the scores logically reflect the technological level of previous years. Although the Q8 e-tron is a very safe car, its rating simply does not include today's most modern and toughest certification scenarios.
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV underwent Euro NCAP tests in 2023, i.e., according to one of the strictest current methodologies. Despite high demands including new types of frontal barriers, the car excelled. It earned an impressive 90% in child occupant protection and 85% for its advanced assistance systems. A slightly lower percentage for adult protection (87%) was, according to the test assessors, caused by a minor penalty for the performance of the center airbag for occupants of different body proportions. In all other respects, however, the Mercedes demonstrated that it possesses a top-tier and modern safety arsenal.
| Parameter | Audi Q8 e-tron | Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | 2019 | 2023 |
| Adult protection | 91% | 87% |
| Child protection | 85% | 90% |
| Vulnerable road user protection | 71% | 80% |
| Assistance systems | 76% | 85% |
Final evaluation
While the Audi Q8 e-tron represents a solidly built and immensely robust vehicle that met the requirements perfectly in its time, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV is a step forward thanks to its more recent testing date. It meets the more complex requirements of today's market and, from the perspective of modern active safety technologies, represents a slightly more advanced choice for buyers in the used car market.
Both cars guarantee a five-star level of safety, but the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV was tested under a significantly stricter methodology in 2023, giving it a tangible lead in the quality and range of active assistants.
Both premium electric SUVs offer much more than just basic equipment, with each brand taking its own, very distinctive approach to added value, comfort, and technological innovation.
Audi relies on a combination of traditional luxury and futuristic elements for its flagship electric SUV, which actively improve the efficiency and safety of everyday driving.
Mercedes-Benz benefits from the advantage of a dedicated all-electric platform (EVA2) and brings technologies to the segment focused on maximum visual experience, spatial comfort, and unrivaled maneuverability.
Excellent ride comfort on long journeys thanks to the standard air suspension
Top-tier cabin soundproofing, making it one of the quietest cars in its class
More traditional and logical interior ergonomics with some physical buttons retained
Very flat fast-charging curve that maintains maximum power for a long time
Larger base luggage capacity (569 liters) and a more practical rear shape
Higher electricity consumption due to the use of a modified platform originally for internal combustion vehicles (MLB evo)
High curb weight (over 2.5 tons) impairing agility and handling in corners
The onboard system and infotainment graphics look slightly dated compared to more modern competitors
The Audi Q8 e-tron is an ideal choice for drivers looking for maximum comfort, precise craftsmanship, and a more conservative design that doesn't scream "electric car" at first glance. It is perfectly suited for long highway trips, where the occupants will appreciate the fantastic soundproofing and reliable charging speed without significant power drops.
Dedicated electric platform (EVA2) ensuring excellent overall efficiency and space utilization
Great aerodynamics and lower average energy consumption, resulting in a longer real-world range
Top-tier technology led by the MBUX system and the optional Hyperscreen dashboard
Stunning maneuverability in urban environments thanks to available rear-axle steering (up to 10 degrees)
Specific rounded body design, which is less majestic in terms of proportions and may not suit everyone
Ambiguous and artificial brake pedal feel during the transition between recuperation and mechanical brakes
Slightly smaller luggage compartment (520 liters) compared to the Q8 e-tron
Less headroom in the rear seats due to the significantly sloping roofline for aerodynamics
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV will appeal to tech enthusiasts and buyers who prefer the longest possible range supported by top efficiency and modern electric architecture. It is a perfect choice for those looking for futuristic luxury inside the cabin and unrivaled agility in narrow streets, albeit at the cost of slight compromises in trunk space.
Based on experience from long-term testing, fault statistics, user reports, and practical results, including a comprehensive car inspection, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems that buyers of both used electric vehicles should watch out for.
For the Audi Q8 e-tron (and its immediate predecessor, the e-tron), most common problems relate to software imperfections and the vehicle's massive weight; however, it has not escaped more critical recalls focused on the braking system.
A well-built SUV with above-average reliability of high-voltage batteries, but with a risk of expensive brake repairs and frequent software ailments. A documented service history, including resolved recalls, is an absolutely essential condition for purchase.
Mercedes' electric SUV faced several significant "teething problems" in its first years of production, with recalls for electrical wiring and control software requiring the most attention for used cars.
An exceptionally comfortable car whose early production was marked by several serious software and electrical issues. However, once it has all safety repairs documented and applied, it becomes a reliable highway cruiser where you mainly need to watch out for rapidly disappearing tires.
When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key. Here are some specific points to focus on for these two models, while the ideal assurance is always an independent used car inspection by a professional.
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV is overall more aerodynamic and energy-efficient, which ensures a slightly longer range in real-world driving. Although the Audi Q8 e-tron offers a battery with a larger capacity in its top versions, this compensates for its higher overall energy consumption. Depending on the chosen motorization, however, both luxury SUVs can cover over 500 kilometers on a single charge according to the WLTP standard.
The Audi Q8 e-tron wins in terms of overall practicality with a main trunk volume of 569 liters and adds a handy 62-liter front trunk (frunk), ideal for storing charging cables. The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has a slightly smaller luggage compartment with a capacity of 520 liters. The front storage space is completely missing in the Mercedes because the hood is permanently closed from the factory and can only be opened by a service center.
Both premium vehicles support DC fast charging with a maximum power of up to 170 kW in top specifications. Audi boasts an excellent and flatter charging curve, thanks to which it maintains maximum power for a much longer time. In practice, you will spend a similar amount of time at a fast charger with both models when charging from 10 to 80%, around 30 minutes.
The Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV has a significant advantage in the city thanks to the optional rear-axle steering system of up to 10 degrees. This innovative feature significantly reduces the turning radius to the level of compact hatchbacks, making parallel parking and turning easier. Audi, on the other hand, is more of a traditional, bulky SUV that can feel a bit more cumbersome in narrow multi-story parking garages.
Mercedes impresses with a futuristic and extravagant concept, especially if equipped with the massive MBUX Hyperscreen, which seamlessly covers the entire width of the dashboard. Audi, on the other hand, bets on the evolution of its traditional design with two central touchscreens and emphasizes absolutely precise and conservative craftsmanship. While Mercedes will thrill fans of the latest gadgets, Audi will appeal to drivers who prefer elegant and proven ergonomics.
Choosing between the Audi Q8 e-tron and the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV represents a choice between honest traditional luxury and advanced electric architecture. The Audi Q8 e-tron scores with majestic comfort, top-tier soundproofing, and everyday versatility thanks to a larger luggage compartment and standard high towing capacity, making it an ideal highway cruiser for families and more conservative drivers. In contrast, the Mercedes-Benz EQE SUV fully benefits from a dedicated platform, which brings excellent aerodynamics, more efficient operation with a longer real-world range, and, thanks to active rear-axle steering, also unprecedented agility in tight city traffic. If you are looking for the uncompromising comfort of a classic large SUV with the robustness and confidence of all-wheel drive, go for the Audi, while tech enthusiasts requiring maximum efficiency and a futuristic interior will find their perfect companion in the Stuttgart model.
Sources: ADAC, forbes.cz, e15.cz, hybrid.cz, emobility.cz, autosport.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Detailed comparison of the BMW iX3 vs Jaguar I-Pace. Discover the differences in range, equipment, and driving experience. Read our verdict and choose the best premium electric SUV.
Apr 23, 2026

Detailed comparison of the Škoda Enyaq iV vs. Volkswagen (VW) ID.4. Discover the real differences in range, equipment, and reliability, and choose the right electric SUV for you.
Apr 27, 2026

Detailed comparison of the Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo XC40 Recharge. Which premium electric SUV has better range and real-world consumption? Read our clear verdict.
Apr 22, 2026