
Nissan Juke vs. Opel Mokka: A Complete Comparison for 2025
Nissan Juke vs Opel Mokka: A detailed comparison of design, ride, and features. Our verdict will help you choose the right compact crossover.
Apr 14, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Citroën C3 Aircross vs Peugeot 2008 comparison. Find out which used SUV better suits your needs. We bring you a comparison of engines, equipment, and the final verdict.
April 19, 2026


The French Citroën C3 Aircross, also known in some foreign markets by the shortened name Citroën Aircross, is a comfort-oriented city SUV with a characteristic playful design and an emphasis on interior variability. Its direct challenger is the technically related Peugeot 2008, which is also sold under the designation Peugeot e-2008 for its fully electric variant, and conversely attracts drivers with a more aggressive sporty look and a premium-style interior. Let's take a detailed look at which of these attractive French crossovers will be the better choice for your daily journeys in the world of roughly four-year-old used cars.
When looking at the used car market for vehicles around four years old, we encounter a completely different approach to body proportions in these two French siblings. While the Citroën C3 Aircross (in its first generation) bets on a more playful and compact concept with an emphasis on height, the Peugeot 2008 (in its second generation) has taken the path of a more dynamic and mature look, which visually moves it almost a class higher. This difference in philosophy is fundamentally reflected in their exterior dimensions and determines how both cars are lived with in daily traffic.
The most striking difference is the overall length. The Peugeot 2008, with its 4 300 to 4 304 mm, is a significant 146 mm longer than the Citroën C3 Aircross, which measures a compact 4 154 mm in length. In practice, this means that the Citroën weaves through narrow city streets much more readily and is significantly easier to park in tight parallel spaces. Conversely, the Citroën C3 Aircross gains valuable points with its height of 1 597 mm (compared to 1 523–1 530 mm for the Peugeot). The nearly 7-centimeter taller build gives the Citroën a more classic boxy SUV shape, which provides the driver with a higher seating position and passengers with more generous headroom. The Peugeot, on the other hand, stays closer to the ground, giving it a sportier and more confident stance, which also helps reduce aerodynamic drag at highway speeds.
Interestingly, despite the significant difference in overall length, both models offer an almost identical wheelbase. With a value of 2 604 mm for the Citroën and 2 605 mm for the Peugeot, the distance between the wheels is practically identical. This implies that the longitudinal space for the crew in the cabin is very similar, and the Peugeot uses its length advantage primarily in the body overhangs for a slightly deeper luggage compartment and a more elongated hood. In terms of overall proportions, the choice will be clear: if you are looking for a maximally agile and airy car for the city center, the shorter and taller Citroën will be a significant advantage. However, if you prefer a more representative look, a greater sense of robustness, and a more aerodynamic profile for more frequent trips out of town, the longer and lower Peugeot is a bullseye.
| Parameter | Citroën C3 Aircross SUV | Peugeot 2008 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Width (mm) | 1756 | 1770 |
| Length (mm) | 4154 | 4300-4304 |
| Height (mm) | 1597 | 1523-1530 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2604 | 2605 |
When choosing a compact city SUV, trunk volume often plays a decisive role, especially if the car is to serve as a full-fledged family vehicle. Both French rivals approach interior spaciousness slightly differently, even though they target similar customers looking for a reliable companion on the market for approximately four-year-old used cars. Whether you plan on the daily school run or need a car that can handle a summer family trip to the sea, the size and variability of the trunk determine how comfortably you will live with the car. The mentioned differences in liters represent space for several extra suitcases in practice and will influence whether the car is sufficient for weekend shopping as well as a longer vacation.
In terms of pure numbers, the second-generation Peugeot 2008 (produced since 2019) offers a generous and well-accessible basic trunk volume of 434 liters. A significant advantage is that the fully electric Peugeot e-2008 variant suffered no loss in trunk capacity – thanks to the clever integration of batteries under the floor and seats, it offers an identical 434 liters as the version with an internal combustion engine. After fully folding the rear backrests, the space further increases to an impressive 1,467 liters, making this attractive crossover easily serve even when moving larger and awkwardly shaped items.
On the other hand, the first-generation Citroën C3 Aircross counters with a basic trunk volume of 410 liters. Although it is a bit less than the Peugeot, this model has one huge trump card hidden – a sliding rear bench. If you slide the rear seats fully forward, the basic trunk volume suddenly increases to an excellent 520 liters, thereby surpassing most of its direct competitors. After fully folding the seats, you get a maximum volume of 1,289 liters. The Citroën thus represents a great choice for drivers who need maximum flexibility, whether it's a one-time transport of a bulky stroller or packing gear for skiing.
| Parameter | Citroën C3 Aircross SUV | Peugeot 2008 SUV |
|---|---|---|
| Basic volume (liters) | 410 | 434 |
| Max. volume after folding seats (liters) | 1,289 | 1,467 |
These numbers clearly show that while the Peugeot 2008 scores in its total maximum space after folding the seats and pleases with the preservation of capacity even in the purely electric version, the Citroën C3 Aircross takes the lead in everyday variability. If you often transport long and awkwardly shaped items, you will appreciate the overall length of the Peugeot, but for maximum trunk expansion while needing to keep the rear seats (albeit with limited legroom), the sliding bench in the Citroën is an invaluable helper.
The Peugeot 2008 pleases with overall larger space after folding and identical volume in the electric version, while the Citroën C3 Aircross excels with its clever sliding bench.
Towing capacity represents one of the most significant differences between these two urban crossovers and can be a decisive factor for used car buyers looking for towing capability for their weekend activities. When comparing vehicles approximately four years old, the Peugeot 2008 (second generation) has a clear advantage in this regard. With most of its internal combustion engines, it can easily tow a braked trailer weighing up to 1,200 kg and an unbraked one up to 640 kg. In contrast, the Citroën C3 Aircross (first generation) offers significantly more modest limits – it standardly tows a braked trailer only up to 840 kg, with the absolute maximum being 870 kg for the more powerful diesel versions (BlueHDi 120). The weight of an unbraked trailer for the Citroën is strictly limited to 600 kg.
Interesting deviations from the standard can be found in the more eco-friendly powertrains. If you opt for the newer hybrid version of the Peugeot 2008, its towing capacity is slightly reduced to 1,100 kg, while the purely electric variants (Peugeot e-2008) are not homologated for towing a trailer at all. In practice, these technical differences mean that while the Citroën C3 Aircross offers space for just a few extra suitcases on a light trailer, the Peugeot 2008 can handle towing heavier loads or a smaller caravan. For drivers, the Peugeot 2008 is a much more versatile choice in terms of towing capabilities, being fully sufficient for both weekend shopping and longer holidays.
| Model and engine | Braked trailer (kg) | Unbraked trailer (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Citroën C3 Aircross 1.2 PureTech | 840 | 600 |
| Citroën C3 Aircross 1.5 BlueHDi | 840 - 870 | 600 |
| Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech | 1200 | 595 - 640 |
| Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi | 1200 | 595 - 640 |
| Peugeot 2008 1.2 Hybrid | 1100 | 630 |
| Peugeot e-2008 (electric vehicle) | 0 | 0 |
Although both cars come from the same PSA Group family (now Stellantis), the generational gap is fully evident in terms of the technology used and the range of powertrains, which is absolutely crucial for approximately four-year-old used cars. While the first-generation Citroën C3 Aircross relies on an older technical foundation, proven internal combustion engines, and traditional six-speed automatic transmissions (EAT6), the second-generation Peugeot 2008 benefits from the newer and more flexible CMP platform. This allows it to offer not only a more modern eight-speed automatic (EAT8) but, above all, a wider power range and a fully electric version. The common denominator for both cars is otherwise the turbocharged 1.2 PureTech three-cylinder petrol engines and the economical 1.5 BlueHDi four-cylinder diesel engines. However, Peugeot aims more for dynamics with its top versions, while Citroën focuses on comfort and simplicity for undemanding users.
Under the hood of the Citroën C3 Aircross from 2020–2023, you will find a sensibly assembled range that doesn't play for sporty performance but will please the wallet. The petrol base consists of a 1.2 PureTech three-cylinder tuned to 81 kW (110 hp), which is always paired with a six-speed manual. Those who require an automatic must go for the more powerful version with 96 kW (130 hp), which is exclusively paired with the comfortable EAT6 six-speed unit. For highway drivers with higher annual mileage, economical 1.5 BlueHDi diesels were available. The basic version with 81 kW (110 hp) relied on a manual, while the more powerful variant with 88 kW (120 hp) used an automatic. It should be noted that production of the popular more powerful 1.5 BlueHDi 120 diesel version was definitively ended in the autumn of 2022, but it still represents a desirable and exceptionally reliable catch on the nearly-new used car market.
| Engine type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 PureTech 110 | Petrol | 81 | 205 | 6MT |
| 1.2 PureTech 130 | Petrol | 96 | 230 | 6AT |
| 1.5 BlueHDi 110 | Diesel | 81 | 250 | 6MT |
| 1.5 BlueHDi 120 | Diesel | 88 | 300 | 6AT |
Thanks to its newer platform, the Peugeot 2008 offers a much more diverse selection satisfying a wider range of drivers. The petrol base starts with the 1.2 PureTech engine with a more modest output of 74 kW (100 hp), while the golden middle ground is represented by the version with 96 kW (130 hp), which is the only one that can be had with both a manual and the excellent EAT8 eight-speed automatic. For truly demanding drivers, a powerful 1.2 PureTech version with 114 kW (155 hp) was available until the summer of 2022, which is an attractive benefit of the used car market today. The diesel representation follows this trend – the basic 1.5 BlueHDi with 74 kW (100 hp) disappeared from price lists in mid-2022, while the more powerful variant with 96 kW (130 hp) and an eight-speed automatic lasted much longer. Peugeot's absolute trump card, especially for those who have a place to charge, is the fully electric Peugeot e-2008 model with an output of 100 kW (136 hp).
| Engine type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1.2 PureTech 100 | Petrol | 74 | 205 | 6MT |
| 1.2 PureTech 130 | Petrol | 96 | 230 | 6MT / 8AT |
| 1.2 PureTech 155 | Petrol | 114 | 240 | 8AT |
| 1.5 BlueHDi 100 | Diesel | 74 | 250 | 6MT |
| 1.5 BlueHDi 130 | Diesel | 96 | 300 | 8AT |
| e-2008 136 | Electric | 100 | 260 | 1AT |
While Citroën will please undemanding drivers with a clear range of comfortable engines, Peugeot wins with a significantly wider selection, including a top-tier electric car and a smoother eight-speed automatic transmission, thanks to its more modern platform.
Choosing the right engine is crucial for long-term satisfaction with the car, its reliability, and overall residual value. Although both models come from the same Stellantis group and share related powertrains, there is an interesting difference in terms of their technical foundation. In the market for four-year-old used cars (vehicles manufactured around 2022), you will encounter the first generation (after facelift) of the Citroën C3 Aircross, which still uses the older PF1 chassis platform. In contrast, the Peugeot 2008 relies on the more modern, larger, and overall more advanced CMP platform, which arrived with its second generation. These structural differences, different weights, and different overall tuning of the cars mean that a slightly different engine version suits each of them. The following recommendations are based on real-world fuel consumption, user satisfaction, and mechanical reliability.
This turbocharged three-cylinder petrol engine is the most widespread on the four-year-old used car market and represents an absolutely ideal choice for the character of the C3 Aircross. The Citroën is tuned primarily for soft comfort and a smooth, calm ride, for which it does not need peak performance.
Because the second-generation Peugeot 2008 is physically larger, slightly heavier, and its chassis has more dynamic, sportier ambitions than its French sibling, it pays to go for the more powerful variant here.
Official fuel consumption figures often promise miracles, but the reality on the road for small crossovers is usually somewhat more sober. Especially for nearly new and roughly four-year-old used cars, which typically include the 1st generation Citroën C3 Aircross and the 2nd generation Peugeot 2008, it is crucial to monitor actual data from daily operation. For an objective comparison of the real appetite of these models, we used long-term user statistics from the independent portal Spritmonitor.de. The data shows interesting differences in how effectively identical group engines from both brands can work with the increased height and air resistance.
| Model and engine | Average consumption (l/100 km) |
|---|---|
| Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 100 (74 kW) | 6.0 |
| Citroën C3 Aircross 1.2 PureTech 110 (81 kW) | 6.2 |
| Peugeot 2008 1.2 PureTech 130 (96 kW) | 6.5 |
| Citroën C3 Aircross 1.2 PureTech 130 (96 kW) | 6.6 |
| Citroën C3 Aircross 1.5 BlueHDi 110 (81 kW) | 4.9 |
| Peugeot 2008 1.5 BlueHDi 130 (96 kW) | 5.0 |
From the perspective of the identified trends, it is clear that the small-displacement turbocharged three-cylinder PureTech engines do not save as much fuel as one might expect from their low displacement. The weakest petrol Peugeot 2008 takes an average of exactly six liters; however, for the more popular and dynamic 130 hp versions, the consumption for both cars already crosses the six-and-a-half-liter mark. Here, the higher body typical of SUVs simply takes its toll, which is most noticeable during highway travel. In contrast, the BlueHDi diesel four-cylinders clearly dominate in efficiency and easily run around five liters per hundred kilometers. The slightly smoother aerodynamics of the Peugeot then help it achieve marginal savings of tenths compared to the equally powerful engines of the boxier Citroën.
For a typical buyer of these cars, this leads to a relatively easy decision. If you are choosing a car primarily for city driving, shopping, and shorter suburban routes, the petrol variants are the ideal choice despite slightly higher fuel consumption – they avoid problems associated with the complex warming up of a diesel engine in the city. If, however, you commute longer distances or spend more time traveling on highways, the economical BlueHDi diesel units will be significantly more considerate of your wallet and overall range.
In the end, however, consumption itself will probably not be the main reason to prefer one car over the other. Since they share identical group technology, the real differences in powertrain efficiency between them are completely negligible. A much more important role in the final selection will be played by the distinctive design, dashboard layout, or overall chassis tuning, which is very specific for both French representatives.
When looking at the used car market and focusing on popular models around four years old (i.e., 2021 to 2022 model years), we encounter quite significant differences. Although both cars share a lot of common group technology under the hood, their different market positioning and design philosophy are very clearly reflected in their residual value.
Citroën C3 Aircross (after the first generation facelift) is a very tempting and pragmatic choice on the used car market. From the start, the French automaker aimed for an excellent price-to-value ratio with this model, which is reflected in very favorable prices on the four-year-old used market. You will commonly come across decently equipped cars with a documented history and acceptable mileage for amounts well below the €12,300 mark. If a recent year of manufacture and a low price are your priorities, the C3 Aircross is an exceptionally strong player.
Peugeot 2008 (in its second generation), on the other hand, benefits from its more aggressive and overall more premium appearance. Its modern i-Cockpit interior and attractive SUV proportions mean that it holds its value much better among both Czech and European customers. For four-year-old used cars, you must be prepared for a significantly higher initial investment. Prices commonly start above the €13,600 mark and, for attractive trim levels with an automatic transmission, can easily climb to €18,500.
| Model | Base trim / High mileage | Mid-range trim / Average condition | Full trim / Low mileage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Citroën C3 Aircross | €10,300 | €12,300 | €14,400 |
| Peugeot 2008 | €13,600 | €15,600 | €18,500 |
Note: The amounts listed are average market prices, which may vary depending on the specific engine, history, and overall condition of the vehicle.
If your priority is the best possible price and family practicality, a used Citroën C3 Aircross will save your wallet thousands, while the Peugeot 2008 will appeal to those who are happy to pay extra for a more attractive design and more premium craftsmanship with better residual value.
Both models boast a maximum five-star rating from the independent Euro NCAP organization. However, it is crucial to put these results into the correct context. Testing methodology and protocols evolve and become stricter over the years, which is why percentage ratings from different years cannot be directly compared. Newer tests place much greater emphasis on active safety assistants, cyclist detection capabilities, and vehicle behavior in complex intersection situations, while older tests focused primarily on passive protection of occupants during the impact itself.
The Citroën C3 Aircross underwent crash tests in 2017, meaning its certification was conducted according to older and significantly less stringent standards. The car received very solid ratings for adult protection (85%) and child protection (82%), which confirms a reliable and solid body structure for a roughly four-year-old used car. However, significantly weaker results were shown in the category of protection for vulnerable road users (64%) and safety assist systems (60%). Given the year of testing, today's advanced active safety features were not required of the vehicle. Although the Citroën C3 Aircross is structurally safe, its five-star certification has expired by today's standards, and its technological equipment corresponds to older generations of vehicles.
The Peugeot 2008 underwent Euro NCAP testing two years later, in 2019. The five-star result was achieved by the model equipped with the optional Safety Pack, while the standard equipment earned four stars at the time. This model's results reflect a stricter methodology that included new frontal collision scenarios and a much more detailed evaluation of active systems. The car excels with a high level of protection for adult passengers (93%) and children (84%). It also performs much better in pedestrian and cyclist protection (73%) and in the safety assist category (73%), clearly demonstrating the presence of more modern sensors and a more reliable automatic emergency braking system with detection of vulnerable road users.
From the perspective of both active and passive safety, the Peugeot 2008 represents a more comprehensive and modern package. Its rating takes into account newer Euro NCAP protocols, which more strictly examine assistance systems and the car's ability to actually prevent collisions. The Citroën C3 Aircross offers robust passive protection; however, it lags noticeably in terms of technology and lacks the advanced assistance functions that are available in a much more sophisticated form in the newer Peugeot.
| Parameter | Citroën C3 Aircross | Peugeot 2008 |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | 2017 | 2019 |
| Adult occupant protection | 85 % | 93 % |
| Child occupant protection | 82 % | 84 % |
| Vulnerable road users protection | 64 % | 73 % |
| Safety assist systems | 60 % | 73 % |
Thanks to newer technologies and a stricter testing year, the Peugeot 2008 offers a significantly better level of active safety and assistance systems, making it a more secure choice for those interested in a used car.
In addition to standard equipment, each of the models offers several unique features that can be decisive for the customer during the final selection, with both French SUVs taking a completely different approach to added value.
Extreme emphasis on driving comfort thanks to Advanced Comfort seats and softer suspension
Highly practical and versatile interior including a sliding rear bench
Excellent visibility from the car supported by a higher and more upright driving position
More favorable average purchase price on the market for roughly four-year-old used cars
Distinctive design with wide options for exterior color personalization
More pronounced body roll during sharper cornering
More outdated and slower touchscreen infotainment system
Larger proportion of hard plastics in the interior giving a cheaper impression
Absolute lack of sporty character, which may not suit dynamic drivers
The Citroën C3 Aircross is an ideal choice for families and calmer drivers who prioritize maximum comfort and everyday utility over sporty performance. Thanks to its cleverly designed versatile interior with sliding seats, it offers an excellent ratio of interior space to exterior dimensions at a very attractive price.
Exceptionally attractive and aggressive exterior design with a characteristic light signature
High-quality interior with soft-touch materials approaching the premium segment
More confident and fun driving characteristics with more precise steering
Availability of a purely electric variant (e-2008) on the used car market
Advanced technologies including the innovative i-Cockpit solution with a 3D instrument cluster
The specific position behind the small steering wheel (i-Cockpit) can obscure the gauges for taller drivers
Higher average purchase price of used cars compared to the Citroën
Slightly less headroom in the rear seats due to the sloping roofline
Noticeably firmer chassis tuning, which filters out bumps less effectively on larger wheels
The Peugeot 2008 will appeal to more demanding buyers who expect a stylish look, modern technology, and a high-quality interior from a compact SUV. Its more dynamic driving characteristics make it a great car for those who enjoy driving and don't mind paying a bit extra for a more aggressive design and better materials.
Based on data from service bulletins, long-term user experiences, and statistics from comprehensive vehicle inspections, we have compiled an overview of the most common problems that buyers of approximately four-year-old used cars in this category should watch out for.
Citroën C3 Aircross is popular for its comfort and practicality, but for used models, special attention needs to be paid particularly to the condition of specific engines and onboard electronics.
It is crucial to check the honest service history and physical condition of the timing belt for the 1.2 PureTech engine. Otherwise, it is a relatively reliable family car, where only a glitching dashboard display occasionally causes trouble.
The second generation of the Peugeot 2008 uses the same chassis and engine platform as the C3 Aircross, so it shares many ailments, but adds specific problems associated with its more modern electronics.
For used units, the most important thing is to monitor the condition of the engines and test the correct functioning of the otherwise very impressive digital i-Cockpit. Careful selection of a verified car is a necessary foundation for this attractive crossover.
When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key. Here are some specific points to focus on for these two models. The reliability and actual condition of a car are always best revealed by a detailed used car inspection by an experienced mechanic.
Peugeot 2008 offers a basic luggage capacity of 434 liters, which is a very decent value for everyday needs. The Citroën has 410 liters as standard, but thanks to practical sliding rear seats, its capacity can be continuously increased up to 520 liters. For maximum family versatility, the Citroën C3 Aircross is a slightly smarter choice.
The Citroën C3 Aircross is renowned for its emphasis on a softer chassis and special seats with additional padding, providing exceptional ride comfort. In contrast, the Peugeot has a stiffer damper setup, which filters out sharp bumps less effectively but keeps the body more stable at higher speeds. For a relaxed and smooth ride on rougher roads, the Citroën is the clear winner.
The Peugeot 2008 uses the futuristic i-Cockpit concept with a very small steering wheel and raised digital instruments, which may not suit every body type. In contrast, the Citroën relies on a more classic dashboard layout and a more playful design with a greater emphasis on spaciousness and light in the cabin. If you prefer a traditional driving position and a more airy interior, you will feel better in the Citroën C3 Aircross.
The Peugeot 2008 is built on a more modern chassis platform, which ensures more agile behavior, more precise steering, and great confidence in corners. Due to its taller build and very comfortable tuning, the Citroën C3 Aircross leans more in corners and its steering lacks significant feedback. For a more dynamic and fun drive on country roads, the Peugeot is therefore better.
If you are looking for a roughly four-year-old used plug-in vehicle, the Peugeot 2008 is also available in a fully electric version, the Peugeot e-2008, with a real-world range of around 300 kilometers. The first-generation Citroën C3 Aircross, on the other hand, relies exclusively on classic petrol and diesel internal combustion engines. Those interested in pure electromobility and locally emission-free operation must automatically reach for the model with the lion emblem.
Choosing between these two French crossovers depends primarily on your daily needs and allocated budget. If you are looking for a more affordable, maximally comfortable, and highly versatile family car with a cleverly designed interior, the Citroën C3 Aircross will delight you with its sliding rear bench and smooth ride. Conversely, the Peugeot 2008 represents a more mature and representative choice for more demanding drivers, offering a more premium interior with the innovative i-Cockpit, a bolder design, and a more confident, sportier chassis, plus the option of a purely electric variant. While the Citroën will thus be an ideal and rational partner for quiet family trips with an emphasis on comfort, the Peugeot will appeal to used car buyers who are happy to pay extra for modern technology, refined style, and much better driving dynamics.
Sources: ADAC, novinky.cz, auto.cz, techfocus.cz, autoexpress.cz, youngtimer.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Nissan Juke vs Opel Mokka: A detailed comparison of design, ride, and features. Our verdict will help you choose the right compact crossover.
Apr 14, 2026

Detailed comparison of Škoda Kamiq vs Toyota Yaris Cross. Discover the differences in space, fuel consumption, and equipment. Our verdict will help you choose the right city SUV.
Apr 14, 2026

Detailed comparison of Kia Sportage vs. Škoda Karoq. Discover the differences in engines, equipment, and real-world fuel consumption. Our verdict will make it easier for you to choose the ideal used SUV.
Apr 18, 2026