
BMW M2 vs. BMW M4: Complete comparison 2026
Detailed comparison of BMW M2 vs BMW M4. Discover the differences in performance and reliability and read the final verdict for choosing your ideal used car.
Apr 27, 2026
Articles
Car battle
Audi RS 5 vs Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé comparison. We compared real-world performance, driving dynamics, and features. Find out which sports coupé is the right one for you!
May 8, 2026


The Audi RS 5, a masterpiece from Ingolstadt renowned for the unwavering confidence of its quattro all-wheel drive and its technologically advanced twin-turbocharged six-cylinder engine, represents the pinnacle of elegance combined with stunning speed and everyday usability. Facing off against it is the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé (often known in its more powerful variant as the C 63 S or under its former designation, the Mercedes-Benz C 63 AMG), an iconic rear-wheel-drive car from Affalterbach that captivates automotive enthusiasts with the unmistakable roar and brutal power of its full-blooded V8. Dive into our detailed comparison and find out whether, in the battle of these exceptionally attractive used cars, the cool traction precision of the four rings or the untamed emotions and burnt rubber of the three-pointed star on the hood will prevail.
When looking at the exterior dimensions of both iconic sports cars, we encounter some very interesting differences. Focusing on models available on the used car market around four years old (F5 generation for Audi and 205 for Mercedes), the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé gives a more robust overall impression. With a length of 4,751 mm, it is 28 mm longer than the Audi RS 5 Coupé and offers a massive 74 mm longer wheelbase (2,840 mm vs. 2,766 mm). Audi, on the other hand, counters with a lower body height – it is 29 mm lower, which gives it a more crouched, aggressive stance and helps slightly lower the center of gravity. This difference in proportions directly affects the character of both cars: the more compact and lower Audi will appeal to buyers who prefer the feeling of a tight, purely sporty connection with the road, while the longer wheelbase and overall build of the Mercedes will convince drivers looking for more stable behavior at high speeds and a visually more substantial silhouette.
An interesting comparison arises with the more practical five-door and four-door variants of both rivals. The Audi RS 5 Sportback (sloping rear with a liftgate) outgrows the rival Mercedes-AMG C 63 Sedan by 26 mm in length and is also noticeably wider (1,866 mm vs. 1,839 mm). However, Mercedes maintains a shared platform and a 2,840 mm wheelbase across models, which is still 14 mm longer than the Sportback version. These parameters play a crucial role for family-oriented buyers. Audi's wider and longer body brings better practicality thanks to the huge trunk opening, but the Mercedes Sedan benefits from a higher roof and longer wheelbase, which is a clear advantage if you require maximum headroom and legroom for adult passengers in the back.
A significant factor when choosing a used car approximately four years old is the variety of body styles available. A strong weapon for the Stuttgart-based carmaker in the 205 generation is the availability of a purely family-oriented estate version (T-Modell), which extends the body to 4,772 mm and increases the overall height to achieve maximum internal volume. At Audi, those interested in a classic family estate (Avant) with the RS 5 badge will have to wait for the entirely new B10 generation from 2026. Therefore, if the decisive factor when choosing a high-performance used car is the largest possible transport capacity combined with a traditional "boxy" trunk shape, the Mercedes in the estate version becomes an unrivaled choice, against which Audi in the compared generation can only offer a stylish compromise in the form of an elegant liftback.
| Parameter | Audi RS 5 Coupé | Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé | Audi RS 5 Sportback | Mercedes-AMG C 63 Sedan | Mercedes-AMG C 63 Estate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Length (mm) | 4,723 | 4,751 | 4,783 | 4,757 | 4,772 |
| Width (mm) | 1,866 | 1,877 | 1,866 | 1,839 | 1,839 |
| Height (mm) | 1,372 | 1,401 | 1,399 | 1,426 | 1,441 |
| Wheelbase (mm) | 2,766 | 2,840 | 2,826 | 2,840 | 2,840 |
Although customers buy high-performance cars like Audi RS 5 and Mercedes-AMG C 63 primarily for their top-tier driving dynamics, in the role of daily drivers, trunk capacity plays a key role. Whether it's everyday family usability, sufficient space for weekend shopping, or packing for a longer vacation, the practicality of the trunk can significantly influence overall satisfaction with the vehicle. Both automakers offer completely different approaches to interior space solutions in the market for approximately four-year-old used cars (we are focusing on reliably proven vehicles from the F5 generation for Audi and the 205 generation for Mercedes), which depend primarily on your chosen body style.
In the case of the Audi RS 5, buyers have a choice between the classic two-door Coupé and the much more practical five-door Sportback model (which falls into the hatchback/liftback category by standard definitions). While the Coupé from 2020–2023 offers a base trunk volume of 410 liters, a value perfectly sufficient for the standard luggage of two passengers, the Sportback version is the true all-rounder. It boasts not only a larger base volume of 465 liters but also offers unparalleled access to the trunk thanks to its massive liftgate. After folding down the rear seats, the space increases to an impressive 1,280 liters. Such a vast loading area easily swallows sports equipment and provides ample room for several extra suitcases.
The competing Mercedes-AMG C 63 of the 205 generation counters with a wider range of body styles, but its direct competitor, the two-door Coupé, is significantly more modest in terms of space – the trunk volume here is just 355 liters. If you require more space in the "C-Class," you need to go for the four-door Sedan version, which offers a more generous 480 liters, or choose a purely family-oriented path with the station wagon version labeled T-Modell (Estate). This features a base volume of 490 liters, and after folding the backrests, the space expands to a maximum of 1,510 liters, covering even the most demanding transport tasks. Just be careful if you are considering the newer generation of the vehicle (the C 63 S E PERFORMANCE version, designated 206, sold since 2023). In this plug-in hybrid variant, a large part of the trunk had to make way for the traction battery, which is why the trunk capacity has shrunk to just 280 liters for the sedan and 360 liters for the estate.
| Parameter | Audi RS 5 Coupé | Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé | Audi RS 5 Sportback (Hatchback) | Mercedes-AMG C 63 Sedan | Mercedes-AMG C 63 T-Modell (Estate) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Base volume (liters) | 410 | 355 | 465 | 480 | 490 |
| Maximum volume after folding (liters) | - | - | 1280 | - | 1510 |
While the Mercedes-AMG C 63 limits you with less space in the coupé and forces you to reach for the spacious estate version (T-Modell) for maximum transport capacity, the Audi RS 5 Sportback offers a brilliant compromise. With it, you get an attractive sporty look that, thanks to excellent trunk access and large volume, easily serves as a full-fledged car for everyday family life.
If practicality and towing capacity are key for you when choosing a high-performance car, the battle between the Audi RS 5 and Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé models has very specific rules. For typical representatives on the used car market around four years old – namely the F5 (Audi) and 205 (Mercedes) generations – do not expect any miracles in this regard. The official standard and maximum trailer weight for both of these pure-bred sports coupes is exactly 0 kg. Due to the large rear diffusers, sports exhaust systems, and ultimate focus on driving dynamics, models from this era have no factory homologation for the installation of a tow bar.
However, the situation changes radically if we look at different and newer versions. The upcoming generations of both cars bring an unexpected shift. While older models with large-displacement engines do not allow towing, the modern plug-in hybrid version Mercedes-AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE (generation 206) offers a respectable standard and maximum braked trailer weight of 1800 kg. It is ably seconded by the brand-new generation Audi RS 5 (B10), where the maximum and standard value has climbed to 1900 kg.
In practice, these generational differences represent a huge step forward in everyday usability. While with four-year-old used cars you must rely exclusively on the internal trunk capacity, connecting a trailer to more modern hybrid and newer models brings flexible space for several extra suitcases, representing a transport capacity more than sufficient for weekend shopping or a longer holiday with the whole family.
In conclusion, trailer weight will not make your decision between typical four-year-old used cars of both models any easier, as neither of them allows towing and tabular data for these versions does not exist. However, if towing is an absolute necessity, it makes clear sense to consider moving to newer (often plug-in hybrid) generations, which can handle this requirement surprisingly well.
| Model and motorization | Braked weight of trailer (kg) | Unbraked weight of trailer (kg) |
|---|---|---|
| Audi RS 5 (B10, 375 kW) | 1900 | 750 |
| Mercedes-AMG C 63 S E PERFORMANCE (206, 350 kW) | 1800 | 750 |
When choosing a high-performance coupe on the used car market (roughly four-year-old vehicles), the Audi RS 5 and Mercedes-AMG C 63 represent completely different engineering approaches, which has a fundamental impact on daily usability, efficiency, and emotions behind the wheel. While Audi bets on certainty and technological precision thanks to its twin-turbocharged 2.9 TFSI V6 paired with advanced all-wheel drive, Mercedes remains faithful to the traditional muscular concept with a hand-assembled twin-turbocharged 4.0 V8 BiTurbo, which sends its power exclusively to the rear wheels. For used car buyers, this means deciding between versatility and uncompromising character: the Audi powertrain brings excellent traction in any weather and slightly better fuel economy with higher reliability for regular commuting. Conversely, the AMG V8 stands out with brutal power, massive torque, and an unmistakable sound, making it a car sought after by demanding purists. Both manufacturers use lightning-fast multi-speed automatic transmissions that ensure flawless straight-line dynamics.
The Audi RS 5 (in the relevant F5 generation after the 2021–2023 facelift) does not offer different performance levels but relies on a single, perfectly tuned powertrain. Under the hood is a 2.9 TFSI V6 petrol engine with two turbochargers nestled between the cylinder banks, producing 331 kW and a massive 600 Nm of torque. Power is always and without exception distributed to all four wheels via the renowned quattro permanent all-wheel-drive system and a smooth-shifting eight-speed Tiptronic automatic transmission. The strength of this setup is rocket-like acceleration regardless of current grip and extraordinary driver-friendliness for year-round daily use. Customers focused on operating costs within this segment will also appreciate the more reasonable fuel requirements compared to larger-displacement competitors. The weakness for some may be a slightly more sterile character that cannot provide the same spectacle and acoustic drama as a bubbling V8.
| Engine Type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.9 TFSI V6 | Petrol | 331 | 600 | 8AT |
The engine lineup for the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé (generation C205, cars from roughly 2020–2023) fulfills the dreams of traditional high-performance engine lovers. The main asset is the charismatic 4.0 V8 BiTurbo petrol engine. Unlike Audi, those interested in a late-model used car could choose from two performance specifications – the standard C 63 has 350 kW and 650 Nm, while the more powerful top-tier C 63 S AMG version jumped to a final 375 kW and a monstrous 700 Nm. All models use the nine-speed AMG SPEEDSHIFT MCT 9G dual-clutch transmission and are purely rear-wheel drive. The "S" version additionally delights sportier drivers with an electronically controlled limited-slip differential and active engine mounts. As model year data shows, the newer generation of this model (from 2024, designated as S E PERFORMANCE) has irrevocably replaced this legendary V8 with a heavy and complex four-cylinder plug-in hybrid. Since the classic pure petrol V8 engine is no longer and will not be available, C205 models with the V8 are becoming highly valued and sought-after collector's items. The weakness of this raw power is the literally murderous rate of rear tire wear and significantly higher demands for regular maintenance.
| Engine Type | Fuel | Power (kW) | Torque (Nm) | Transmission |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 V8 BiTurbo (C 63) | Petrol | 350 | 650 | 9AT |
| 4.0 V8 BiTurbo (C 63 S) | Petrol | 375 | 700 | 9AT |
For drivers looking for a high-performance yet absolutely safe GT for year-round commuting regardless of weather and road conditions, the V6 Audi RS 5 with its legendary all-wheel drive is the clear choice. In contrast, passionate purists, enthusiasts of playful handling, and drivers looking for the unfiltered character of a traditional engine should reach for the Mercedes-AMG C 63 S Coupé without hesitation. Due to the end of pure petrol V8s in this class, the Mercedes represents not only an incredible tool for fun but also a huge perspective for value retention in the future used car market.
While the Audi RS 5 scores with perfect traction and versatile daily usability, the outgoing V8 Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé remains a valuable masterpiece for lovers of scorching power, rear-wheel drive, and unforgettable sound.
Choosing the right engine and drivetrain is absolutely crucial for long-term satisfaction with high-performance sports cars. In this specific league, you are not just looking for performance on paper, but the best compromise between brutal power, everyday usability, mechanical reliability, and real-world running costs. The following recommendations for roughly four-year-old used cars are based on real-world service experience, long-term owner feedback, and technical specifications. An interesting aspect of this comparison is the different approach of the manufacturers – while Audi refined its twin-turbocharged six-cylinder to absolute efficiency, Mercedes-AMG in its previous generation relied on a characterful V8, which from today's perspective represents an exceptionally prized rarity.
The core and de facto only, yet absolutely brilliant heart of the RS 5 Coupé and Sportback models (in the F5 generation, whose production for these versions ended between 2023 and 2024) is the twin-turbocharged 2.9 TFSI V6 developed in close cooperation with Porsche. This unit represents the absolute pinnacle in the ratio of everyday usability to extreme dynamics.
For the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé generation 205 (on sale until roughly spring 2023), it is an absolute must to look for the V8 engine with the code designation M177, ideally in the more powerful "S" variant. As available data shows, the new generation (206) has already switched exclusively to a four-cylinder plug-in hybrid under the name C 63 S E PERFORMANCE. This makes the older V8 generation W205/C205 an extremely sought-after and collectable "last of its kind" with immense charisma on the four-year-old used car market.
For sports cars with power reaching the 500 hp mark, the difference between official manufacturer data and the harsh reality on the road is often vast. Especially with roughly four-year-old used cars, whose official consumption figures were created under outdated laboratory conditions, real-world driving usually brings surprises, and paper values simply cannot be taken at face value.
To get an accurate picture of how much these powerful cars actually consume, we rely on long-term real-world data from drivers themselves, specifically from the German community portal Spritmonitor.de. We included engine versions from generations that currently make the most sense on the four-year-old used car market – namely the Audi RS 5 F5 generation (model years 2021–2023) and the Mercedes-AMG C 63 205 generation (model years 2020–2023).
Data source: Spritmonitor.de /
| Model and engine | Average consumption (l/100 km) |
|---|---|
| Audi RS 5 2.9 TFSI V6 331 kW | 10.8 |
| Mercedes-AMG C 63 4.0 V8 Bi-Turbo 350 kW | 11.6 |
| Mercedes-AMG C 63 S 4.0 V8 Bi-Turbo 375 kW | 12.2 |
When interpreting real-world trends, a rather surprising finding emerges. Although Audi opted for popular downsizing with the F5 generation, replacing the previous naturally aspirated V8 with a smaller 2.9-liter twin-turbo V6, no revolutionary savings occur in practice. The difference compared to the massive four-liter V8 from AMG is actually only about one liter of fuel per hundred kilometers. This is a typical drawback of smaller turbo engines – as soon as you start using even a bit of their dynamic potential, the turbochargers must compensate for the missing displacement with a richer fuel mixture, and consumption begins to rise sharply. Naturally, we won't find any diesel engines in this league, so long "diesel-like" ranges without frequent refueling are out of the question for either rival.
For the average user, this means that if they use the car primarily for smooth highway cruising or relaxed commuting, the smaller engine in the Audi will be slightly kinder to the wallet and maintain a more reasonable appetite. However, as soon as you move into heavy city traffic with frequent starts or head out to winding backroads, both cars will cross the 15 l/100 km mark without blinking. Furthermore, in the city, the Mercedes pays the price for its huge displacement, and the bubbling V8 takes its toll for its iconic sound in the form of the fastest-disappearing tank.
In conclusion, it can be said with certainty that fuel consumption should not play any major role when deciding between these two cars. Anyone buying or financing a premium four-year-old coupe with similar performance must automatically expect high operating costs. The financial difference, which amounts to about a liter and a half of fuel, is completely negligible compared to the astronomical prices of large brake discs, wide sports tires, and comprehensive insurance. You should therefore choose the winner based on your preferred character – whether it's the surgically precise all-wheel drive from Audi or the unruly rear-wheel drive from the AMG workshops.
Looking at the used car market for vehicles approximately four years old (2021–2023 models), a very different value trend emerges for both German rivals. We are comparing the Audi RS 5 B9 generation (facelift) and the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé C205 generation (also facelifted). While the Audi follows a classic depreciation curve, the Mercedes benefits from strong collector potential due to the discontinuation of V8 engines.
Prices for used Audi RS 5 models with the 2.9 TFSI V6 biturbo engine are falling at a predictable rate typical of premium sports models. This makes it a very rational and more financially accessible choice as a used car.
The situation for the "C-Class" AMG is diametrically different. The C205 generation is the last to house the legendary 4.0 V8 biturbo engine under the hood. This fact has caused the car to hold its value almost phenomenally.
| Model and Engine | Approx. Price From | Approx. Price To | Depreciation Characteristics |
|---|---|---|---|
| Audi RS 5 (2.9 V6) | €66,000 | €91,000 | Natural decline, good second-hand buy |
| Mercedes-AMG C 63 (4.0 V8) | €62,000 | €70,000 | Very stable prices |
| Mercedes-AMG C 63 S (4.0 V8) | €74,000 | €95,000 | Negligible decline, future collector potential |
Note: The amounts above are indicative and depend on the specific service history, mileage, and overall technical condition of the vehicle.
While you can get an Audi RS 5 as a fantastic and daily-usable sports car with natural depreciation, the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé is more expensive on the used market, but thanks to its irreplaceable V8 engine, it offers minimal value loss and serves almost as an investment.
When evaluating the safety of used premium cars, such as four-year-old Audi RS 5 and Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé models, it is essential to rely on independent tests by the Euro NCAP organization. Both mentioned models achieved the maximum five-star rating in their testing cycles. However, it is crucial to view these results in the context of the time they were tested. Euro NCAP protocols and methodologies are constantly evolving and becoming stricter over the years, meaning that percentage scores from different years cannot be directly compared with the results of the latest vehicles on the market. Modern tests take much more account of advanced assistance systems, such as complex emergency scenarios at intersections or improved cyclist detection.
The Audi RS 5 B9 generation (which includes popular four-year-old used cars) structurally benefits from the A4/A5 family platform, whose crash tests took place in 2015. At the time, the car excelled with an extraordinary level of passive safety and occupant protection. The rival Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé, sharing its architecture with the then C-Class (C205 generation), underwent crash tests a year earlier, in 2014. It also outclassed most competitors at the time with its exceptionally robust bodywork, although the evaluation of its assistance systems logically reflects the older methodology from the beginning of the last decade.
| Parameter | Audi RS 5 | Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé |
|---|---|---|
| Year of testing | 2015 | 2014 |
| Adult occupant protection | 89 % | 92 % |
| Child occupant protection | 87 % | 84 % |
| Vulnerable road user protection | 75 % | 77 % |
| Safety assist systems | 75 % | 70 % |
From the perspective of today's used car market, this means that both cars offer top-tier mechanical and structural safety supported by rigid construction, sophisticated crumple zones, and a comprehensive network of airbags. However, in terms of validity under current and stricter Euro NCAP rules, their original five-star certification has already formally expired due to obsolescence. In a direct comparison of percentage results, the Audi emerged from the tests with slightly more advanced safety assistants and better protection for child passengers. The Mercedes, on the other hand, recorded slightly better results in adult occupant protection and collisions with vulnerable road users.
Ultimately, those interested in these high-performance cars need not worry at all – both provide exceptionally reliable protection in the event of an accident. However, potential buyers must take into account that the cars do not possess the absolute most advanced active systems offered by today's brand-new generations. Overall, the Audi offers a slightly more balanced and marginally more modern foundation of safety technologies, although in real-world traffic, the safety difference between the two cars is minimal.
Both cars provide excellent passive occupant protection supported by five-star Euro NCAP ratings from 2014 and 2015, although in terms of modern assistance systems, they no longer represent the current absolute peak due to their age.
In addition to standard equipment, each of the models offers several unique features and technological innovations that go beyond basic functionality and provide specific added value for the customer in both daily and sporty use.
Great traction and confidence in all weather conditions thanks to standard quattro all-wheel drive
Top-notch interior with the highly intuitive Audi Virtual Cockpit digital instrument cluster
Excellent compromise between sporty dynamics and everyday touring comfort (works as an outstanding gran turismo)
Powerful and flexible 2.9 TFSI V6 biturbo engine with strong pull from low revs
More subtle and elegant appearance that doesn't attract unwanted attention unnecessarily
The V6 sound is less emotive and lacks drama compared to V8 competitors
Extremely safe but less playful handling with a slight tendency toward understeer at the limit
Overall more sterile driving experience that doesn't involve you as much in the action
Audi RS 5 is the perfect choice for those looking for a lightning-fast and elegant coupe for everyday use regardless of the season or weather. Thanks to quattro drive and overall soundproofing, it offers immense confidence behind the wheel, which will be especially appreciated by drivers who prefer unwavering precision over tail-happy playfulness.
Charismatic 4.0 V8 biturbo engine with a brutal sound that is already disappearing from this class
Fun and very playful handling thanks to pure rear-wheel drive and a smart electronic differential
More aggressive and muscular exterior design with flared fenders that commands immediate respect
High-quality materials in the cabin with an excellent sporty driving position
Great steering feedback that rewards more experienced drivers
Exclusive rear-wheel drive combined with massive torque can be treacherous in the wet or snow
Noticeably stiffer and more uncompromising suspension tuning means less comfort on broken roads
Higher fuel consumption and faster wear of the rear tires
Older generation infotainment that lags slightly behind Audi's digital environment in terms of graphics and speed
The Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé is a genuine muscle car designed for true automotive enthusiasts who love the dramatic sound of a V8 and driving sideways. It is a much more emotive and demanding car to drive, generously rewarding sports driving enthusiasts, but in return, it requires compromises in daily comfort and winter usability.
Based on our own CarAudit inspections, long-term owner feedback, reliability statistics, and service reports, we have compiled an overview of the most common issues that used car buyers should watch out for. Given the complexity and performance of these sports models, a comprehensive vehicle inspection is always advisable before purchase to help detect costly hidden defects in time.
The Audi RS 5 B9 generation (with the 2.9 TFSI V6 engine) is an overall reliable and precisely engineered machine, yet it can experience specific faults associated with high performance and sophisticated technology.
The Audi RS 5 benefits from a reliable V6 and a robust transmission, but the main focus when buying a used one should be a thorough inspection of the brakes and a leak check of the complex DRC suspension system.
The Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé (C205 generation) with its iconic 4.0 V8 BiTurbo engine is considered a mechanically robust car, but its crushing performance takes an inevitable toll on consumables and stressed components.
Mechanically, it is an exceptionally strong car with a gem under the hood, but one must expect extreme rear tire consumption and occasional software or mechanical quirks from the sports transmission.
When buying a used car, a thorough inspection is key. Especially with premium sports models with exceptionally high performance, even minor maintenance neglect can mean huge future expenses. A thorough physical car inspection is an absolute necessity in this category. Here are some specific points to focus on for these two models.
The Audi RS 5 is equipped with quattro all-wheel drive as standard, giving it excellent stability and confidence in the wet or snow. The Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé relies on rear-wheel drive, which offers more playful handling but requires a much more experienced driver on slippery surfaces.
With its iconic twin-turbocharged eight-cylinder (V8) engine, the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé provides a much deeper, more aggressive, and more characterful sound. The Audi RS 5 uses a six-cylinder (V6) that sounds sporty and technically precise, but it doesn't reach the uncompromising brutality of the AMG engine.
Thanks to its perfectly tuned adaptive suspension and excellent sound insulation, the Audi RS 5 is generally a more comfortable and refined choice for daily commuting. The suspension in the AMG C 63 Coupé is designed to be much stiffer, which improves the car on the track but can be uncomfortable for the occupants on city potholes.
The Audi RS 5 Coupé has a 410-litre boot, comfortably beating the 355 litres of the Mercedes. Furthermore, the Audi has a more regular load area shape and better overall access, making it significantly more usable when loading larger luggage.
Both high-performance cars require an above-standard budget for regular maintenance, tyres, and high-performance brakes. However, the 2.9 V6 Biturbo engine in the Audi is generally considered slightly less demanding to service, while the prices for specific spare parts for the large V8 in the AMG are usually higher.
The final showdown between these two German icons from the four-year-old used car market has no absolute winner, as each car targets a completely different type of driver. If you are looking for an unwaveringly stable, year-round usable, and subtly fast gran turismo for daily travel, the Audi RS 5, with its precise six-cylinder engine and quattro drive, represents the perfect rational choice. Conversely, the Mercedes-AMG C 63 Coupé with its disappearing V8 engine is an uncompromising tool for automotive purists who don't mind higher running costs but demand unbridled emotions, rear-wheel drive, and an unmatched sound. While the Audi thus embodies surgical precision and technological certainty in all weather conditions, its Stuttgart rival remains a charismatic beast that, thanks to its irreplaceable character, also possesses huge collector potential.
Sources: ADAC, mdcr.cz, auto.cz, autorevue.cz, chytreauto.cz, nabijecka.cz
This article was prepared using artificial intelligence tools. The section guarantor is Petr Dušek.

Detailed comparison of BMW M2 vs BMW M4. Discover the differences in performance and reliability and read the final verdict for choosing your ideal used car.
Apr 27, 2026

Comparison of used Jaguar F-Type and Toyota GR Supra. A detailed look at performance, reliability, and real-world driving characteristics. Read our verdict!
Apr 28, 2026

Volkswagen Golf vs. Ford Focus: a detailed comparison of the engine, equipment, and reliability. Find out which of these hatchbacks is the best choice for you.
Apr 13, 2026